Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;77(4):1090-1105. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23099. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
The current study examined the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessing ICD-11 personality psychopathology trait domain qualifiers.
Using a community sample (N = 217) weighted for externalizing dysfunction, this study evaluated the convergence between ICD-11 trait domains as measured by the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with hypothesized MMPI-2-RF scales. Particular emphasis was placed on evaluating the convergence between the ICD-11 trait domain qualifiers and the MMPI-2-RF personality psychopathology-5 (PSY-5) scales, as the latter are meant to represent broadband domains of personality pathology.
Correlation and regression analyses demonstrated expected associations between ICD-11 domains and conceptually expected MMPI-2-RF scales, with some minor exceptions. Notably, the Anankastia domain showed associations with scales assessing negative affect, but did not show expected negative associations with scales related to disinhibition.
The findings generally supported the use of the MMPI-2-RF in assessing individual expressions of personality dysfunction from the ICD-11 trait domain qualifier perspective.
本研究考察了明尼苏达多相人格测验-2 修订版（MMPI-2-RF）在评估 ICD-11 人格病理学特质领域限定因素方面的效用。
本研究使用一个加权考虑外显功能障碍的社区样本（N=217），评估了由 DSM-5 人格量表（PID-5）测量的 ICD-11 特质领域与假设的 MMPI-2-RF 量表之间的收敛性。特别强调评估 ICD-11 特质领域限定因素与 MMPI-2-RF 人格病理学-5（PSY-5）量表之间的收敛性，因为后者旨在代表人格病理学的广泛领域。
相关和回归分析显示了 ICD-11 领域与概念上预期的 MMPI-2-RF 量表之间的预期关联，只有一些微小的例外。值得注意的是，强迫型人格障碍领域与评估负性情绪的量表相关联，但与与抑制无关的量表没有表现出预期的负相关。
这些发现总体上支持了使用 MMPI-2-RF 从 ICD-11 特质领域限定因素的角度评估个体人格功能障碍的表达。
