Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8767-NP8792. doi: 10.1177/0886260520978198. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
This study provides insight on how sample recruitment methods may affect reported rates of sexual victimization on college campuses. The study compares sexual victimization rates among students who complete surveys after initial requests with those who complete them only after multiple reminders. Using probability sampling methods, undergraduate students from 12 universities were invited to complete a survey on campus violence; initial invitations were followed with up to five reminders. Women ( = 1,008) and men ( = 344) who completed surveys were categorized as early, middle, or late responders based on the number of reminders required to convert them from non-responders to responders. About 24.2% of women and 15.6% of men reported sexual victimization in the previous two months. In initial analyses, female early and late responders did not differ on sexual victimization, but males did. Male late responders reported higher rates of sexual victimization than early responders. In sensitivity analyses that re-defined early and late responders, women who were early responders reported more sexual victimization than women who were late responders, while men who were early responders reported less sexual victimization than men who were late responders. These findings suggest that researchers may underestimate sexual victimization rates for male college students unless multiple attempts are made to solicit their participation. Researchers are encouraged to utilize multiple reminders to increase research participation.
本研究深入探讨了样本招募方法如何影响大学校园中性受害报告率。本研究比较了在初始请求后完成调查的学生与仅在多次提醒后完成调查的学生之间的性受害率。研究采用概率抽样方法,邀请了 12 所大学的本科生在校园内完成一项关于暴力的调查;初始邀请后最多会有五次提醒。根据将非应答者转变为应答者所需的提醒次数,将完成调查的女性(n=1008)和男性(n=344)分为早期、中期和晚期应答者。约 24.2%的女性和 15.6%的男性报告在过去两个月内遭受过性侵害。在初始分析中,女性早期和晚期应答者在性受害方面没有差异,但男性有差异。男性晚期应答者报告的性受害率高于早期应答者。在重新定义早期和晚期应答者的敏感性分析中,早期应答者报告的性受害比晚期应答者多,而早期应答者报告的性受害比晚期应答者少。这些发现表明,除非多次尝试征集他们的参与,否则研究人员可能会低估男大学生的性受害率。鼓励研究人员利用多次提醒来提高研究参与度。