Suppr超能文献

使用经验抽样比较刺激独立思维、刺激依赖思维和梦境的现象学特征。

Comparing the phenomenological qualities of stimulus-independent thought, stimulus-dependent thought and dreams using experience sampling.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Feb;376(1817):20190694. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0694. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Abstract

Humans spend a considerable portion of their lives engaged in 'stimulus-independent thoughts' (SIT), or mental activity that occurs independently of input from the immediate external environment. Although such SITs are, by definition, different from thoughts that are driven by stimuli in one's external environment (i.e. stimulus-dependent thoughts; SDTs), at times, the phenomenology of these two types of thought appears to be deceptively similar. But how similar are they? We address this question by comparing the content of two types of SIT (dreaming and waking SITs) with the content of SDTs. In this 7 day, smartphone-based experience-sampling procedure, participants were intermittently probed during the day and night to indicate whether their current thoughts were stimulus dependent or stimulus independent. They then responded to content-based items indexing the qualitative aspects of their experience (e.g. My thoughts were jumping from topic to topic). Results indicate substantial distinctiveness between these three types of thought: significant differences between at least two of the three mental states were found across every measured variable. Implications are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

摘要

人类一生中相当一部分时间都在进行“非刺激依赖性思维”(SIT),即独立于即时外部环境输入的心理活动。尽管这种 SIT 从定义上讲与受外部环境刺激驱动的思维(即刺激依赖性思维;SDT)不同,但有时这两种类型的思维的现象学似乎令人误解地相似。但它们有多相似呢?我们通过将两种类型的 SIT(梦境和清醒时的 SIT)的内容与 SDT 的内容进行比较来回答这个问题。在这项为期 7 天的基于智能手机的体验抽样程序中,参与者在白天和晚上被间歇性地询问,以表明他们当前的思维是刺激依赖性的还是刺激独立性的。然后,他们对反映体验定性方面的内容项目做出回应(例如,我的思维从一个话题跳到另一个话题)。结果表明这三种思维类型之间存在实质性的区别:在每个测量变量中,至少两种心理状态之间存在显著差异。讨论了其含义。本文是主题为“离线感知:没有匹配外部刺激的自愿和自发的感知体验”的一部分。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Mind wandering enhances statistical learning.思绪漫游能增强统计学习能力。
iScience. 2025 Jan 4;28(2):111703. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111703. eCollection 2025 Feb 21.
6
Affect Across the Wake-Sleep Cycle.整个觉醒-睡眠周期中的情感影响。
Affect Sci. 2023 Aug 2;4(3):563-569. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00204-2. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Dreaming of the sleep lab.梦见睡眠实验室。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 6;16(10):e0257738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257738. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验