Vera San Juan Norha, Aceituno David, Djellouli Nehla, Sumray Kirsi, Regenold Nina, Syversen Aron, Mulcahy Symmons Sophie, Dowrick Anna, Mitchinson Lucy, Singleton Georgina, Vindrola-Padros Cecilia
Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab, University College London, UK.
Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Chile.
BJPsych Open. 2020 Dec 10;7(1):e15. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.148.
Substantial evidence has highlighted the importance of considering the mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, and several organisations have issued guidelines with recommendations. However, the definition of well-being and the evidence base behind such guidelines remain unclear.
The aims of the study are to assess the applicability of well-being guidelines in practice, identify unaddressed healthcare workers' needs and provide recommendations for supporting front-line staff during the current and future pandemics.
This paper discusses the findings of a qualitative study based on interviews with front-line healthcare workers in the UK (n = 33), and examines them in relation to a rapid review of well-being guidelines developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 14).
The guidelines placed greater emphasis on individual mental health and psychological support, whereas healthcare workers placed greater emphasis on structural conditions at work, responsibilities outside the hospital and the invaluable support of the community. The well-being support interventions proposed in the guidelines did not always respond to the lived experiences of staff, as some reported not being able to participate in these interventions because of understaffing, exhaustion or clashing schedules.
Healthcare workers expressed well-being needs that aligned with socio-ecological conceptualisations of well-being related to quality of life. This approach to well-being has been highlighted in literature on support of healthcare workers in previous health emergencies, but it has not been monitored during this pandemic. Well-being guidelines should explore the needs of healthcare workers, and contextual characteristics affecting the implementation of recommendations.
大量证据凸显了在新冠疫情期间考虑医护人员心理健康的重要性,一些组织已发布了带有建议的指南。然而,幸福感的定义以及此类指南背后的证据基础仍不明确。
本研究的目的是评估幸福感指南在实践中的适用性,确定未得到满足的医护人员需求,并为在当前及未来疫情期间支持一线工作人员提供建议。
本文讨论了一项定性研究的结果,该研究基于对英国一线医护人员的访谈(n = 33),并结合对针对新冠疫情制定的幸福感指南的快速回顾(n = 14)对结果进行审视。
指南更加强调个人心理健康和心理支持,而医护人员更加强调工作中的结构条件、医院外的职责以及社区的宝贵支持。指南中提出的幸福感支持干预措施并不总是能回应工作人员的实际经历,因为一些人报告称由于人员不足、疲惫或日程冲突而无法参与这些干预措施。
医护人员表达的幸福感需求与与生活质量相关的幸福感社会生态概念相符。这种幸福感方法在以往卫生紧急事件中支持医护人员的文献中已有强调,但在此次疫情期间尚未得到监测。幸福感指南应探索医护人员的需求以及影响建议实施的背景特征。