SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速检测与自采鼻拭子和专业采集鼻咽拭子的头对头比较。
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab.
机构信息
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Berlin, Germany.
Authors contributed equally.
出版信息
Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 15;57(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
Abstract
摘要
[链接]
相似文献
1
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab.SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速检测与自采鼻拭子和专业采集鼻咽拭子的头对头比较。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 15;57(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
2
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.自行采集的鼻腔拭子与专业采集的鼻咽拭子用于世界卫生组织清单上的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断检测的头对头性能比较。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in HHT patients: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal swab.遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症患者 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断检测：鼻咽拭子与口咽拭子比较。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Dec 18;15(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01628-w.
4
Comparison of the simultaneous conjunctiva and oropharynx-nasopharynx swab results in patients applying to the SARS-CoV-2 outpatient clinic for the first time.首次因疑似 2019 冠状病毒疾病至门诊求诊病患，同时以结膜及鼻咽拭子进行检测之比较。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4516-4522. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26981. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Testing Compared with Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集唾液检测与鼻咽拭子检测在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的表现比较。
Viruses. 2021 May 12;13(5):895. doi: 10.3390/v13050895.
6
Complications of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Safe Procedures for COVID-19 Testing Based on Anatomical Knowledge.基于解剖学知识的鼻咽拭子并发症和 COVID-19 检测安全程序。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Mar 21;37(11):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e88.
7
An alternative way to perform diagnostic nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection.进行 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断性鼻咽拭子检查的另一种方法。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102828. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102828. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
YouTube Videos Demonstrating the Nasopharyngeal Swab Technique for SARS-CoV-2 Specimen Collection: Content Analysis.YouTube 视频演示 SARS-CoV-2 标本采集鼻咽拭子技术：内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 14;7(1):e24220. doi: 10.2196/24220.
9
Combined Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Oropharyngeal Specimens versus Provider-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.联合自我采集的前鼻拭子和口咽拭子与医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02291-20.
10
Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR.四种快速抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的性能比较及与 RT-qPCR 的准确性对比。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104782. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of an internet of things device for isothermal molecular detection.用于等温分子检测的物联网设备评估
Infection. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02581-1.
2
Head-to-head comparison of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in a community drive-through test centre in the UK.在英国一个社区免下车检测中心对前鼻孔拭子和鼻咽拭子进行SARS-CoV-2抗原检测的直接比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Mar 22;12(1):e001747. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001747.
3
Comparison of a Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test with Real-Time PCR.一种新型冠状病毒2型快速抗原检测与实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应的比较
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024 Dec 19;6(4):298-305. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2024.421. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
5
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
6
Utilization of at-home tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Chicago.芝加哥医护人员对2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）居家检测的使用情况。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 24;4(1):e58. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.17. eCollection 2024.
7
Potential Application of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Infectious Individuals Attending Mass Gatherings - A Simulation Study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2快速抗原诊断检测在检测参加大型集会的感染个体中的潜在应用——一项模拟研究
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 25;2:862826. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.862826. eCollection 2022.
8
At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape.家庭呼吸道病毒检测：当前现状简述。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0031223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00312-23. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
9
Evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing in Lesotho and Zambia.评估 COVID-19 抗原快速诊断检测试剂盒在莱索托和赞比亚的自我检测效果。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0280105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280105. eCollection 2024.
10
Acceptability of self-administered antigen test for COVID-19 in the Philippines.菲律宾对自行进行的 COVID-19 抗原检测的可接受性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jan 17;40(1):e10. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000035.
本文引用的文献
1
International external quality assessment for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection and survey on clinical laboratory preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic, April/May 2020.2020 年 4 月/5 月，COVID-19 大流行期间针对 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的国际外部质量评估以及临床实验室准备情况调查。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jul;25(27). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.27.2001223.
2
Swabs Collected by Patients or Health Care Workers for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.患者或医护人员采集的用于新型冠状病毒检测的拭子。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):494-496. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016321. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒（2019-nCoV）
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.
Zotero 插件