Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Box G-S121-8, 02912, Providence, RI, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;22(1):1890. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14270-x.
Psychosocial stressors increase the risks for cardiovascular disease across diverse populations. However, neighborhood level resilience resources may protect against poor cardiovascular health (CVH). This study used data from three CVH cohorts to examine longitudinally the associations of a resilience resource, perceived neighborhood social cohesion (hereafter referred to as neighborhood social cohesion), with the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7), and whether psychosocial stressors modify observed relationships.
We examined neighborhood social cohesion (measured in tertiles) and LS7 in the Jackson Heart Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America study. We used repeated-measures, modified Poisson regression models to estimate the relationship between neighborhood social cohesion and LS7 (primary analysis, n = 6,086) and four biological metrics (body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol, blood glucose; secondary analysis, n = 7,291). We assessed effect measure modification by each psychosocial stressor (e.g., low educational attainment, discrimination).
In primary analyses, adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ideal/intermediate versus poor CVH among high or medium (versus low) neighborhood social cohesion were 1.01 (0.97-1.05) and 1.02 (0.98-1.06), respectively. The psychosocial stressors, low education and discrimination, functioned as effect modifiers. Secondary analyses showed similar findings. Also, in the secondary analyses, there was evidence for effect modification by income.
We did not find much support for an association between neighborhood social cohesion and LS7, but did find evidence of effect modification. Some of the effect modification results operated in unexpected directions. Future studies should examine neighborhood social cohesion more comprehensively and assess for effect modification by psychosocial stressors.
心理社会压力源会增加不同人群患心血管疾病的风险。然而,邻里层面的适应资源可能有助于预防心血管健康不良。本研究使用三个心血管健康队列的数据,从纵向角度检验了适应资源(感知邻里社会凝聚力,下文简称邻里社会凝聚力)与美国心脏协会的“生命的简单 7 项”(LS7)之间的关联,以及心理社会压力源是否会改变这种关联。
我们在“杰克逊心脏研究”“多民族动脉粥样硬化研究”和“南亚裔美国人动脉粥样硬化中介物研究”中,对邻里社会凝聚力(以三分位数衡量)和 LS7 进行了检测。我们采用重复测量、修正泊松回归模型,对邻里社会凝聚力与 LS7(主要分析,n=6086)和四项生物学指标(体重指数、血压、胆固醇、血糖;次要分析,n=7291)之间的关系进行了估计。我们通过每个心理社会压力源(如教育程度低、歧视)来评估效应修正量。
在主要分析中,高或中(与低)邻里社会凝聚力水平下,理想/中等与不良心血管健康的调整后患病率比(aPR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 1.01(0.97-1.05)和 1.02(0.98-1.06)。心理社会压力源(教育程度低和歧视)是效应修正因子。次要分析显示出相似的结果。此外,在次要分析中,收入也存在效应修正的证据。
我们没有发现邻里社会凝聚力与 LS7 之间存在显著关联,但确实发现了效应修正的证据。一些效应修正结果的方向出乎意料。未来的研究应更全面地评估邻里社会凝聚力,并检验心理社会压力源的效应修正。