• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索建成环境与地铁导向无桩共享单车使用的多尺度关系。

Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage.

机构信息

School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Institute of Land Resources and Coastal Zone, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042323.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042323
PMID:35206509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8877844/
Abstract

Dockless bike-sharing systems have become one of the important transport methods for urban residents as they can effectively expand the metro's service area. We applied the ordinary least square (OLS) model, the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model and the multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model to capture the spatial relationship between the urban built environment and the usage of bike-sharing connected to the metro. A case study in Beijing, China, was conducted. The empirical result demonstrates that the MGWR model can explain the varieties of spatial relationship more precisely than the OLS model and the GWR model. The result also shows that, among the proposed built environment factors, the integrated usage of bike-sharing and metro is mainly affected by the distance to central business district (CBD), the Hotels-Residences points of interest (POI) density, and the road density. It is noteworthy that the effect of population density on dockless bike-sharing usage is only significant at weekends. In addition, the effects of the built environment variables on dockless bike-sharing usage also vary across space. A common feature is that most of the built environment factors have a more obvious impact on the metro-oriented dockless bike-sharing usage in the eastern part of the study area. This finding can provide support for governments and urban planners to efficiently develop a bike-sharing-friendly built environment that promotes the integration of bike-sharing and metro.

摘要

无桩共享单车系统已成为城市居民的重要交通方式之一,因为它们可以有效地扩大地铁的服务范围。我们应用普通最小二乘法(OLS)模型、地理加权回归(GWR)模型和多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)模型来捕捉城市建成环境与与地铁相连的共享单车使用之间的空间关系。以中国北京为例进行了实证研究。实证结果表明,MGWR 模型比 OLS 模型和 GWR 模型更能准确地解释空间关系的多样性。结果还表明,在所提出的建成环境因素中,共享单车与地铁的综合使用主要受距离中心商务区(CBD)、酒店-住宅兴趣点(POI)密度和道路密度的影响。值得注意的是,人口密度对无桩共享单车使用的影响仅在周末显著。此外,建成环境变量对无桩共享单车使用的影响在空间上也存在差异。一个共同的特点是,大多数建成环境因素对研究区域东部以地铁为导向的无桩共享单车使用的影响更为明显。这一发现可以为政府和城市规划者提供支持,以有效地开发有利于共享单车发展的建成环境,促进共享单车与地铁的融合。

相似文献

1
Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage.探索建成环境与地铁导向无桩共享单车使用的多尺度关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042323.
2
Exploring built environment factors on e-bike travel behavior in urban China: A case study of Jinan.探究中国城市电动自行车出行行为的建成环境因素:以济南为例。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;10:1013421. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1013421. eCollection 2022.
3
Bike Share Usage and the Built Environment: A Review.自行车共享使用与建成环境:综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:848169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.848169. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Psychological Factors on Modal Shift from Car to Dockless Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Nanjing, China.心理因素对小汽车向共享单车出行方式转移的影响:以中国南京为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 14;16(18):3420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183420.
5
Moderation Effects of Streetscape Perceptions on the Associations Between Accessibility, Land Use Mix, and Bike-Sharing Use: Cross-Sectional Study.街道景观感知对可达性、土地利用混合度与共享单车使用之间关联的调节作用:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 3;10:e58761. doi: 10.2196/58761.
6
Exploring the spatial relationship of e-bike and motorcycle crashes: Implications for risk reduction.探索电动自行车与摩托车碰撞事故的空间关系:对降低风险的启示。
J Safety Res. 2024 Feb;88:199-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
7
Built environment effects on bike crash frequency and risk in Beijing.北京市建成环境对自行车碰撞频率和风险的影响。
J Safety Res. 2018 Feb;64:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
8
Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea.新冠疫情对韩国首尔共享单车使用情况的影响。
Cities. 2022 Nov;130:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
9
Does bike-sharing reduce traffic congestion? Evidence from three mega-cities in China.共享单车能否缓解交通拥堵?来自中国三个特大城市的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0306317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306317. eCollection 2024.
10
Restorative perception of urban streets: Interpretation using deep learning and MGWR models.城市街道的修复感知:深度学习和 MGWR 模型的解释。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1141630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141630. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring usage pattern variation of free-floating bike-sharing from a night travel perspective.从夜间出行角度探索无桩共享单车的使用模式变化
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66564-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo.自行车道网络扩展是否具有成本效益?对奥斯陆自行车运动的健康经济评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5.
2
Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe.欧洲共享单车系统的健康影响。
Environ Int. 2018 Jun;115:387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
3
Epidemiology of cycling for exercise, recreation or sport in Australia and its contribution to health-enhancing physical activity.
澳大利亚用于锻炼、休闲或运动的骑行流行病学及其对增进健康的身体活动的贡献。
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity.每日步行和骑自行车上班:它们作为促进健康的身体活动的效用。
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Apr;33(1 Suppl):S87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00013-5.