Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Biomechanics & Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Autism Res. 2021 Jan;14(1):202-219. doi: 10.1002/aur.2453. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
Eighty-seven percent of a large sample of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at risk for motor impairment (Bhat, Physical Therapy, 2020, 100, 633-644). In spite of the high prevalence for motor impairment in children with ASD, it is not considered among the diagnostic criteria or specifiers within DSM-V. In this article, we analyzed the SPARK study dataset (n = 13,887) to examine associations between risk for motor impairment using the Developmental Coordination Disorder-Questionnaire (DCD-Q), social communication impairment using the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), repetitive behavior severity using the Repetitive Behaviors Scale - Revised (RBS-R), and parent-reported categories of cognitive, functional, and language impairments. Upon including children with ASD with cognitive impairments, 88.2% of the SPARK sample was at risk for motor impairment. The relative risk ratio for motor impairment in children with ASD was 22.2 times greater compared to the general population and that risk further increased up to 6.2 with increasing social communication (5.7), functional (6.2), cognitive (3.8), and language (1.6) impairments as well as repetitive behavior severity (5.0). Additionally, the magnitude of risk for motor impairment (fine- and gross-motor) increased with increasing severity of all impairment types with medium to large effects. These findings highlight the multisystem nature of ASD, the need to recognize motor impairments as one of the diagnostic criteria or specifiers for ASD, and the need for appropriate motor screening and assessment of children with ASD. Interventions must address not only the social communication and cognitive/behavioral challenges of children with ASD but also their motor function and participation. LAY ABSTRACT: Eighty-eight percent of the SPARK sample of children with ASD were at risk for motor impairment. The relative risk for motor impairment was 22.2 times greater in children with ASD compared to the general population and the risk increased with more social communication, repetitive behavior, cognitive, and functional impairment. It is important to recognize motor impairments as one of the diagnostic criteria or specifiers for ASD and there is a need to administer appropriate motor screening, assessment, and interventions in children with ASD.
87%的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)大样本儿童存在运动障碍风险(Bhat,物理治疗,2020,100,633-644)。尽管 ASD 儿童的运动障碍患病率很高,但它并不被认为是 DSM-V 中的诊断标准或特征之一。在本文中,我们分析了 SPARK 研究数据集(n=13887),以检查使用发育协调障碍问卷(DCD-Q)评估运动障碍风险、使用社会沟通问卷(SCQ)评估社会沟通障碍、使用重复行为量表修订版(RBS-R)评估重复行为严重程度,以及父母报告的认知、功能和语言障碍类别之间的相关性。纳入有认知障碍的 ASD 儿童后,SPARK 样本中有 88.2%的儿童存在运动障碍风险。与一般人群相比,ASD 儿童运动障碍的相对风险比为 22.2 倍,而随着社会沟通(5.7)、功能(6.2)、认知(3.8)和语言(1.6)障碍以及重复行为严重程度(5.0)的增加,风险进一步增加至 6.2。此外,随着所有类型的障碍严重程度的增加,运动障碍(精细运动和粗大运动)的风险也随之增加,其效应量为中到大。这些发现突出了 ASD 的多系统性质,需要将运动障碍识别为 ASD 的诊断标准或特征之一,以及对 ASD 儿童进行适当的运动筛查和评估的必要性。干预措施必须不仅要解决 ASD 儿童的社会沟通和认知/行为挑战,还要解决他们的运动功能和参与度。
SPARK 样本中 88%的 ASD 儿童存在运动障碍风险。与一般人群相比,ASD 儿童的运动障碍风险比为 22.2 倍,随着社会沟通、重复行为、认知和功能障碍的增加,风险也随之增加。将运动障碍识别为 ASD 的诊断标准或特征之一非常重要,需要对 ASD 儿童进行适当的运动筛查、评估和干预。