Suppr超能文献

本地传粉者友好型植物和非本地传粉者友好型植物对本地野生蜜蜂群落的价值是否相同?

Are native and non-native pollinator friendly plants equally valuable for native wild bee communities?

作者信息

Seitz Nicola, vanEngelsdorp Dennis, Leonhardt Sara D

机构信息

Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.

Department of Entomology University of Maryland College Park MD USA.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 13;10(23):12838-12850. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6826. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Bees rely on floral pollen and nectar for food. Therefore, pollinator friendly plantings are often used to enrich habitats in bee conservation efforts. As part of these plantings, non-native plants may provide valuable floral resources, but their effects on native bee communities have not been assessed in direct comparison with native pollinator friendly plantings. In this study, we performed a common garden experiment by seeding mixes of 20 native and 20 non-native pollinator friendly plant species at separate neighboring plots at three sites in Maryland, USA, and recorded flower visitors for 2 years. A total of 3,744 bees (120 species) were collected. Bee abundance and species richness were either similar across plant types (midseason and for abundance also late season) or lower at native than at non-native plots (early season and for richness also late season). The overall bee community composition differed significantly between native and non-native plots, with 11 and 23 bee species being found exclusively at one plot type or the other, respectively. Additionally, some species were more abundant at native plant plots, while others were more abundant at non-natives. Native plants hosted more specialized plant-bee visitation networks than non-native plants. Three species out of the five most abundant bee species were more specialized when foraging on native plants than on non-native plants. Overall, visitation networks were more specialized in the early season than in late seasons. Our findings suggest that non-native plants can benefit native pollinators, but may alter foraging patterns, bee community assemblage, and bee-plant network structures.

摘要

蜜蜂依靠花粉和花蜜作为食物。因此,在蜜蜂保护工作中,通常会种植对传粉者友好的植物来丰富栖息地。作为这些种植活动的一部分,非本地植物可能会提供有价值的花卉资源,但与本地对传粉者友好的植物相比,它们对本地蜜蜂群落的影响尚未得到直接评估。在本研究中,我们在美国马里兰州的三个地点,在相邻的不同地块分别播种了20种本地和20种非本地对传粉者友好的植物种子,进行了一项共同花园实验,并记录了两年的访花者情况。共收集到3744只蜜蜂(120种)。蜜蜂的丰度和物种丰富度在不同植物类型间要么相似(中期,丰度在后期也相似),要么在本地地块低于非本地地块(早期,丰富度在后期也较低)。本地和非本地地块的蜜蜂群落总体组成存在显著差异,分别有11种和23种蜜蜂仅在一种地块类型中被发现。此外,一些物种在本地植物地块更为丰富,而另一些则在非本地植物地块更为丰富。本地植物比非本地植物拥有更多专门的植物 - 蜜蜂访花网络。在五种最丰富的蜜蜂物种中,有三种在取食本地植物时比取食非本地植物时更为专门化。总体而言,访花网络在早期比后期更为专门化。我们的研究结果表明,非本地植物可以使本地传粉者受益,但可能会改变觅食模式、蜜蜂群落组成以及蜜蜂 - 植物网络结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b3/7713930/2fe235d0629b/ECE3-10-12838-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验