• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔介入治疗患者胸痛的最小临床重要差异。

Minimal clinically important difference for chest discomfort in patients undergoing pleural interventions.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Allergy, Pulmonary, & Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000667.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000667
PMID:33293362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7722832/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Therapeutic thoracentesis is among the most frequently performed medical procedures. Chest discomfort is a common complication and has been associated with increasingly negative pleural pressure as fluid is withdrawn in the setting of non-expendable lung. Visual analogue scales (VASs) are commonly employed to measure changes in discomfort and dyspnoea related to pleural interventions. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as the smallest change in VAS score associated with patient report of significant change in a symptom, is required to interpret the results of studies using VAS scores and is used in clinical trial power calculations. The MCID for chest discomfort in patients undergoing pleural interventions has not been determined.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from two recent randomised trials of therapeutic thoracentesis were used for this investigation. Adult patients with symptomatic pleural effusions referred for therapeutic thoracentesis were enrolled across ten US academic medical centres. Patients were asked to rate their level of chest discomfort on 100 mm VAS before, during and following thoracentesis. Patients then completed a 7-point Likert scale indicating the significance of any change in chest discomfort from preprocedure to postprocedure. The mean difference between discomfort 5 min postprocedure and discomfort just prior to the start of pleural fluid drainage was categorised by Likert scale response.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 262 thoracenteses were included in the analysis. Thirty-four of 262 patients experienced a 'small but significant increase' or a 'large or moderate increase' in discomfort following thoracentesis. The mean increase in VAS score in those reporting a 'small but significant increase' in chest discomfort (n=23) was 16 mm (SD 22.44, 95% CI 6.87 to 25.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The MCID for thoracentesis-related chest discomfort measured by 100 mm VAS is 16 mm. This MCID specific to discomfort resulting from pleural fluid interventions can inform the design and analysis of future pleural intervention studies.

摘要

背景

治疗性胸腔穿刺术是最常进行的医疗程序之一。胸部不适是一种常见的并发症,并且与非扩张性肺中抽出液体时胸膜压力的逐渐下降有关。视觉模拟量表(VAS)常用于测量与胸膜介入相关的不适和呼吸困难的变化。最小临床重要差异(MCID)是指与患者报告的症状显著变化相关的 VAS 评分的最小变化,需要解释使用 VAS 评分进行的研究结果,并用于临床试验的效能计算。尚未确定接受胸膜介入治疗的患者的胸部不适的 MCID。

方法

本研究使用了两项最近的治疗性胸腔穿刺术随机试验的前瞻性收集数据。来自十个美国学术医疗中心的有症状胸腔积液的成年患者接受了治疗性胸腔穿刺术。在胸腔穿刺术前、术中及术后,患者使用 100mm VAS 评估其胸部不适程度。然后,患者使用 7 分 Likert 量表表示术前至术后胸部不适程度变化的重要程度。术后 5 分钟时与刚开始引流胸腔积液时相比,VAS 评分的平均差异按 Likert 量表反应进行分类。

结果

共纳入了 262 例胸腔穿刺术的数据进行分析。34 例患者(262 例中的 13.6%)在胸腔穿刺术后经历了“小但显著增加”或“大或中度增加”的不适。报告胸部不适“小但显著增加”的患者(n=23)的 VAS 评分平均增加 16mm(SD 22.44,95%CI 6.87 至 25.21)。

