Fulbrook Centre, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Research and Development, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Ilford, United Kingdom; Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jul;22(7):1403-1409.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
To compare online cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with and without telephone support respectively to online psychoeducation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in caregivers of people with dementia with mild anxiety or depression.
Three-arm parallel-group RCT comparing online CBT with and without telephone support respectively to online psychoeducation.
Online study with caregivers of people with dementia.
The primary outcome measure was mental health measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); the Relative Stress Scale (RSS) and the Short Sense of Competency Questionnaire. The primary analysis focused on people completing GHQ-12 at both baseline and 26 weeks, evaluated using analysis of covariance.
638 people were randomized to the 3 treatment arms, of whom 208 were included in the analysis population. There were significant improvements in GHQ-12 in all treatment arms compared to baseline (P < .001 for all interventions), but neither CBT with nor without telephone support conferred any significant advantage compared to psychoeducation. For the secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between CBT with telephone support and psychoeducation, but CBT without telephone support was less effective than psychoeducation with respect to HADS depression subscale [mean difference 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61, 3.11; P = .004] and caregiver stress (RSS mean difference 3.11, 95% CI 0.13, 6.09; P = .04). Good safety was achieved in all 3 treatment arms, with no deaths or serious adverse events.
Online CBT with telephone support and psychoeducation both achieved significant benefits over 26 weeks compared with baseline in mental health and mood, but there were no advantages for CBT compared with the psychoeducation intervention. CBT without telephone support was less effective with respect to mood outcomes than psychoeducation and should not be recommended based on current evidence.
在一项针对轻度焦虑或抑郁的痴呆症患者照顾者的随机对照试验(RCT)中,比较在线认知行为疗法(CBT)与电话支持、在线心理教育的效果。
三臂平行组 RCT,比较在线 CBT 与电话支持、在线心理教育的效果。
在线研究,对象为痴呆症患者的照顾者。
主要结局指标为 26 周时使用一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)测量的心理健康状况。次要结局指标包括医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、相对压力量表(RSS)和简短感知能力问卷。主要分析侧重于基线和 26 周时均完成 GHQ-12 的人群,采用协方差分析进行评估。
共有 638 人被随机分配到 3 个治疗组,其中 208 人纳入分析人群。与基线相比,所有治疗组的 GHQ-12 均有显著改善(所有干预措施 P<.001),但 CBT 与电话支持或无电话支持均未优于心理教育。对于次要结局,CBT 与电话支持和心理教育之间无显著差异,但 CBT 无电话支持在 HADS 抑郁分量表(平均差值 1.86,95%置信区间 0.61,3.11;P=.004)和照顾者压力(RSS 平均差值 3.11,95%置信区间 0.13,6.09;P=.04)方面的效果不如心理教育。在所有 3 个治疗组中均实现了良好的安全性,无死亡或严重不良事件发生。
在线 CBT 与电话支持和心理教育在 26 周时与基线相比均显著改善了心理健康和情绪,但 CBT 与心理教育干预相比没有优势。与心理教育相比,无电话支持的 CBT 在情绪结局方面效果较差,因此基于现有证据不推荐使用。