Suppr超能文献

癌症相关内脏静脉血栓形成的临床病史。

Clinical history of cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis.

作者信息

Valeriani Emanuele, Di Nisio Marcello, Riva Nicoletta, Caiano Lucia Maria, Porreca Ettore, Bang Soo-Mee, Beyer-Westendorf Jan, Sartori Maria Teresa, Barillari Giovanni, Santoro Rita, Kamphuisen Pieter W, Alatri Adriano, Malato Alessandra, Vidili Gianpaolo, Oh Doyeun, Schulman Sam, Ageno Walter

机构信息

Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.

Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine, Campus-Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Apr;19(4):983-991. doi: 10.1111/jth.15214. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer represents a risk factor for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) and usual site venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVES

To compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer-associated SVT and usual site VTE.

PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients with solid cancer and SVT were enrolled in an international, prospective registry between May 2008 and January 2012. The comparison cohort included (1:1 ratio) patients with solid cancer and usual site VTE treated at two thrombosis centers who had a minimum of 12 months follow-up at December 2019 or experienced one of the outcomes within 12 months follow-up. Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were evaluated at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients (132 in each cohort) were enrolled. Patients with SVT were less likely to have metastatic disease (36.1% vs 72.5%) or receive cancer therapy at thrombosis diagnosis (29.6% vs 64.9%). The most frequent cancer types were hepatobiliary and pancreatic in the SVT cohort and gastrointestinal in the usual site VTE cohort. Fewer patients with SVT received anticoagulation (68.9% vs 99.2%), and treatment duration was shorter (6.0 vs 11.0 months). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding (2.3% vs 4.7%) was nonsignificantly lower in the SVT cohort, whereas recurrent thrombosis (4.7% vs 5.5%) and all-cause mortality (41.7% vs 39.4%) were comparable between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding appears to be similar in cancer patients with SVT and cancer patients with usual site VTE, despite some differences in baseline characteristics and anticoagulant treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

癌症是内脏静脉血栓形成(SVT)和常见部位静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的危险因素。

目的

比较癌症相关SVT患者和常见部位VTE患者的特征及预后。

患者/方法:2008年5月至2012年1月期间,实体癌合并SVT患者被纳入一项国际前瞻性登记研究。比较队列包括(1:1比例)在两个血栓形成中心接受治疗的实体癌合并常见部位VTE患者,这些患者在2019年12月至少有12个月的随访,或在12个月随访内经历了其中一项结局。在12个月随访时评估复发性VTE、大出血和全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入264例患者(每组132例)。SVT患者发生转移性疾病的可能性较小(36.1%对72.5%),或在血栓形成诊断时接受癌症治疗的可能性较小(29.6%对64.9%)。SVT队列中最常见的癌症类型是肝胆和胰腺,常见部位VTE队列中是胃肠道。接受抗凝治疗的SVT患者较少(68.9%对99.2%),治疗持续时间较短(6.0对11.0个月)。SVT队列中大出血的累积发生率略低(2.3%对4.7%),但差异无统计学意义,而两组队列中复发性血栓形成(4.7%对5.5%)和全因死亡率(41.7%对39.4%)相当。

结论

尽管基线特征和抗凝治疗存在一些差异,但癌症合并SVT患者和癌症合并常见部位VTE患者的复发性血栓形成和出血风险似乎相似。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验