• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和公众对细胞和基因治疗的看法:系统评价。

Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):6265. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1
PMID:33293538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7722871/
Abstract

Cell and gene therapies offer opportunities for treating disease with potential to restore function, and cure disease. However, they are not without risk and pose complex logistical, economic, ethical and social challenges for health systems. Here we report our systematic review of the current evidence on patient and public knowledge and perspectives of cell and gene therapies, to inform future research, education and awareness raising activities. We screened 10,735 titles and abstracts, and evaluated the full texts of 151 publications. The final selection was 35 publications. Four themes were generated from the narrative synthesis of the study findings namely: (1) Knowledge and understanding of cell and gene therapies, (2) Acceptance of cell and gene therapies (3) Understanding of risk and benefits of therapy, and (4) Information needs and current sources of information. As potential funders or future recipients, it is important that the public and patients are aware of these therapies, understand the issues involved, and can contribute to the debate. This review highlights the need for appropriate patient and public education on the various aspects of cell and gene therapies. High quality studies exploring patient and public opinions and experiences of cell and gene therapy are required. Patient and public perceptions of these therapies, alongside evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness, will be central to their uptake and use.

摘要

细胞和基因疗法为用有潜力恢复功能和治愈疾病的方法治疗疾病提供了机会。然而,它们并非没有风险,并且给卫生系统带来了复杂的后勤、经济、伦理和社会挑战。在这里,我们报告了我们对细胞和基因疗法的患者和公众知识和观点的现有证据进行的系统评价,以为未来的研究、教育和提高认识活动提供信息。我们筛选了 10735 个标题和摘要,并评估了 151 篇出版物的全文。最终选择了 35 篇出版物。从研究结果的叙述性综合中产生了四个主题:(1)对细胞和基因疗法的知识和理解,(2)对细胞和基因疗法的接受程度,(3)对治疗风险和益处的理解,以及(4)信息需求和当前信息来源。作为潜在的资助者或未来的接受者,公众和患者了解这些疗法、理解所涉及的问题并能够为辩论做出贡献非常重要。本综述强调了对细胞和基因疗法的各个方面进行适当的患者和公众教育的必要性。需要进行高质量的研究,以探索患者和公众对细胞和基因疗法的意见和经验。这些疗法的患者和公众的看法,以及临床和成本效益的证据,将是其采用和使用的核心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54d/7722871/71d5bc6f7a38/41467_2020_20096_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54d/7722871/71d5bc6f7a38/41467_2020_20096_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54d/7722871/71d5bc6f7a38/41467_2020_20096_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review.患者和公众对细胞和基因治疗的看法:系统评价。
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):6265. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1.
2
Public Acceptability of Gene Therapy and Gene Editing for Human Use: A Systematic Review.公众对人类基因治疗和基因编辑的接受度:系统评价。
Hum Gene Ther. 2020 Jan;31(1-2):20-46. doi: 10.1089/hum.2019.197.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Ethical and Safety Issues of Stem Cell-Based Therapy.基于干细胞的治疗的伦理和安全问题。
Int J Med Sci. 2018 Jan 1;15(1):36-45. doi: 10.7150/ijms.21666. eCollection 2018.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Acceptance of Genetic Engineering Among Adults in the UAE: A Cross-Sectional Study.阿联酋成年人对基因工程的认知、态度及接受度:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 20;17(7):e88365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88365. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Patient and Caregiver Experiences of CAR T Cell Therapy for Blood Cancer in the UK: A Qualitative Study.英国血癌患者及护理人员接受嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法的体验:一项定性研究
Patient. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00757-3.
3
CTAD taskforce: genetic therapies in Alzheimer's disease.CTAD 特别工作组:阿尔茨海默病的基因疗法

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Perceptions of Treatment Benefit and Toxicity in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.晚期癌症患者对治疗获益和毒性的感知:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):e119-e129. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00517. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
"I Want to Do It, But I Want to Make Sure That I Do It Right." Views of Patients with Parkinson's Disease Regarding Early Stem Cell Clinical Trial Participation.“我想参与,但我希望确保我做对了。”帕金森病患者对早期干细胞临床试验参与的看法。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):160-171. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1775721. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Lentiviral gene therapy for X-linked chronic granulomatous disease.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Sep;12(8):100269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100269. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
4
Expectations regarding regenerative medicine and attitudes toward invasive surgical therapies in patients with Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional survey.帕金森病患者对再生医学的期望及对侵入性手术治疗的态度:一项横断面调查。
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2025 May 6;12:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100341. eCollection 2025.
5
"I miss stars, too": a thematic analysis of the experiences of persons with retinitis pigmentosa using Reddit.“我也想念星星”:一项对使用Reddit的视网膜色素变性患者经历的主题分析
J Community Genet. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00796-1.
6
Use and impact of digital technology in supporting health providers deliver care in low- and low-middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.数字技术在支持低收入和中低收入国家医疗服务提供者提供护理方面的应用与影响:一项系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0319190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319190. eCollection 2025.
7
Designer Organs: Ethical Genetic Modifications in the Era of Machine Perfusion.定制器官:机器灌注时代的伦理基因改造
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2025 May;27(1):101-128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062824-121925. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
8
Patient Perceptions of Emerging Gene Therapies for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.致心律失常性右室心肌病新兴基因疗法的患者认知
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024 Dec;17(6):e004759. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004759. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
9
What's in a word? Defining "gene therapy medicines".一个词里包含了什么?定义“基因治疗药物”。
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2024 Oct 21;32(4):101348. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101348. eCollection 2024 Dec 12.
10
Acceptability of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for the Treatment of Periodontitis: A Qualitative Study in France.基于同种异体间充质基质细胞的组织工程治疗牙周炎的可接受性:法国的一项定性研究
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):840-848. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.1208. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
慢病毒基因治疗 X 连锁慢性肉芽肿病。
Nat Med. 2020 Feb;26(2):200-206. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0735-5. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Moving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research.超越特定项目中的患者及公众参与研究。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jan;113(1):16-23. doi: 10.1177/0141076819890551.
5
The therapeutic landscape for cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors.嵌合抗原受体工程化细胞的治疗景观。
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Feb;38(2):233-244. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0329-2. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
'Off-the-shelf' allogeneic CAR T cells: development and challenges.现成的异体嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞:开发与挑战。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 Mar;19(3):185-199. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0051-2. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Stem cells: past, present, and future.干细胞:过去、现在和未来。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Feb 26;10(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5.
8
Bridging stem cell research and medicine: a learning health system.连接干细胞研究与医学:一个学习型健康系统。
Regen Med. 2018 Sep;13(6):741-752. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0129. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
What's in a name: are cultured red blood cells 'natural'?名称有何含义:培养的红细胞是“天然的”吗?
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 May;40(4):687-701. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12717. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes on Communication Toward Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine Between the Public and the Scientific Community.公众与科学界对干细胞研究和再生医学沟通态度的比较分析。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Feb;7(2):251-257. doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0184. Epub 2018 Jan 26.