Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;26(10):5864-5874. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00950-w. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
Mismatch between CSF and PET amyloid-β biomarkers occurs in up to ≈20% of preclinical/prodromal Alzheimer's disease individuals. Factors underlying mismatching results remain unclear. In this study we hypothesized that CSF/PET discordance provides unique biological/clinical information. To test this hypothesis, we investigated non-demented and demented participants with CSF amyloid-β and [18F]Florbetapir PET assessments at baseline (n = 867) and at 2-year follow-up (n = 289). Longitudinal trajectories of amyloid-β positivity were tracked simultaneously for CSF and PET biomarkers. In the longitudinal cohort (n = 289), we found that participants with normal CSF/PET amyloid-β biomarkers progressed more frequently toward CSF/PET discordance than to full CSF/PET positivity (χ = 5.40; p < 0.05). Progression to CSF+/PET+ status was ten times more frequent in cases with discordant biomarkers, as compared to csf-/pet- cases (χ = 18.86; p < 0.001). Compared to the CSF+/pet- group, the csf-/PET+ group had lower APOE-ε4ε4 prevalence (χ = 197; p < 0.001; n = 867) and slower rate of brain amyloid-β accumulation (F = 12.76; p < 0.001; n = 608). These results demonstrate that biomarker discordance is a typical stage in the natural history of amyloid-β accumulation, with CSF or PET becoming abnormal first and not concurrently. Therefore, biomarker discordance allows for identification of individuals with elevated risk of progression toward fully abnormal amyloid-β biomarkers, with subsequent risk of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Our results also suggest that there are two alternative pathways ("CSF-first" vs. "PET-first") toward established amyloid-β pathology, characterized by different genetic profiles and rates of amyloid-β accumulation. In conclusion, CSF and PET amyloid-β biomarkers provide distinct information, with potential implications for their use as biomarkers in clinical trials.
在多达约 20%的临床前/前驱期阿尔茨海默病个体中,CSF 和 PET 淀粉样蛋白-β生物标志物之间存在不匹配。导致不匹配结果的因素仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们假设 CSF/PET 不匹配提供了独特的生物学/临床信息。为了验证这一假设,我们在基线(n=867)和 2 年随访时(n=289)对无痴呆和痴呆患者进行了 CSF 淀粉样蛋白-β和[18F]Florbetapir PET 评估。同时追踪了 CSF 和 PET 生物标志物的淀粉样蛋白-β阳性的纵向轨迹。在纵向队列(n=289)中,我们发现与正常 CSF/PET 淀粉样蛋白-β生物标志物的参与者更频繁地向 CSF/PET 不匹配进展,而不是向完全 CSF/PET 阳性进展(χ=5.40;p<0.05)。与 CSF-/PET-病例相比,具有不匹配生物标志物的病例进展为 CSF+/PET+状态的频率高十倍(χ=18.86;p<0.001)。与 CSF+/PET-组相比,csf-/PET+组的 APOE-ε4ε4 患病率较低(χ=197;p<0.001;n=867),脑淀粉样蛋白-β积累速度较慢(F=12.76;p<0.001;n=608)。这些结果表明,生物标志物不匹配是淀粉样蛋白-β积累自然史中的一个典型阶段,CSF 或 PET 首先变得异常,而不是同时异常。因此,生物标志物不匹配可以识别出淀粉样蛋白-β生物标志物完全异常进展风险增加的个体,随后出现神经退行性变和认知能力下降的风险。我们的结果还表明,存在两种通向既定淀粉样蛋白-β病理学的替代途径(“CSF-优先”与“PET-优先”),其特征是不同的遗传特征和淀粉样蛋白-β积累速度。总之,CSF 和 PET 淀粉样蛋白-β生物标志物提供了不同的信息,这可能对它们在临床试验中的作为生物标志物的使用具有潜在影响。