• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布拉德福德更佳开端(BiBBS)干预性出生队列研究:中期队列概况。

Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile.

作者信息

Dickerson Josie, Bridges Sally, Willan Kathryn, Kelly Brian, Moss Rachael H, Lister Jennie, Netkitsing Chandani, Atkinson Amy L, Bird Philippa K, Uphoff Eleanora P, Mason Dan, Newsham Alex, Waiblinger Dagmar, Razaq Rifat, Ahern Sara, Bryant Maria, Blower Sarah L, Pickett Kate E, McEachan Rosemary M, Wright John

机构信息

Born in Bradford, Bradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:244. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2
PMID:37830108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565418/
Abstract

The Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study was designed as an innovative cohort platform for efficient evaluation of early life interventions delivered through the Better Start Bradford programme. There are a growing number of interventional cohorts being implemented internationally. This paper provides an interim analysis of BiBBS in order to share learning about the feasibility and value of this method. Recruitment began in January 2016 and will complete in December 2023 with a target sample of 5,000 pregnancies. An interim analysis was completed for all pregnancies recruited between January 2016 and November 2019 with an expected due date between 1 April 2016 and 8 March 2020. Descriptive statistics were completed on the data. Of 4,823 eligible pregnancies, 2,626 (54%) pregnancies were recruited, resulting in 2,392 mothers and 2,501 children. The sample are representative of the pregnant population (61% Pakistani heritage; 12% White British; 8% other South Asian and 6% Central and Eastern European ethnicity). The majority of participants (84%) live in the lowest decile of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, and many live in vulnerable circumstances. A high proportion (85%) of BiBBS families have engaged in one or more of the Better Start Bradford interventions. Levels of participation varied by the characteristics of the interventions, such as the requirement for active participation and the length of commitment to a programme. We have demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting an interventional cohort that includes seldom heard families from ethnic minority and deprived backgrounds. The high level of uptake of interventions is encouraging for the goal of evaluating the process and outcomes of multiple early life interventions using the innovative interventional cohort approach. BiBBS covers a period before, during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic which adds scientific value to the cohort.

