Forsman R Lane
a College of Social Work , Florida State University , Tallahassee , Florida , USA.
J Evid Inf Soc Work. 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):421-432. doi: 10.1080/23761407.2017.1369204. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
The current review provides summary and evaluation of prevalence data for the sexual victimization of college men ages 18 - 24.
Potential studies were selected by searching electronic bibliographic databases. Studies were initially selected for inclusion if they (1) assessed prevalence rates of sexual victimization on college campuses and (2) were published in a scholarly journal (3) in the English language. Utilizing this strategy, 3,973 studies were initially identified, of which 5 underwent complete review.
All 5 studies returned results for sexual victimization of men on college campuses. However, identified prevalence data varies widely from 3.2% - 28.7% of the males surveyed. When incapacitation as a form of victimization was included in the study, college men as a whole appear to be most vulnerable to this form of sexual violence, though sexual minority males may have more heterogeneous experiences of victimization.
Conceptualization of sexual victimization and wording of items attempting to assess prevalence rates likely lead to underestimation of true prevalence. Even with an incomplete understanding of prevalence, results suggest that continuing to assess prevalence may not be the most pressing need at this time. Research into the kinds of victimization college men face as well as education, prevention, and intervention within these areas may likely do more to positively advance the knowledge base.
本综述对18至24岁大学男生性侵害的患病率数据进行总结和评估。
通过检索电子文献数据库筛选潜在研究。如果研究（1）评估大学校园性侵害的患病率，（2）发表于学术期刊，（3）为英文，则初步选定纳入研究。采用该策略，初步识别出3973项研究，其中5项进行了全面审查。
所有5项研究均得出了大学校园男性性侵害的结果。然而，所确定的患病率数据差异很大，在接受调查的男性中为3.2%至28.7%。当将无行为能力作为一种侵害形式纳入研究时，总体而言，大学男生似乎最容易遭受这种形式的性暴力，尽管性少数群体男性可能有更多不同的受害经历。
性侵害的概念化以及试图评估患病率的项目措辞可能导致对真实患病率的低估。即使对患病率的了解不完整，结果表明此时继续评估患病率可能并非最紧迫的需求。对大学男生所面临的侵害类型以及这些领域内的教育、预防和干预进行研究，可能更有助于积极推进知识基础。
