Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Feb;376(1817):20190694. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0694. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Humans spend a considerable portion of their lives engaged in 'stimulus-independent thoughts' (SIT), or mental activity that occurs independently of input from the immediate external environment. Although such SITs are, by definition, different from thoughts that are driven by stimuli in one's external environment (i.e. stimulus-dependent thoughts; SDTs), at times, the phenomenology of these two types of thought appears to be deceptively similar. But how similar are they? We address this question by comparing the content of two types of SIT (dreaming and waking SITs) with the content of SDTs. In this 7 day, smartphone-based experience-sampling procedure, participants were intermittently probed during the day and night to indicate whether their current thoughts were stimulus dependent or stimulus independent. They then responded to content-based items indexing the qualitative aspects of their experience (e.g. My thoughts were jumping from topic to topic). Results indicate substantial distinctiveness between these three types of thought: significant differences between at least two of the three mental states were found across every measured variable. Implications are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.
人类一生中相当一部分时间都在进行“非刺激依赖性思维”(SIT),即独立于即时外部环境输入的心理活动。尽管这种 SIT 从定义上讲与受外部环境刺激驱动的思维(即刺激依赖性思维;SDT)不同,但有时这两种类型的思维的现象学似乎令人误解地相似。但它们有多相似呢?我们通过将两种类型的 SIT(梦境和清醒时的 SIT)的内容与 SDT 的内容进行比较来回答这个问题。在这项为期 7 天的基于智能手机的体验抽样程序中,参与者在白天和晚上被间歇性地询问,以表明他们当前的思维是刺激依赖性的还是刺激独立性的。然后,他们对反映体验定性方面的内容项目做出回应(例如,我的思维从一个话题跳到另一个话题)。结果表明这三种思维类型之间存在实质性的区别:在每个测量变量中,至少两种心理状态之间存在显著差异。讨论了其含义。本文是主题为“离线感知:没有匹配外部刺激的自愿和自发的感知体验”的一部分。