Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1033-1048. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13578.
Examine care integration-efforts to unify disparate parts of health care organizations to generate synergy across activities occurring within and between them-to understand whether and at which organizational level health systems impact care quality and staff experience.
Surveys administered to one practice manager (56/59) and up to 26 staff (828/1360) in 59 practice sites within 24 physician organizations within 17 health systems in four states (2017-2019).
We developed manager and staff surveys to collect data on organizational, social, and clinical process integration, at four organizational levels: practice site, physician organization, health system, and outside health systems. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and regression.
Managers and staff perceived opportunity for improvement across most types of care integration and organizational levels. Managers/staff perceived little variation in care integration across health systems. They perceived better care integration within practice sites than within physician organizations, health systems, and outside health systems-up to 38 percentage points (pp) lower (P < .001) outside health systems compared to within practice sites. Of nine clinical process integration measures, one standard deviation (SD) (7.2-pp) increase in use of evidence-based care related to 6.4-pp and 8.9-pp increases in perceived quality of care by practice sites and health systems, respectively, and a 4.5-pp increase in staff job satisfaction; one SD (9.7-pp) increase in integration of social services and community resources related to a 7.0-pp increase in perceived quality of care by health systems; one SD (6.9-pp) increase in patient engagement related to a 6.4-pp increase in job satisfaction and a 4.6-pp decrease in burnout; and one SD (10.6-pp) increase in integration of diabetic eye examinations related to a 5.5-pp increase in job satisfaction (all P < .05).
Measures of clinical process integration related to higher staff ratings of quality and experience. Action is needed to improve care integration within and outside health systems.
考察医疗保健组织为实现协同效应而进行的整合努力,即将不同部分统一起来,以理解医疗系统是否以及在何种组织层面上影响护理质量和员工体验。
2017 年至 2019 年期间,在四个州的 17 个卫生系统内的 24 个医生组织内的 59 个实践站点中,对一名实践经理(56/59)和最多 26 名员工(828/1360)进行了调查。
我们开发了经理和员工调查,以收集有关组织、社会和临床流程整合的数据,共涉及四个组织层面:实践站点、医生组织、医疗系统和外部医疗系统。我们使用描述性统计和回归分析对数据进行了分析。
经理和员工认为在大多数类型的医疗保健整合和组织层面上都有改进的机会。经理/员工认为医疗系统之间的医疗保健整合差异不大。他们认为在实践站点内的医疗保健整合比在医生组织、医疗系统和外部医疗系统内更好,与实践站点相比,外部医疗系统的整合度低了 38 个百分点(P<.001)。在九个临床流程整合措施中,使用基于证据的护理措施每增加一个标准差(7.2-pp),实践站点和医疗系统的护理质量感知分别增加 6.4-pp 和 8.9-pp,员工工作满意度增加 4.5-pp;社会服务和社区资源整合每增加一个标准差(9.7-pp),医疗系统的护理质量感知增加 7.0-pp;患者参与度每增加一个标准差(6.9-pp),员工工作满意度增加 6.4-pp,倦怠减少 4.6-pp;糖尿病眼部检查整合每增加一个标准差(10.6-pp),工作满意度增加 5.5-pp(均 P<.05)。
临床流程整合的措施与员工对质量和体验的更高评价相关。需要采取行动来改善医疗系统内外的医疗保健整合。