• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FDA 报告称在 2018 年药物批准中使用了患者体验数据。

FDA Reported Use of Patient Experience Data in 2018 Drug Approvals.

机构信息

Global Regulatory Science and Policy - North America, Sanofi, 4520 East West Highway, Suite 210, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00106-1. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-019-00106-1
PMID:33301134
Abstract

BACKGROUND

"Patient experience data" (PED) refers to the systematic collection of meaningful data relating to the experiences, perspectives, needs, and priorities of patients. PED can augment traditional clinical trial data in the FDA's review of product applications. Section 3001 of the 2016 21st Century Cures Act requires the FDA to make a public statement about the PED considered in the approval of a drug application. Here, we present one of the first assessments of PED consideration during drug application approval, as reported by the FDA under Sec. 3001 of the Cures Act.

METHODS

FDA reported use of PED in the Review Documentation of the 59 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved in 2018 were collected, indexed, and cross-referenced against information regarding FDA review and product regulatory designation. The data reported in the PED tables were quantitatively described and visualized.

RESULTS

Of the 59 approved NMEs in 2018, 48 include a table that summarized whether PED was or was not used during the FDA drug review. Thirty-four of those 48 approvals (70.8%) reported using PED in the drug review. Patient-reported outcomes(PROs) represented the most significant source of PED and were used in 60.4% of approved drug reviews. Additional findings, including PED use by FDA review division and by FDA regulatory designation, are described.

CONCLUSIONS

This assessment is a first step to better understanding how FDA considers PED in regulatory decision making. This analysis should help develop a baseline regarding FDA use of PED and may inform decisions to ensure patients' experiences are adequately heard in future drug development.

摘要

背景

“患者体验数据”(PED)是指与患者的体验、观点、需求和优先事项相关的有意义数据的系统收集。PED 可以补充 FDA 审查产品申请时的传统临床试验数据。2016 年 21 世纪治愈法案第 3001 节要求 FDA 就药物申请批准中考虑的 PED 发表公开声明。在这里,我们根据 Cures 法案第 3001 节,展示了 FDA 在药物申请批准过程中首次评估 PED 考虑因素之一。

方法

收集了 2018 年批准的 59 种新分子实体(NME)的 FDA 审查文件中报告的 PED 使用情况,对其进行索引,并与 FDA 审查和产品监管指定的信息进行交叉引用。报告的 PED 表中的数据进行了定量描述和可视化。

结果

在 2018 年批准的 59 种 NME 中,有 48 种包含一个总结表,说明在 FDA 药物审查期间是否使用了 PED。在这 48 个批准中有 34 个(70.8%)报告在药物审查中使用了 PED。患者报告的结果(PROs)是 PED 的最重要来源,在 60.4%的批准药物审查中使用。还描述了其他发现,包括 FDA 审查部门和 FDA 监管指定使用 PED 的情况。

结论

这项评估是更好地了解 FDA 在监管决策中如何考虑 PED 的第一步。该分析应有助于了解 FDA 使用 PED 的基线情况,并可能为确保未来药物开发中充分听取患者意见的决策提供信息。

相似文献

1
FDA Reported Use of Patient Experience Data in 2018 Drug Approvals.FDA 报告称在 2018 年药物批准中使用了患者体验数据。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00106-1. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
FDA Reported Use of Patient Experience Data in 2018 Drug Approvals.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)报告了2018年药品审批中患者体验数据的使用情况。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Oct 9:2168479019871519. doi: 10.1177/2168479019871519.
3
New Drug and Biologics Approvals in 2019: A Systematic Analysis of Patient Experience Data in FDA Drug Approval Packages and Product Labels.2019年新药和生物制品批准情况:对美国食品药品监督管理局药品批准文件和产品标签中患者体验数据的系统分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 May;55(3):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00244-x. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
Current Practices and Challenges When Submitting Patient Experience Data for Regulatory Decisions by the US Food and Drug Administration: An Industry Survey.当美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在监管决策中提交患者体验数据时的现行做法和挑战:一项行业调查。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):147-159. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00653-8. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Scientific and regulatory reasons for delay and denial of FDA approval of initial applications for new drugs, 2000-2012.科学和监管原因导致新药首次申请延迟和被 FDA 否决,2000-2012 年。
JAMA. 2014;311(4):378-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282542.
6
Innovating by developing new uses of already-approved drugs: trends in the marketing approval of supplemental indications.通过开发已批准药物的新用途进行创新:补充适应症营销批准的趋势。
Clin Ther. 2013 Jun;35(6):808-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
FDA Approval and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals, 1983-2018.FDA 对药品的批准与监管,1983-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):164-176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20288.
8
The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局的历史与当代挑战
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.006.
9
Impact of Federal Regulatory Changes on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Development: the Common Rule and the 21st Century Cures Act.联邦监管政策变化对临床药理学和药物研发的影响:通用规则和 21 世纪治愈法案。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;58(3):281-285. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1026. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
10
Iodine-131 Tositumomab: (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, (131)I-tositumomab, anti-CD20 murine monoclonal antibody-I-131, B1, Bexxar, (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, iodine-131 tositumomab, iodine-131 anti-B1 antibody, tositumomab.碘-131托西莫单抗:(131)I-抗B1抗体、(131)I-托西莫单抗、抗CD20鼠单克隆抗体-I-131、B1、美罗华、(131)I-抗B1抗体、碘-131托西莫单抗、碘-131抗B1抗体、托西莫单抗
BioDrugs. 2003;17(4):290-5. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200317040-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of major depressive disorder-a meta-epidemiological review.重度抑郁症随机临床试验中患者报告结局报告的质量低下——一项元流行病学综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 7;14:1246938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1246938. eCollection 2023.
2
Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making.全球患者体验数据导航器的共同创建:一项多利益相关方倡议,以确保患者的声音在健康决策中得到体现。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9.
3
Life engagement in people living with schizophrenia: predictors and correlates of patient life engagement in a large sample of people living in the community.
精神分裂症患者的生活参与度:社区居住的大样本患者生活参与度的预测因素和相关因素。
Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7943-7952. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002106. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Exploring life engagement from the perspective of patients with major depressive disorder: a study using patient interviews.从重度抑郁症患者的角度探索生活参与度:一项采用患者访谈的研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Oct 12;6(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00517-z.
5
Building from Patient Experiences to Deliver Patient-Focused Healthcare Systems in Collaboration with Patients: A Call to Action.从患者体验出发,与患者合作构建以患者为中心的医疗保健系统:行动呼吁。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):848-858. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00432-x. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
People living with moderate-to-severe COPD prefer improvement of daily symptoms over the improvement of exacerbations: a multicountry patient preference study.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者更倾向于改善日常症状而非急性加重:一项多国患者偏好研究。
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Jun 13;8(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00686-2021. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures for life engagement in mental health: a systematic review.心理健康中生活参与度的患者报告结局指标:一项系统综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jun 10;6(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00468-5.
8
The value of direct patient reporting in pharmacovigilance.直接患者报告在药物警戒中的价值。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Oct 26;11:2042098620940164. doi: 10.1177/2042098620940164. eCollection 2020.
9
Can We Afford to Exclude Patients Throughout Health Technology Assessment?在整个卫生技术评估过程中,我们能承担得起将患者排除在外的后果吗?
Front Med Technol. 2022 Jan 25;3:796344. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.796344. eCollection 2021.