Suppr超能文献

六周极化强度与中等强度分布:一项试点干预研究。

Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study.

作者信息

Röhrken Golo, Held Steffen, Donath Lars

机构信息

Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2020 Nov 12;11:534688. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.534688. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence as to which program is more beneficial during triathlete training. This pilot study examined 6 weeks of training-macrocycle using polarized intensity distribution compared to moderate TID and it's effects on sub-maximal and maximal performance indices during running and cycling.

METHODS

Fifteen moderately trained triathletes were either assigned to an intervention group (INT, = 7, 2 females/5 males, Age: 29.1 ± 7.6) or a control group (CON, = 8, 2 females/6 males, Age: 30.3 ± 6.1). We used the minimization method (Strata: gender, age competition times, training volumes) to allocate the groups. The participants underwent incremental cycling and running testings before and after the intervention period to assess performance indices until objective exhaustion. CON employed a moderate TID with either medium-intensity (MIT) or low-intensity training (LIT). INT used polarized training intensity distribution (TID), with either LIT or high-intensity training (HIT). Average training hours and anthropometric data did not indicate any differences between CON and INT during the study period. We applied the polarization index of >2 in INT (2.1 ± 0.4) and <1 in CON (0.9 ± 0.3).

RESULTS

Both groups notably improved their lactate threshold 2 (+2.8 ± 5.1 %, = 0.026) and peak (+5.4 ± 6.2 %, = 0.002) running performance. We did not observe statistically significant time × group interaction effects in any of the performance outcomes between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Polarized TID in moderately trained triathletes did not prove to be superior compared to a more moderate TID. However, more studies in larger and more highly trained subjects are needed.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,极化训练强度分布(TID)计划可以提高耐力表现。然而,短距离铁人三项运动员的大部分特定比赛训练是围绕中等强度间歇进行的。关于哪种训练计划在铁人三项运动员训练中更有益,目前仍缺乏证据。这项初步研究比较了使用极化强度分布与中等TID进行6周训练大周期的情况,以及其对跑步和骑行过程中次最大和最大表现指标的影响。

方法

15名训练水平中等的铁人三项运动员被分配到干预组(INT,n = 7,2名女性/5名男性,年龄:29.1 ± 7.6)或对照组(CON,n = 8,2名女性/6名男性,年龄:30.3 ± 6.1)。我们使用最小化方法(分层:性别、年龄、比赛时间、训练量)来分配组别。参与者在干预期前后进行递增式骑行和跑步测试,以评估表现指标直至客观疲劳。CON采用中等TID,包括中等强度训练(MIT)或低强度训练(LIT)。INT使用极化训练强度分布(TID),包括LIT或高强度训练(HIT)。在研究期间,平均训练时长和人体测量数据表明CON和INT之间没有差异。我们在INT组应用了大于2的极化指数(2.1 ± 0.4),在CON组应用了小于1的极化指数(0.9 ± 0.3)。

结果

两组的乳酸阈值2(+2.8 ± 5.1%,p = 0.026)和峰值(+5.4 ± 6.2%,p = 0.002)跑步表现均显著提高。在两组之间的任何表现结果中,我们均未观察到具有统计学意义的时间×组交互效应。

结论

对于训练水平中等的铁人三项运动员,极化TID并未被证明比更中等的TID更优越。然而,需要对更多、训练水平更高的受试者进行更多研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c9/7689383/22cca32e00fb/fphys-11-534688-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验