Suppr超能文献

两极化和金字塔式训练强度分布:与半程铁三比赛的关系。

Polarized and Pyramidal Training Intensity Distribution: Relationship with a Half-Ironman Distance Triathlon Competition.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, Spain.

Public Health Research Group, University of Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Nov 19;18(4):708-715. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to relate the training intensity distribution with performance in a Half-Ironman distance triathlon competition. A total of 18 recreational-level triathletes were divided into two training groups according to their training intensity distribution: Polarized (POL) and Pyramidal (PYR). Prior to the specific training period of the study, subjects performed a ramp-protocol test, running and cycling to determine ventilatory thresholds (VT) through gas-exchange analysis. For swimming, subjects performed an 800-metre test to establish their training zones. Training was quantified based on the cumulative time spent in 3 intensity zones: zone 1 (low intensity, <VT1), zone 2 (moderate intensity, VT1-VT2) and zone 3 (high intensity >VT2). POL competed 84.5%/4.2%/11.3% and PYR 77.9%/18.8%/3.3% of total training time for zones 1,2 and 3 respectively. The goal of the training period was a half Ironman distance triathlon. Training time in zone 2 inversely correlated with swimming and cycling race time in POL and with running and total race time in PYR. Power at VT2 on bike and speed at VT2 as well as maximum aerobic power and speed in the physiological post test inversely correlated with bike and run segment respectively and with total race time. These results suggest that training time in zone 2 was related with better performance on a Half-Ironman race in amateur triathletes. Future experimental research is needed to clarify the importance of training intensity distribution regarding performance.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨半程铁人三项比赛中训练强度分布与表现的关系。共有 18 名业余水平的铁人三项运动员根据其训练强度分布分为两组:极化组(POL)和金字塔组(PYR)。在研究的特定训练期之前,受试者进行了斜坡方案测试,跑步和骑自行车通过气体交换分析来确定通气阈值(VT)。对于游泳,受试者进行了 800 米测试以确定他们的训练区。根据在 3 个强度区累计花费的时间来量化训练:区 1(低强度,<VT1)、区 2(中强度,VT1-VT2)和区 3(高强度>VT2)。POL 分别花费了总训练时间的 84.5%/4.2%/11.3%用于区 1、2 和 3,PYR 则分别花费了 77.9%/18.8%/3.3%。训练期的目标是半程铁人三项。POL 组中,区 2 的训练时间与游泳和自行车比赛时间呈负相关,而 PYR 组中,区 2 的训练时间与跑步和总比赛时间呈负相关。自行车上的 VT2 功率和 VT2 速度以及生理后测的最大有氧功率和速度分别与自行车和跑步段以及总比赛时间呈负相关。这些结果表明,在业余铁人三项运动员中,区 2 的训练时间与半程铁人三项比赛的表现有关。需要进一步的实验研究来阐明训练强度分布对表现的重要性。

相似文献

3
Applied physiology of triathlon.铁人三项运动的应用生理学
Sports Med. 1995 Apr;19(4):251-67. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519040-00003.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Athletes: Fit but Unhealthy?运动员:健康却不健康?
Sports Med Open. 2015;2:24. doi: 10.1186/s40798-016-0048-x. Epub 2016 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验