Liu Na, Miao Song, Qin Likang
Key laboratory of Plant Resource Conservation and Germplasm Innovation in Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education) Collaborative Innovation Center for Mountain Ecology & Agro-Bioengineering (CICMEAB) College of Life Sciences/Institute of Agrobioengineering, Guizhou University Guiyang China.
Teagasc Food Research Centre Cork Ireland.
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Sep 24;8(11):6095-6111. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1900. eCollection 2020 Nov.
In the study, H4-11, D1-1, H1-8, H2-12, and L1-1 were screened from traditional fermented rice acid based on several indicators: L-lactic acid production capacity (13.46 ~ 19.69 g/kg), antioxidant capacity (DPPH clearance ability of 35.36 ~ 56.89%), and savory flavor indicators. Glutinous rice, quinoa, barley rice, and brown rice were selected to carry out rice acid fermentation. Different viable lactic acid bacteria and yeasts were screened, respectively, in the saccharification, acidification, alcoholization, and late acidification stages. Rice acid fermented with H4-11 and L1-1 in glutinous rice showed the high L-lactic acid content (23.09 g/kg). The DPPH free radical scavenging ability in rice acid fermented with D1-1 and H4-11, respectively, reached 34.27% and 33.05% in 96 hr. Although quinoa rice acid had the highest L-lactic acid content (33.74 g/kg) and the DPPH free radical scavenging ability (60.10%), it had the poor taste due to the high astringency intensity and bitter intensity. Rice acid fermented with both H4-11 and L1-1 in glutinous rice showed the highest savory flavor and had the lowest astringency and bitter. H4-11 and L1-1 were the potential strains for the fermentation of rice acid. These results promote the industrial development of Chinese rice acid.
Rice acid as a functional nondairy fermented product is widely accepted by Chinese consumers. However, rice acid fermentation is still a traditional spontaneous process, which causes instability in its flavor and quality. H4-11 and L1-1 screened in this study contributed to the improvements in the flavor and antioxidant capacity of rice acid. In addition, glutinous rice was confirmed as the suitable fermentation material of rice acid in the study.
在该研究中,基于以下几个指标从传统发酵米酸中筛选出了H4-11、D1-1、H1-8、H2-12和L1-1:L-乳酸产生能力(13.4619.69克/千克)、抗氧化能力(DPPH清除能力为35.3656.89%)以及风味指标。选用糯米、藜麦、大麦米和糙米进行米酸发酵。在糖化、酸化、醇化和后期酸化阶段分别筛选出了不同的活性乳酸菌和酵母菌。用H4-11和L1-1在糯米中发酵的米酸显示出较高的L-乳酸含量(23.09克/千克)。分别用D1-1和H4-11发酵的米酸在96小时内DPPH自由基清除能力分别达到34.27%和33.05%。尽管藜麦米酸具有最高的L-乳酸含量(33.74克/千克)和DPPH自由基清除能力(60.10%),但由于涩味强度和苦味强度较高,其口感较差。用H4-11和L1-1在糯米中共同发酵的米酸具有最高的风味,且涩味和苦味最低。H4-11和L1-1是米酸发酵的潜在菌株。这些结果促进了中国米酸的工业化发展。
米酸作为一种功能性非乳制品发酵产品被中国消费者广泛接受。然而,米酸发酵仍然是一个传统的自发过程,这导致其风味和品质不稳定。本研究中筛选出的H4-11和L1-1有助于改善米酸的风味和抗氧化能力。此外,本研究证实糯米是米酸合适的发酵原料。