• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院老年患者与其主要家庭照顾者在临终关怀偏好上的一致性。

Consistency in End-of-Life Care Preferences Between Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.

作者信息

Chuang I-Fei, Shyu Yea-Ing Lotus, Weng Li-Chueh, Huang Hsiu-Li

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 3;14:2377-2387. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S283923. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S283923
PMID:33299304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7721293/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study explored the consistency between preferences for end-of-life care for elderly hospitalized patients and their primary caregivers and predictors of consistency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional correlational study recruited 100 dyads of elderly hospitalized patients and their primary caregivers from a medical center in Central Taiwan. A structural questionnaire about preferences for seven end-of-life medical treatment options involved cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intravenous therapy, nasogastric tube feeding, intensive care unit, blood transfusion, tracheotomy, and hemodialysis.

RESULTS

The consistency was 42.28% for preferences of end-of-life medical care between patients and caregivers. The Kappa values for seven life-sustaining medical treatments ranged from 0.001 to 0.155. Logistic regression showed that the predictors of consistency for preferences of treatment were: a patient with a signed living will (odds ratio [OR] = 6.20, p<0.01) and a male family caregiver (OR= 0.23, p<0.01) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation; a patient who visited relatives in the intensive care unit (OR= 2.94, p< 0.05) and a spouse caregiver (OR= 3.07, p< 0.05) for nasogastric tube feeding; a spouse caregiver (OR=3.12, p<0.05) and a caregiver who visited the intensive care unit (OR= 5.50, p<0.01) for tracheotomy; and a spouse caregiver (OR= 2.76, p<0.05) and a caregiver who visited the intensive care unit (OR= 4.42, p<0.05) for hemodialysis.

CONCLUSION

End-of-life medical treatment preferences were inconsistent between patients and family caregivers, which might be influenced by Asian culture, the nature of the relationship and individual experiences. Implementation of advance care planning that respects the patient's autonomy and preferences about end-of-life care is recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨老年住院患者及其主要照顾者对临终关怀的偏好之间的一致性以及一致性的预测因素。

患者与方法

这项横断面相关性研究从台湾中部的一家医疗中心招募了100对老年住院患者及其主要照顾者。一份关于七种临终医疗治疗选择偏好的结构化问卷,涉及心肺复苏、静脉治疗、鼻饲管喂食、重症监护病房、输血、气管切开术和血液透析。

结果

患者和照顾者在临终医疗护理偏好方面的一致性为42.28%。七种维持生命医疗治疗的Kappa值范围为0.001至0.155。逻辑回归显示,治疗偏好一致性的预测因素为:签署生前预嘱的患者(比值比[OR]=6.20,p<0.01)以及男性家庭照顾者(OR=0.23,p<0.01)对心肺复苏的偏好;在重症监护病房探望过亲属的患者(OR=2.94,p<0.05)以及配偶照顾者(OR=3.07,p<0.05)对鼻饲管喂食的偏好;配偶照顾者(OR=3.12,p<0.05)以及在重症监护病房探望过的照顾者(OR=5.50,p<0.01)对气管切开术的偏好;以及配偶照顾者(OR=2.76,p<0.05)和在重症监护病房探望过的照顾者(OR=4.42,p<0.05)对血液透析的偏好。

