Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;65:120.e1-120.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
Neighborhood environment is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of cardiovascular health (CVH) among Black adults. Most research to date has focused on negative aspects of the neighborhood environment, with little attention being paid to the specific positive features, in particular the social environment, that promote cardiovascular resilience among Black adults.We examined whether better neighborhood physical and social characteristics are associated with ideal CVH among Black adults, as measured by Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores.
We recruited 392 Black adults (age 53 ± 10 years, 39% men) without known CV disease living in Atlanta, GA. Seven neighborhood domains were assessed via questionnaire: asthetic quality, walking environment, safety, food access, social cohesion, activity with neighbors, and violence. CVH was determined by LS7 scores calculated from measured blood pressure; glucose; cholesterol; body mass index (BMI); and self-reported exercise, diet, and smoking, and categorized into poor (0-8), intermediate (9-10), and ideal (11-14). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the association between neighborhood characteristics and the odds of intermediate/ideal CVH categories compared with poor CVH after adjustment for age, gender, household income, education, marital status, and employment status.
Better scores in the neighborhood domains of social cohesion and activity with neighbors were significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of ideal LS7 scores (OR 2.02, 95% CI [1.36-3.01] and 1.71 [1.20-2.45] per 1 standard deviation [SD] increase in respective scores). These associations were stronger for both social cohesion (OR 2.61, 95% CI [1.48-4.61] vs. 1.40 [0.82-2.40]) and activity with neighbors (OR 1.82, 95% CI [1.15-2.86] vs. 1.53 [0.84-2.78]) in Black women than men. Specifically, better scores in social cohesion were associated with higher odds of ideal CVH in exercise (OR 1.73 [1.16-2.59]), diet (OR 1.90 [1.11-3.26]), and BMI (OR 1.52 [1.09-2.09]); better scores in activity with neighbors were also similarly associated with higher odds of ideal CVH in exercise (OR 1.48 [1.00-2.19]), diet (OR 2.15 [1.23-3.77]), and BMI (OR 1.45 [1.07-1.98]; per 1 SD in respective scores).
More desirable neighborhood characteristics, particularly social cohesion and activity with neighbors, were associated with better CVH among Black adults.
邻里环境越来越被认为是影响黑人群体心血管健康(CVH)的重要决定因素。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在邻里环境的负面方面,而很少关注促进黑人群体心血管适应能力的具体积极特征,特别是社会环境。我们研究了在没有已知心血管疾病的亚特兰大生活的 392 名黑人群体(年龄 53±10 岁,39%为男性)中,更好的邻里物理和社会特征是否与 LS7 评分测量的理想 CVH 相关。
我们招募了 392 名没有已知 CV 疾病的黑人群体(年龄 53±10 岁,39%为男性),居住在佐治亚州亚特兰大。通过问卷评估了七个邻里领域:审美质量、步行环境、安全性、食物获取、社会凝聚力、与邻居的活动以及暴力。通过测量血压、血糖、胆固醇、体重指数(BMI)以及自我报告的运动、饮食和吸烟来确定 CVH,并分为差(0-8)、中等(9-10)和理想(11-14)。多变量逻辑回归用于检查邻里特征与中间/理想 CVH 类别之间的关联,与 LS7 评分较差的 CVH 相比,调整后的优势比(OR)为 2.02(95%置信区间[CI]:[1.36-3.01])和 1.71(95%CI:[1.20-2.45])每增加 1 个标准偏差(SD)分别增加相应的分数)。在社会凝聚力(OR 2.61,95%CI [1.48-4.61] vs. 1.40 [0.82-2.40])和与邻居的活动(OR 1.82,95%CI [1.15-2.86] vs. 1.53 [0.84-2.78])方面,这些关联在女性中比男性更强。具体而言,社会凝聚力评分较高与运动(OR 1.73 [1.16-2.59])、饮食(OR 1.90 [1.11-3.26])和 BMI(OR 1.52 [1.09-2.09])的理想 CVH 更高几率相关;与邻居的活动评分较高也与运动(OR 1.48 [1.00-2.19])、饮食(OR 2.15 [1.23-3.77])和 BMI(OR 1.45 [1.07-1.98])的理想 CVH 更高几率相关;在各自的评分中,每增加 1 个 SD。
更理想的邻里特征,特别是社会凝聚力和与邻居的活动,与黑人群体的 CVH 更好相关。