Suppr超能文献

足球比赛中球的形成、比赛进行状态和控球对精英球员峰值需求的影响。

Effect of formation, ball in play and ball possession on peak demands in elite soccer.

作者信息

Riboli Andrea, Semeria Marco, Coratella Giuseppe, Esposito Fabio

机构信息

Atalanta B.C., Performance Department, Bergamo, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Biol Sport. 2021 Jun;38(2):195-205. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.98450. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Abstract

This study examined the most demanding passages of match play (MDP) and the effects of playing formation, ball-in-play (BiP) time and ball possession on the 1-min peak (1-min) demand in elite soccer. During 18 official matches, 305 individual samples from 223 Italian Serie A soccer players were collected. MDP and 1-min were calculated across playing position (central defenders, wide defenders, central midfielders, wide midfielders, wide forwards and forwards). Maximum relative (m·min) total distance (TD), high-speed running (HSR), very high-speed running (VHSR), sprint (SPR), acceleration/deceleration (Acc/Dec), estimated metabolic power (P) and high-metabolic load (HML) distance were calculated across different durations (1-5, 10, 90 min) using a rolling method. Additionally, 1-min demand was compared across playing formation (3-4-1-2, 3-4-2-1, 3-5-2, 4-3-3, 4-4-2), BiP and ball/no-ball possession cycles. MDP showed large to verylarge [effect-size (ES): 1.20/4.06] differences between 1-min vs all durations for each parameter. In 1-min, central midfielders and wide midfielders achieved greater TD and HSR (ES:0.43/1.13) while wide midfielders and wide forwards showed greater SPR and Acc/Dec (ES:0.30/1.15) than other positions. For VHSR, SPR and Acc/Dec 1-min showed fourfold higher locomotor requirements than 90-min. 1-min for Acc/Dec was highest in 4-3-3 for forwards, central and wide midfielders. 1-min was lower during peak BiP (BiP) for HSR, VHSR and Acc/Dec (ES: -2.57/-1.42). Comparing with vs without ball possession, BiP was greater (ES: 0.06/1.48) in forwards and wide forwards and lower (ES: -2.12/-0.07) in central defenders and wide defenders. Positional differences in MDP, 1-min and BiP were observed. Soccer-specific drills should account for positional differences when conditioning players for the peak demands. This may help practitioners to bridge the training/match gap.

摘要

本研究调查了精英足球比赛中最具挑战性的对抗阶段(MDP),以及比赛阵型、比赛中球的状态(BiP)和控球情况对1分钟峰值(1分钟)需求的影响。在18场正式比赛中,收集了来自223名意大利甲级联赛足球运动员的305个个体样本。计算了不同场上位置(中后卫、边后卫、中场球员、边锋、边前卫和前锋)的MDP和1分钟需求。使用滚动方法计算了不同时间段(1 - 5分钟、10分钟、90分钟)内的最大相对(米·分钟)总距离(TD)、高速奔跑(HSR)、极高速奔跑(VHSR)、冲刺(SPR)、加速/减速(Acc/Dec)、估计代谢功率(P)和高代谢负荷(HML)距离。此外,还比较了不同比赛阵型(3 - 4 - 1 - 2、3 - 4 - 2 - 1、3 - 5 - 2、4 - 3 - 3、4 - 4 - 2)、BiP以及控球/无球周期下的1分钟需求。每个参数在1分钟与所有其他时间段之间,MDP显示出大到非常大的效应量差异(ES:1.20 / 4.06)。在1分钟内,中场球员和边前卫的TD和HSR更高(ES:0.43 / 1.13),而边前卫和边锋的SPR和Acc/Dec比其他位置更大(ES:0.30 / 1.15)。对于VHSR、SPR和Acc/Dec,1分钟的运动需求比90分钟高四倍。前锋、中场球员和边前卫在4 - 3 - 比赛阵型中的1分钟Acc/Dec最高。在BiP高峰期,HSR、VHSR和Acc/Dec的1分钟需求较低(ES: - 2.57 / - 1.42)。与有球和无球情况相比,前锋和边锋的BiP更大(ES:0.06 / 1.48),而中后卫和边后卫的BiP较小(ES: - 2.12 / - 0.07)。观察到MDP、1分钟需求和BiP的位置差异。在为球员进行峰值需求的体能训练时,特定于足球的训练应考虑到位置差异。这可能有助于从业者缩小训练/比赛之间的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd1/8139352/78c52d506189/JBS-38-98450-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验