结论

患者和家庭照顾者在临终医疗治疗偏好上不一致,这可能受到亚洲文化、关系性质和个人经历的影响。建议实施尊重患者自主权和临终关怀偏好的预先护理计划。

相似文献

1
Consistency in End-of-Life Care Preferences Between Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.住院老年患者与其主要家庭照顾者在临终关怀偏好上的一致性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 3;14:2377-2387. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S283923. eCollection 2020.
2
Terminally Ill Taiwanese Cancer Patients' and Family Caregivers' Agreement on Patterns of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Is Poor to Fair and Declines Over a Decade: Results From Two Independent Cross-Sectional Studies.晚期台湾癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在维持生命治疗偏好模式上的一致性较差且在十年间呈下降趋势:两项独立横断面研究的结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):35-45.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
3
Factors Associated with Patient-Caregiver Concordance about Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.与晚期癌症患者的生命维持治疗偏好的医患一致性相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;40(5):151697. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151697. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
4
Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.台湾晚期癌症患者与其家庭照顾者在临终关怀偏好上的一致性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Dec;30(6):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.05.019.
5
Preferences and Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments of Older Chinese Patients and Their Family Caregivers.老年中国患者及其家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好和态度。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Mar 23;18:467-475. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S395128. eCollection 2023.
6
Depression of Family Caregivers Is Associated with Disagreements on Life-Sustaining Preferences for Treating Patients with Dementia.痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的抑郁与维持生命治疗偏好方面的分歧有关。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0133711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133711. eCollection 2015.
7
Evolution and Predictors of Patient-Caregiver Concordance on States of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Six Months of Life.终末期癌症患者生命最后六个月中维持生命治疗偏好状态的患者-照护者一致性的演变及其预测因素。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;22(1):25-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0307. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
A Decade of Changes in Family Caregivers' Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients at End of Life in the Context of a Family-Oriented Society.在以家庭为导向的社会背景下,临终癌症患者生命末期家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好变化十年
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):907-915.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.326. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Preferences on the Timing of Initiating Advance Care Planning and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment between Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients and Their Main Family Caregivers: A Prospective Study.终末期癌症患者及其主要家庭照顾者对启动预先医疗照护计划和停止生命维持治疗时间的偏好:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7954. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217954.
10
Factors Relating to Caregivers' Preference for Advance Care Planning of Patients in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本照顾者对患者预先护理计划的偏好相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Aug;36(8):727-733. doi: 10.1177/1049909119844517.

引用本文的文献

1
How to make a shared decision with older persons for end-stage kidney disease treatment: the added value of geronto-nephrology.如何与老年人就终末期肾病治疗做出共同决策:老年肾脏病学的附加价值。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Sep 9;17(10):sfae281. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae281. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Goals of Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in the Last Years of Life.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者在生命最后几年的关怀目标。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245866. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5866.
3
Preferences and Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments of Older Chinese Patients and Their Family Caregivers.老年中国患者及其家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好和态度。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Mar 23;18:467-475. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S395128. eCollection 2023.
4
The effect of a family-centered advance care planning intervention for persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers on end-of-life care discussions and decisions.以家庭为中心的认知障碍患者及其家庭照护者的预先医疗照护计划干预对临终关怀讨论和决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274096. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care planning information intervention for persons with mild dementia and their family caregivers: Impact on end-of-life care decision conflicts.轻度认知障碍患者及其家庭照护者的预先医疗照护计划信息干预:对临终关怀决策冲突的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240684. eCollection 2020.
2
Association between Chinese or South Asian ethnicity and end-of-life care in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省的中文或南亚族裔与临终关怀之间的关联。
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 16;192(11):E266-E274. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190655.
3
Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis.支持有多种健康和社会护理需求的老年人共同决策:一个现实主义的综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9.
4
Predictors of advance directives among nursing home residents with dementia.患有痴呆症的养老院居民预先指示的预测因素。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Mar;30(3):341-353. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001661. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
5
Qualitative Study of Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions and Information Preferences About Hospice.患者及照护者对临终关怀的认知与信息偏好的定性研究
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):759-766. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0104. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision.复苏策略应关注患者,而非决策。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 28;356:j813. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j813.
7
Supportive care for older people with frailty in hospital: An integrative review.老年衰弱患者的医院支持性照护:综合评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Do Family Carers Know the Treatment Preferences of People with Early Dementia?痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭护理人员是否了解早期痴呆症患者的治疗偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159056. eCollection 2016.
9
Gender differences in caregiving among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses.精神疾病患者家庭照料者中的性别差异。
World J Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 22;6(1):7-17. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.7.
10
Predictors of self- and caregiver-rated quality of life for people with dementia living in the community and in nursing homes in northern Taiwan.预测居住在台湾北部社区和养老院的痴呆症患者的自我和护理人员生活质量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):825-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002506. Epub 2014 Dec 3.