Protein Research Center, Shahid Behesti University, Tehran, Iran.
Advanced Materials and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, TardigradeNano, Irvine, CA, USA.
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022 Jul;40(10):4662-4681. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1860829. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Here, we report on a computational comparison of the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) on the spike proteins of severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and SARS-CoV in free forms and as complexes with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as their receptor in humans. The impact of 42 mutations discovered so far on the structure and thermodynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RBD was also assessed. The binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 RBD for ACE2 is higher than that of SARS-CoV RBD. The binding of COVA2-04 antibody to SARS-CoV-2 RBD is more energetically favorable than the binding of COVA2-39, but also less favorable than the formation of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 complex. The net charge, the dipole moment and hydrophilicity of SARS-CoV-2 RBD are higher than those of SARS-CoV RBD, producing lower solvation and surface free energies and thus lower stability. The structure of SARS-CoV-2 RBD is also more flexible and more open, with a larger solvent-accessible surface area than that of SARS-CoV RBD. Single-point mutations have a dramatic effect on distribution of charges, most prominently at the site of substitution and its immediate vicinity. These charge alterations alter the free energy landscape, while X→F mutations exhibit a stabilizing effect on the RBD structure through π stacking. F456 and W436 emerge as two key residues governing the stability and affinity of the spike protein for its ACE2 receptor. These analyses of the structural differences and the impact of mutations on different viral strains and members of the coronavirus genera are an essential aid in the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
在这里,我们报告了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)和 SARS-CoV 的刺突蛋白的受体结合域(RBD)在自由形式以及与作为其人类受体的血管紧张素转换酶 2(ACE2)复合物中的计算比较。还评估了迄今为止发现的 42 种突变对 SARS-CoV-2 RBD 结构和热力学的影响。SARS-CoV-2 RBD 与 ACE2 的结合亲和力高于 SARS-CoV RBD。与 COVA2-39 相比,COVA2-04 抗体与 SARS-CoV-2 RBD 的结合在能量上更有利,但也不如 SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 复合物的形成有利。SARS-CoV-2 RBD 的净电荷、偶极矩和亲水性高于 SARS-CoV RBD,产生较低的溶剂化和表面自由能,从而降低稳定性。SARS-CoV-2 RBD 的结构也更灵活、更开放,溶剂可及表面积大于 SARS-CoV RBD。单点突变对电荷分布有显著影响,最明显的是取代部位及其附近。这些电荷变化改变了自由能景观,而 X→F 突变通过π堆积对 RBD 结构产生稳定作用。F456 和 W436 成为控制刺突蛋白与其 ACE2 受体稳定性和亲和力的两个关键残基。对不同病毒株和冠状病毒属成员的结构差异和突变影响的这些分析是制定有效治疗策略的重要辅助手段。由 Ramaswamy H. Sarma 传达。