International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05503-8.
In spite of the evident general negative effects of armed conflict on countries' health systems and populations' health outcomes, little is known about similar impacts of conflicts on the spread of antimicrobial resistances (AMR). This review was to address this evidence gap and describe: 1. Patterns of AMR in the Middle East (ME) and resistance profiles of pathogens included in the Global AMR Surveillance System (GLASS) supported by the World Health Organization; 2. Differences in proportions of AMR isolates between conflict and non-conflict countries.
A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and searching five electronic databases. Subject heading and free text were searched for "antimicrobial resistances" and "Middle East", to identify observational studies on AMR published from January 2011 to June 2018. Data were extracted from included articles on a predefined set of variables. Percentages of AMR were analysed as median and interquartile ranges. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
A total of 132 articles met the inclusion criteria. Included studies showed heterogeneity in study design, laboratory methods and standards for interpretation of results, and an overall high risk of bias. Main findings were the following: 1. High proportions of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp. (median 74.2%), and both carbapenem resistance (median 8.1 and 15.4% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae respectively) and ESBL-production (median 32.3 and 27.9% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae respectively) amongst Enterobacteriaceae. S. aureus isolates showed a median methicillin resistance percentage of 45.1%, while vancomycin resistance was almost absent. A median of 50% of the strains of S. pneumoniae showed non-susceptibility to penicillin. 2. Similar trends were observed in conflict and non-conflict affected countries.
There is a lack of standardization in the methodological approach to AMR research in the Middle East. The proportion of antibiotic resistances among specific GLASS pathogens is high, particularly among Acinetobacter spp.
尽管武装冲突对各国卫生系统和民众健康结果造成明显的负面影响已广为人知,但人们对冲突对抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)传播的类似影响知之甚少。本综述旨在填补这一知识空白,并描述:1. 中东(ME)的 AMR 模式和世界卫生组织支持的全球 AMR 监测系统(GLASS)中包含的病原体的耐药情况;2. 冲突国家和非冲突国家之间 AMR 分离株比例的差异。
根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统文献综述,检索五个电子数据库。使用主题词和自由文本搜索“抗微生物药物耐药性”和“中东”,以确定 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间发表的关于 AMR 的观察性研究。从纳入的文章中提取关于预定义变量的数据。AMR 的百分比作为中位数和四分位距进行分析。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。
共有 132 篇文章符合纳入标准。纳入的研究在研究设计、实验室方法和结果解释标准方面存在异质性,总体偏倚风险较高。主要发现如下:1. 不动杆菌属中碳青霉烯类耐药的比例较高(中位数 74.2%),肠杆菌科的碳青霉烯类耐药(大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分别为中位数 8.1%和 15.4%)和 ESBL 产生(大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分别为中位数 32.3%和 27.9%)的比例较高。金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的耐甲氧西林比例中位数为 45.1%,而万古霉素耐药几乎不存在。肺炎链球菌的中位数为 50%的菌株对青霉素不敏感。2. 冲突和非冲突国家也存在类似的趋势。
中东地区对抗微生物药物耐药性研究的方法学方法缺乏标准化。特定 GLASS 病原体的抗生素耐药比例较高,尤其是不动杆菌属。