Modric Toni, Versic Sime, Sekulic Damir
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
HNK Hajduk, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Sports (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;8(12):161. doi: 10.3390/sports8120161.
Running performances (RPs) are known to be important parameters of success in football (soccer), but there is a lack of studies where RPs are contextualized regarding applied tactical solutions. This study aims to quantify and analyze the differences in position-specific RPs in professional football, when games are played with three defensive players (3DP) and four defensive players (4DP). The participants here include professional football players (M ± SD, age 23.57 ± 2.84 years, body height 181.9 ± 5.17 cm, body mass 78.36 ± 4.18 kg) playing at the highest competitive level in Croatia. RPs were measured by global positioning system and classified into four groups based on playing positions: central defenders (CD; n = 47), wide defenders (WD; n = 24), midfielders (MF; n = 48), or forwards (FW; n = 19). Analysis of variance and discriminant canonical analysis are used to identify differences between 3DP and 4DP tactical solutions in terms of the RPs for each playing position. The number of accelerations and decelerations most significantly contributed to the differentiation of 3DP and 4DP among MFs (Wilks λ = 0.31, < 0.001), with higher occurrences with 3DP. For CDs, total distance, and high-intensity running were higher in 3DP (Wilks λ = 0.66, < 0.001). No multivariate differences were found for FW and WD players in terms of the RPs between 3DP and 4DP tactical formations. The characteristics and differences shown in this study may provide useful information for coaching staff regarding changing in-season tactical formations. Additionally, the results are useful for optimizing training programs for football players with different playing positions. When changing from 4DP to 3DP tactical formations, WDs training programs should include more of high-intensity running, while MFs training programs should be more based on short intensity activities (accelerations and decelerations).
跑步表现(RPs)是足球比赛成功的重要参数,但缺乏将跑步表现与应用战术解决方案相结合的研究。本研究旨在量化和分析职业足球中,当比赛采用三名防守球员(3DP)和四名防守球员(4DP)时,特定位置的跑步表现差异。参与者包括在克罗地亚最高竞技水平比赛的职业足球运动员(M±SD,年龄23.57±2.84岁,身高181.9±5.17厘米,体重78.36±4.18千克)。跑步表现通过全球定位系统测量,并根据比赛位置分为四组:中后卫(CD;n = 47)、边后卫(WD;n = 24)、中场球员(MF;n = 48)或前锋(FW;n = 19)。方差分析和判别典型分析用于确定在每个比赛位置的跑步表现方面,3DP和4DP战术解决方案之间的差异。加速和减速次数对中场球员中3DP和4DP的区分贡献最为显著(威尔克斯λ = 0.31,<0.001),3DP的出现次数更多。对于中后卫,3DP的总距离和高强度跑步更高(威尔克斯λ = 0.66,<0.001)。在3DP和4DP战术阵型之间,前锋和边后卫球员的跑步表现在多变量方面没有差异。本研究中显示的特征和差异可能为教练组提供有关赛季中战术阵型变化的有用信息。此外,这些结果对于优化不同比赛位置的足球运动员的训练计划很有用。当从4DP战术阵型改为3DP战术阵型时,边后卫的训练计划应包括更多的高强度跑步,而中场球员的训练计划应更多地基于短强度活动(加速和减速)。