结论

VAS 测量的胸腔穿刺术相关胸部不适的 MCID 为 16mm。这一 MCID 是针对胸膜液干预引起的不适而确定的,可为未来的胸膜介入研究的设计和分析提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e587/7722832/9b41818f5598/bmjresp-2020-000667f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e587/7722832/14c6fcb47c67/bmjresp-2020-000667f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e587/7722832/9b41818f5598/bmjresp-2020-000667f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e587/7722832/14c6fcb47c67/bmjresp-2020-000667f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e587/7722832/9b41818f5598/bmjresp-2020-000667f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal clinically important difference for chest discomfort in patients undergoing pleural interventions.胸腔介入治疗患者胸痛的最小临床重要差异。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000667.
2
Routine monitoring with pleural manometry during therapeutic large-volume thoracentesis to prevent pleural-pressure-related complications: a multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial.在治疗性大量胸腔穿刺术中使用胸膜测压法进行常规监测,以预防与胸膜压力相关的并发症:一项多中心、单盲随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):447-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30421-1. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
The relationship of pleural pressure to symptom development during therapeutic thoracentesis.治疗性胸腔穿刺术中胸膜压力与症状发生的关系。
Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1556-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1556.
4
The Impact of Gravity vs Suction-driven Therapeutic Thoracentesis on Pressure-related Complications: The GRAVITAS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.重力与抽吸驱动式治疗性胸腔穿刺术对与压力相关并发症影响的比较:GRAVITAS 多中心随机对照试验。
Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):702-711. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Evaluation of patient-related and procedure-related factors contributing to pneumothorax following thoracentesis.胸腔穿刺术后气胸相关的患者因素和操作因素评估。
Chest. 1999 Jul;116(1):134-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.1.134.
6
Large-volume thoracentesis and the risk of reexpansion pulmonary edema.大量胸腔穿刺术与复张性肺水肿的风险
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov;84(5):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.038.
7
Does this patient have an exudative pleural effusion? The Rational Clinical Examination systematic review.这位患者是否有渗出性胸腔积液?基于系统评价的临床合理检查。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2422-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5552.
8
Complications following symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction.使用抽吸法进行症状限制性胸腔穿刺后的并发症。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 19;56(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02356-2019. Print 2020 Nov.
9
Pleural manometry in patients with pleural diseases - the usefulness in clinical practice.胸膜疾病患者的胸膜测压-在临床实践中的有用性。
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Impact of pleural manometry on the development of chest discomfort during thoracentesis: a symptom-based study.胸腔测压对胸腔穿刺术期间胸部不适发生的影响:一项基于症状的研究。
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 Oct;21(4):306-13. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000095.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Radial Artery Puncture Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.局部麻醉对桡动脉穿刺疼痛的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64682. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review.胸腔积液患者报告的结局:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52430. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Early Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery or Intrapleural Enzyme Therapy in Pleural Infection: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. The Third Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial-MIST-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Gravity vs Suction-driven Therapeutic Thoracentesis on Pressure-related Complications: The GRAVITAS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.重力与抽吸驱动式治疗性胸腔穿刺术对与压力相关并发症影响的比较:GRAVITAS 多中心随机对照试验。
Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):702-711. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
2
Routine monitoring with pleural manometry during therapeutic large-volume thoracentesis to prevent pleural-pressure-related complications: a multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial.在治疗性大量胸腔穿刺术中使用胸膜测压法进行常规监测,以预防与胸膜压力相关的并发症:一项多中心、单盲随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):447-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30421-1. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
早期电视辅助胸腔镜手术或胸腔内酶治疗胸腔感染:一项可行性随机对照试验。第三次多中心胸腔内脓毒症试验-MIST-3。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Dec 15;208(12):1305-1315. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202305-0854OC.
4
Demystifying the Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Context.解读心胸外科背景下最小临床重要差异的价值
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;13(3):716. doi: 10.3390/life13030716.
Outpatient Talc Administration by Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusion.
门诊经留置胸腔导管滑石粉给药治疗恶性胸腔积液。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1313-1322. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716883.
4
How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty.多大的疼痛才算显著?全膝关节置换术后视觉模拟评分的最小临床重要差值定义。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S71-S75.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state.使用视觉模拟评分法测量急性术后疼痛:最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
6
Effect of Opioids vs NSAIDs and Larger vs Smaller Chest Tube Size on Pain Control and Pleurodesis Efficacy Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The TIME1 Randomized Clinical Trial.阿片类药物与非甾体抗炎药及大/小胸腔引流管大小对恶性胸腔积液患者疼痛控制和胸膜固定术疗效的影响:TIME1 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015;314(24):2641-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16840.
7
Defining the minimal important difference for the visual analogue scale assessing dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusions.确定用于评估恶性胸腔积液患者呼吸困难的视觉模拟量表的最小重要差异。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123798. eCollection 2015.
8
Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale?内异症疼痛评估的系统评价:如何选择量表?
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):136-52. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu046. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
9
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
10
The relationship of pleural pressure to symptom development during therapeutic thoracentesis.治疗性胸腔穿刺术中胸膜压力与症状发生的关系。
Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1556-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1556.