Tichenor Anna A, Cofield Stacey S, Gann Drew, Elder Marian, Ng Alison, Walsh Karen, Jones Lyndon W, Nichols Jason J
Indiana University (A.A.T.), School of Optometry, Bloomington, IN; University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry (S.S.C., J.J.N.), Birmingham, AL; EyeCare Associates (D.G.), Hueytown, Alabama; Centre for Ocular Research and Education (CORE) (M.E., A.N., K.W., L.W.J.), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada ; and Centre for Eye and Vision Research (LWJ), Hong Kong.
Eye Contact Lens. 2021 May 1;47(5):277-282. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000761.
To retrospectively compare frequency of contact lens (CL) complications in soft CL users of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and multipurpose solutions (MPS).
This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review of CL records from each patient's three most recent eye examinations at academic and private practices. Patients must have used the same solution type for at least 3 years. Univariate analyses were conducted using t tests, and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical measures.
There were 1,137 patients included, with 670 (59%) using MPS and 467 (41%) H2O2. In total, 706 (62%) experienced at least one complication; 409 used MPS and 297 used H2O2. There was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing at least one complication between MPS (61%) and H2O2 (64%) (P=0.38). Multipurpose solutions users were more likely to report discomfort compared with H2O2 users (P=0.04). Presumed microbial keratitis was experienced by 16 MPS and nine H2O2 users (P=0.60).
No significant differences were found in the frequency of CL complications between MPS and H2O2. H2O2 users were less likely to report discomfort and thus switching to a H2O2 system may be an alternative in CL users with discomfort.
回顾性比较使用过氧化氢(H2O2)和多功能护理液(MPS)的软性隐形眼镜(CL)使用者中隐形眼镜并发症的发生率。
这是一项多中心回顾性图表审查,回顾了学术机构和私人诊所中每位患者最近三次眼部检查的CL记录。患者必须使用同一种护理液类型至少3年。使用t检验进行单因素分析,对于分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。
共纳入1137例患者,其中670例(59%)使用MPS,467例(41%)使用H2O2。总计706例(62%)经历了至少一种并发症;409例使用MPS,297例使用H2O2。MPS组(61%)和H2O2组(64%)中经历至少一种并发症的患者比例无差异(P = 0.38)。与H2O2使用者相比,MPS使用者更有可能报告不适(P = 0.04)。16例MPS使用者和9例H2O2使用者发生疑似微生物性角膜炎(P = 0.60)。
MPS和H2O2在CL并发症发生率方面未发现显著差异。H2O2使用者报告不适的可能性较小,因此对于有不适症状的CL使用者,改用H2O2护理系统可能是一种选择。