摘要

布拉德福德出生即更好开端(BiBBS)干预性出生队列研究被设计为一个创新的队列平台,用于高效评估通过布拉德福德更好开端计划实施的早期生活干预措施。国际上正在实施的干预性队列越来越多。本文对BiBBS进行中期分析,以便分享有关该方法的可行性和价值的经验。招募工作于2016年1月开始,将于2023年12月完成,目标样本为5000例妊娠。对2016年1月至2019年11月招募的所有预期预产期在2016年4月1日至2020年3月8日之间的妊娠进行了中期分析。对数据进行了描述性统计。在4823例符合条件的妊娠中,招募了2626例(54%)妊娠,产生了2392名母亲和2501名儿童。该样本代表了孕妇群体(61%为巴基斯坦裔;12%为英国白人;8%为其他南亚裔,6%为中欧和东欧裔)。大多数参与者(84%)生活在多重剥夺指数的最低十分位数,许多人生活在脆弱环境中。BiBBS家庭中有很大比例(85%)参与了一项或多项布拉德福德更好开端干预措施。参与程度因干预措施的特点而异,例如积极参与的要求和对一项计划的参与时长。我们已经证明了招募一个干预性队列的可行性,该队列包括来自少数族裔和贫困背景、鲜为人知的家庭。干预措施的高接受度对于使用创新的干预性队列方法评估多种早期生活干预措施的过程和结果的目标来说是令人鼓舞的。BiBBS涵盖了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前、期间和之后的一段时间,这为该队列增加了科学价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/b332e90fe186/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/9ae89225798c/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/071a9c52779b/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/b332e90fe186/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/9ae89225798c/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/071a9c52779b/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1e/10565560/b332e90fe186/wellcomeopenres-7-22243-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile.布拉德福德更佳开端(BiBBS)干预性出生队列研究:中期队列概况。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:244. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Born in Bradford's Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions.布拉德福德的“美好开端”项目:一项评估早期生活干预措施影响的实验性出生队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 4;15(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0.
3
Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.在队列研究中嵌套一项试验(TwiCS)以评估早期育儿计划是否可行?布拉德福德出生队列的更好开端研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9.
4
Changes in prevalence and patterns of consanguinity in Bradford, UK  - evidence from two cohort studies.英国布拉德福德近亲结婚率及模式的变化——两项队列研究的证据
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 28;9:222. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21121.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Protocol for the effectiveness evaluation of an antenatal, universally offered, and remotely delivered parenting programme 'Baby Steps' on maternal outcomes: a Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) study.《“婴儿起步”产前、普遍提供和远程育儿计划对产妇结局的有效性评估方案:布拉德福德出生的更好开端(BiBBS)研究》。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The feasibility of an objective measure of the parent-child relationship in health visiting practice: assessment of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.在健康访视实践中对亲子关系进行客观测量的可行性:母婴产后依恋量表的评估
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Nov 7;7:88. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17552.2. eCollection 2022.
8
Experiences of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic: descriptive findings from a survey of families in the Born in Bradford study.新冠疫情期间的封锁经历:来自布拉德福德出生队列研究中家庭调查的描述性结果
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 26;5:228. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16317.2. eCollection 2020.
9
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
10
A quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation of the 'Incredible Years Toddler' parenting programme on children's development aged 5: A study protocol.“难以置信的岁月”幼儿养育计划对 5 岁儿童发展的准实验有效性评估:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291557. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing patterns in marriage choice and related health risk in the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford UK: a qualitative study.英国布拉德福德巴基斯坦裔社区婚姻选择模式的变化及相关健康风险:一项定性研究
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Jun 9;9:690. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23338.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Mother and Infant Research Electronic Data Analysis (MIREDA): A protocol for creating a common data model for federated analysis of UK birth cohorts and the life course.母婴研究电子数据分析(MIREDA):为英国出生队列和生命历程的联合分析创建通用数据模型的方案。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Sep 12;9(2):2406. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2406. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (MPAS) in universal services: Qualitative interviews with health visitors.在通用服务中实施产妇产后依恋量表(MPAS):对健康访视员的定性访谈
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jan 6;7:85. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17551.2. eCollection 2022.
2
The feasibility of an objective measure of the parent-child relationship in health visiting practice: assessment of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.在健康访视实践中对亲子关系进行客观测量的可行性:母婴产后依恋量表的评估
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Nov 7;7:88. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17552.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Changes in prevalence and patterns of consanguinity in Bradford, UK  - evidence from two cohort studies.
英国布拉德福德近亲结婚率及模式的变化——两项队列研究的证据
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 28;9:222. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21121.2. eCollection 2024.
4
Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.在队列研究中嵌套一项试验(TwiCS)以评估早期育儿计划是否可行?布拉德福德出生队列的更好开端研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9.
5
A quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation of the 'Incredible Years Toddler' parenting programme on children's development aged 5: A study protocol.“难以置信的岁月”幼儿养育计划对 5 岁儿童发展的准实验有效性评估:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291557. eCollection 2023.
6
Examining individual social status using the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status: Findings from the Born in Bradford study.使用麦克阿瑟主观社会地位量表审视个体社会地位:来自布拉德福德出生队列研究的结果
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 3;23:101463. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101463. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Risk factors for early language delay in children within a minority ethnic, bilingual, deprived environment (Born in Bradford's Better Start): a UK community birth cohort study.少数民族、双语、贫困环境下儿童早期语言发育迟缓的风险因素(出生在布拉德福德的更好开端):英国社区出生队列研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001764.
8
Protocol for the effectiveness evaluation of an antenatal, universally offered, and remotely delivered parenting programme 'Baby Steps' on maternal outcomes: a Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) study.《“婴儿起步”产前、普遍提供和远程育儿计划对产妇结局的有效性评估方案:布拉德福德出生的更好开端(BiBBS)研究》。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1.
The Measurement Properties and Acceptability of a New Parent-Infant Bonding Tool ('Me and My Baby') for Use in United Kingdom Universal Healthcare Settings: A Psychometric, Cross-Sectional Study.
一种用于英国全民医疗保健环境的新型母婴联结工具(“我和我的宝宝”)的测量属性与可接受性:一项心理测量学横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 14;13:804885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804885. eCollection 2022.
4
Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): performance in a clinical sample in relation to PHQ-9 and GAD-7.短式 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(SWEMWBS):与 PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 相关的临床样本中的表现。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 24;19(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01882-x.
5
Experiences of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic: descriptive findings from a survey of families in the Born in Bradford study.新冠疫情期间的封锁经历:来自布拉德福德出生队列研究中家庭调查的描述性结果
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 26;5:228. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16317.2. eCollection 2020.
6
Population Health Science: Fulfilling the Mission of Public Health.人群健康科学:履行公共卫生使命。
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):9-23. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12493. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
The Born in Bradford COVID-19 Research Study: Protocol for an adaptive mixed methods research study to gather actionable intelligence on the impact of COVID-19 on health inequalities amongst families living in Bradford.布拉德福德出生队列新冠病毒研究:一项适应性混合方法研究的方案,旨在收集关于新冠病毒对居住在布拉德福德的家庭中健康不平等影响的可操作情报。
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Aug 13;5:191. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16129.1. eCollection 2020.
8
Integrating trials into a whole-population cohort of children and parents: statement of intent (trials) for the Generation Victoria (GenV) cohort.将试验纳入儿童及其父母的全人群队列:维多利亚一代(GenV)队列的意向声明(试验)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Sep 24;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01111-x.
9
Introducing the ORIGINS project: a community-based interventional birth cohort.介绍 ORIGINS 项目:一个基于社区的干预性出生队列研究。
Rev Environ Health. 2020 Sep 25;35(3):281-293. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2020-0057.
10
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.