• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自行车道网络扩展是否具有成本效益?对奥斯陆自行车运动的健康经济评估。

Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Post box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5
PMID:33287754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7720509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expansion of designated cycling networks increases cycling for transport that, in turn, increases physical activity, contributing to improvement in public health. This paper aims to determine whether cycle-network construction in a large city is cost-effective when compared to the status-quo. We developed a cycle-network investment model (CIM) for Oslo and explored its impact on overall health and wellbeing resulting from the increased physical activity.

METHODS

First, we applied a regression technique on cycling data from 123 major European cities to model the effect of additional cycle-networks on the share of cyclists. Second, we used a Markov model to capture health benefits from increased cycling for people starting to ride cycle at the age of 30 over the next 25 years. All health gains were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were estimated in US dollars. Other data to populate the model were derived from a comprehensive literature search of epidemiological and economic evaluation studies. Uncertainty was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Our regression analysis reveals that a 100 km new cycle network construction in Oslo city would increase cycling share by 3%. Under the base-case assumptions, where the benefits of the cycle-network investment relating to increased physical activity are sustained over 25 years, the predicted average increases in costs and QALYs per person are $416 and 0.019, respectively. Thus, the incremental costs are $22,350 per QALY gained. This is considered highly cost-effective in a Norwegian setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the use of CIM as part of a public health program to improve physical activity and consequently avert morbidity and mortality. CIM is affordable and has a long-term effect on physical activity that in turn has a positive impact on health improvement.

摘要

背景

指定自行车网络的扩展增加了用于交通的自行车出行,进而增加了身体活动,有助于改善公众健康。本文旨在确定与现状相比,在大城市建设自行车网络是否具有成本效益。我们为奥斯陆开发了一个自行车网络投资模型(CIM),并探讨了其对由于身体活动增加而导致的整体健康和福利的影响。

方法

首先,我们应用回归技术对来自 123 个主要欧洲城市的自行车数据进行了分析,以模拟额外自行车网络对自行车出行比例的影响。其次,我们使用马尔可夫模型来捕捉因 30 岁开始骑自行车的人在未来 25 年内增加骑自行车而带来的健康益处。所有健康收益均以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量。成本以美元计。用于填充模型的其他数据源自对流行病学和经济评估研究的全面文献检索。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析评估不确定性。

结果

我们的回归分析表明,在奥斯陆市新建 100 公里自行车网络将使自行车出行比例增加 3%。在基本情况下,假设自行车网络投资增加身体活动的效益持续 25 年,预计每人的成本和 QALY 平均增加分别为 416 美元和 0.019。因此,每获得一个 QALY 的增量成本为 22,350 美元。在挪威的背景下,这被认为是极具成本效益的。

结论

结果支持使用 CIM 作为改善身体活动从而避免发病率和死亡率的公共卫生计划的一部分。CIM 具有成本效益,对身体活动具有长期影响,进而对健康改善产生积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/ff7e83c6d804/12889_2020_9764_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/23f7709bfd52/12889_2020_9764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/2c9bdc25c75d/12889_2020_9764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/93d329ec0f46/12889_2020_9764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/ff7e83c6d804/12889_2020_9764_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/23f7709bfd52/12889_2020_9764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/2c9bdc25c75d/12889_2020_9764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/93d329ec0f46/12889_2020_9764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7396/7720509/ff7e83c6d804/12889_2020_9764_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo.自行车道网络扩展是否具有成本效益?对奥斯陆自行车运动的健康经济评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5.
2
3
4
Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities.欧洲城市自行车网络扩展的健康影响评估。
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: a short report.基层医疗中运动转诊计划的系统评价与经济评估:简短报告
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(60):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta19600.
6
Five-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) physical activity intervention for men versus no intervention.欧洲男性球迷体能训练(EuroFIT)干预与不干预的 5 年成本效益分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 4;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00934-7.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
8
Cycle-network expansion plan in Oslo: Modeling cost-effectiveness analysis and health equity impact.奥斯陆自行车网络扩展计划:成本效益分析和健康公平影响建模。
Health Econ. 2021 Dec;30(12):3220-3235. doi: 10.1002/hec.4435. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of offering free leisure centre memberships to physically inactive members of the public receiving state benefits: a case study.为领取国家福利的缺乏身体活动的公众提供免费休闲中心会员资格的成本效益分析:一项案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:616. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3300-x.
10
The cost-effectiveness of bike lanes in New York City.纽约市自行车道的成本效益。
Inj Prev. 2017 Aug;23(4):239-243. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042057. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage.探索建成环境与地铁导向无桩共享单车使用的多尺度关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042323.
2
Prevalence and patterns of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and their association with health-related quality of life within a multi-ethnic Asian population.在一个多民族亚洲人群中,身体活动、久坐行为的流行率和模式及其与健康相关生活质量的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):1939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11902-6.
3
The Health Cost of Transport in Cities.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical inactivity: productivity losses and healthcare costs 2002 and 2016 in Sweden.身体活动不足:2002年和2016年瑞典的生产力损失及医疗保健成本
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Oct 18;4(1):e000451. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000451. eCollection 2018.
2
Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise: JACC Health Promotion Series.促进身体活动和锻炼:JACC 健康促进系列。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):1622-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2141.
3
A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits.
城市交通的健康成本。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2021 Jun;8(2):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s40572-021-00308-6. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
主动出行干预措施的成本效益分析,具有健康和减少碳排放效益。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 11;15(5):962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050962.
4
Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities.欧洲城市自行车网络扩展的健康影响评估。
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitors vs. ezetimibe through LDL-C reductions in a Norwegian setting.在挪威环境下,通过 LDL-C 降低来模拟 PCSK9 抑制剂与依折麦布的成本效益。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):15-22. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvx010.
6
Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study.主动通勤与心血管疾病、癌症和死亡率发生的相关性:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2017 Apr 19;357:j1456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1456.
7
Cost of diabetes in Norway 2011.2011年挪威糖尿病的成本。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Dec;122:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Quantifying the Association Between Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.量化身体活动与心血管疾病和糖尿病之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 14;5(9):e002495. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002495.
9
The cost-effectiveness of bike lanes in New York City.纽约市自行车道的成本效益。
Inj Prev. 2017 Aug;23(4):239-243. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042057. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
Cycling and Diabetes Prevention: Practice-Based Evidence for Public Health Action.骑行与糖尿病预防:基于实践的公共卫生行动证据
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 12;13(7):e1002077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002077. eCollection 2016 Jul.