Albrecht Sophie Charlotte, Leineweber Constanze, Ojajärvi Anneli, Oksanen Tuula, Kecklund Goran, Härmä Mikko
Stress Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12181. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12181.
Work-time control is associated with lower sickness absence rates, but it remains unclear whether this association differs by type of diagnosis and sub-dimension of work-time control (control over daily hours and control over time off) and whether certain vulnerable groups benefit more from higher levels of work-time control.
Survey data from the Finnish 10-town study in 2004 were used to examine if baseline levels of work-time control were associated with register data on diagnose-specific sickness absence for 7 consecutive years (n = 22 599). Cox proportional hazard models were conducted, adjusted for age, sex, education, occupational status, shift work including nights, and physical/mental workload.
During follow-up, 2,818 individuals were on sick leave (≥10 days) due to musculoskeletal disorders and 1724 due to mental disorders. Employees with high (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87; HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.82, respectively) and moderate (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90; HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91, respectively) levels of control over daily hours/control over time off had a decreased risk of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Sub-group analyses revealed that especially workers who were older benefitted the most from higher levels of work-time control. Neither sub-dimension of work-time control was related to sickness absence due to mental disorders.
Over a 7-year period of follow-up, high and moderate levels of work-time control were related to lower rates of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders, but not due to mental disorders.
工作时间控制与较低的病假缺勤率相关,但尚不清楚这种关联是否因诊断类型和工作时间控制的子维度(对每日工作时长的控制和对休假时间的控制)而异,以及某些弱势群体是否能从更高水平的工作时间控制中获益更多。
使用2004年芬兰十城镇研究的调查数据,以检验工作时间控制的基线水平是否与连续7年的特定诊断病假缺勤登记数据相关(n = 22599)。进行了Cox比例风险模型分析,并对年龄、性别、教育程度、职业状况、包括夜班在内的轮班工作以及身体/精神工作量进行了调整。
在随访期间,2818人因肌肉骨骼疾病休病假(≥10天),1724人因精神疾病休病假。对每日工作时长/休假时间控制水平高(HR = 0.80,95%CI 0.74 - 0.87;HR = 0.76,95%CI 0.70 - 0.82)和中等(HR = 0.83,95%CI 0.77 - 0.90;HR = 0.85,95%CI 0.79 - 0.91)的员工因肌肉骨骼疾病而病假缺勤的风险降低。亚组分析显示,尤其是年龄较大的工人从更高水平的工作时间控制中获益最大。工作时间控制的两个子维度均与因精神疾病导致的病假缺勤无关。
在7年的随访期内,高水平和中等水平的工作时间控制与因肌肉骨骼疾病导致的较低病假缺勤率相关,但与因精神疾病导致的病假缺勤率无关。