• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛患者抑郁量表的 Rasch 验证。

Rasch validation of the Depression Scale among patients with low back pain.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Central Finland Health Care District Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Central Finland Health Care District Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(2):261-267. doi: 10.3233/BMR-191638.

DOI:10.3233/BMR-191638
PMID:33285622
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Depression Scale (DEPS) is a commonly used screening tool for major depression in studies investigating low back pain, yet it has not been validated for patients with back-specific problems.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the psychometric properties of the DEPS in patients with degenerative spinal disease.

METHODS

Six hundred and thirty-seven patients with a degenerative spinal disease completed the DEPS instrument. The Rasch Measurement Theory was applied to analyze the measurement properties of the DEPS. The main hypothesis-driven approach was whether the DEPS would meet relevant psychometric criteria for assessing depressive symptoms among patients with degenerative spinal disease.

RESULTS

The Mean (SD) DEPS score was 9.2 (6.6). Scale minimum or maximum points among participants were 2.4% and 0.8%, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.92. Person Separation Index for reliability was 0.88. All items had ordered thresholds and seven of the 10 items had good item fit. Unidimensionality of the DEPS was supported (proportion of significant t-tests, 4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the validity of the DEPS for screening depressive symptoms in patients with degenerative spinal disease.

摘要

背景

抑郁量表(DEPS)是研究腰痛时常用的一种主要抑郁症筛查工具,但尚未针对特定于背部的问题患者进行验证。

目的

评估 DEPS 在退行性脊柱疾病患者中的心理测量特性。

方法

637 名退行性脊柱疾病患者完成了 DEPS 量表。应用 Rasch 测量理论分析 DEPS 的测量特性。主要的假设驱动方法是 DEPS 是否符合评估退行性脊柱疾病患者抑郁症状的相关心理测量标准。

结果

DEPS 的平均(标准差)得分为 9.2(6.6)。参与者的量表最低或最高分为 2.4%和 0.8%。内部一致性的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.92。可靠性的个体分离指数为 0.88。所有项目均具有有序阈值,其中 10 个项目中的 7 个具有良好的项目拟合度。DEPS 的单维性得到支持(显著 t 检验的比例为 4.5%)。

结论

本研究支持 DEPS 在筛查退行性脊柱疾病患者抑郁症状方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Rasch validation of the Depression Scale among patients with low back pain.腰痛患者抑郁量表的 Rasch 验证。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(2):261-267. doi: 10.3233/BMR-191638.
2
Diagnosing depression in primary care: a Rasch analysis of the Major Depression Inventory.在初级保健中诊断抑郁症:使用 Major Depression Inventory 进行的 Rasch 分析。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):256-263. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608039. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Diagnosing depression in primary care: a Rasch analysis of the major depression inventory.在初级保健中诊断抑郁症:对主要抑郁量表的拉施分析
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):105-112. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1568703. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.使用 Rasch 分析对改良后的 Kessler 七项版本(K7)进行心理困扰测量的心理计量学评估:孟加拉国农村地区的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034523.
5
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Validation of the Japanese Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire in Patients with Low Back Pain.日本版弗里曼特尔背部疼痛问卷在腰痛患者中的效度验证。
Pain Pract. 2018 Feb;18(2):170-179. doi: 10.1111/papr.12586. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
9
Assessment of Construct Validity of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Scoliosis Research Society-30 Questionnaire (SRS-30) in Patients With Degenerative Spinal Disease.退行性脊柱疾病患者中Oswestry功能障碍指数和脊柱侧弯研究协会-30问卷(SRS-30)的结构效度评估
Spine Deform. 2019 Nov;7(6):929-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2019.04.008.
10
Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain.医院焦虑抑郁量表在急性腰痛患者中的效度验证
J Pain. 2015 Oct;16(10):1012-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Length of mobile phone use mediating the effect of major depression on low back pain/sciatica: a mendelian randomization study.手机使用时长介导重度抑郁症对腰痛/坐骨神经痛的影响:一项孟德尔随机化研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09099-y.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Psychophysical Validation of the Pain and Sleep Questionnaire Three-Item Index in Finnish.芬兰语版疼痛与睡眠问卷三项指标的跨文化适应、信度及心理物理学验证
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 23;10(21):4887. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214887.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control.
中重度敏感化量表芬兰语版的跨文化调适与验证及其与头晕和姿势控制的关系。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02151-6.