Falster Kathleen, Hanly Mark, Edwards Ben, Banks Emily, Lynch John W, Eades Sandra, Nickel Nathan, Goldfeld Sharon, Biddle Nicholas
School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
ANU Centre for Social Research Methods, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Dec 8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214672.
Policies to increase Australian Indigenous children's participation in preschool aim to reduce developmental inequities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children. This study aims to understand the benefits of preschool participation by quantifying the association between preschool participation in the year before school and developmental outcomes at age five in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children.
We used data from perinatal, hospital, birth registration and school enrolment records, and the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC), for 7384 Indigenous and 95 104 non-Indigenous children who started school in New South Wales, Australia in 2009/2012. Preschool in the year before school was recorded in the AEDC. The outcome was developmental vulnerability on ≥1 of five AEDC domains, including physical health, emotional maturity, social competence, language/cognitive skills and communication skills/general knowledge.
5051 (71%) Indigenous and 68 998 (74%) non-Indigenous children attended preschool. Among Indigenous children, 33% of preschool attenders and 44% of the home-based care group were vulnerable on ≥1 domains, compared with 17% of preschool attenders and 33% in the home-based care group among non-Indigenous children. In the whole population model, the adjusted risk difference for developmental vulnerability among preschool attenders was -7.9 percentage points (95% CI, -9.8 to -6.1) in non-Indigenous children and -2.8 percentage points (95% CI -4.8 to -0.7) in Indigenous children, compared with Indigenous children in home-based care.
Our findings suggest a likely beneficial effect of preschool participation on developmental outcomes, although the magnitude of the benefit was less among Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous children.
旨在提高澳大利亚原住民儿童学前教育参与率的政策,旨在减少原住民儿童与非原住民儿童之间的发育不平等。本研究旨在通过量化学前一年的学前教育参与情况与原住民和非原住民儿童五岁时发育结果之间的关联,来了解学前教育参与的益处。
我们使用了围产期、医院、出生登记和学校入学记录以及澳大利亚早期发展普查(AEDC)的数据,这些数据来自2009/2012年在澳大利亚新南威尔士州开始上学的7384名原住民儿童和95104名非原住民儿童。AEDC记录了学前一年的学前教育情况。结果指标是在AEDC五个领域中至少一个领域存在发育脆弱性,包括身体健康、情绪成熟度、社交能力、语言/认知技能以及沟通技能/常识。
5051名(71%)原住民儿童和68998名(74%)非原住民儿童接受了学前教育。在原住民儿童中,33%的学前教育参与者和44%的家庭照料组儿童在至少一个领域存在脆弱性,相比之下,非原住民儿童中学前教育参与者的这一比例为17%,家庭照料组为33%。在总体人群模型中,与接受家庭照料的原住民儿童相比,学前教育参与者中发育脆弱性的调整风险差异在非原住民儿童中为-7.9个百分点(95%置信区间,-9.8至-6.1),在原住民儿童中为-2.8个百分点(95%置信区间-4.8至-0.7)。
我们的研究结果表明,学前教育参与对发育结果可能有有益影响,尽管与非原住民儿童相比,原住民儿童的受益程度较小。