Suppr超能文献

《前额叶症状量表在巴西老年人群中的有效性证据》。

Validity Evidences of the Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory for the Elderly Brazilian Population.

机构信息

Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ciencias da Saude, Campus Universitario Natal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN, BR.

Departamento de Psicologia, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saude (FPS), Recife, PE, BR.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Dec 9;75:e1863. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1863. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to translate the Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory (PSI) (abbreviated version) for the elderly into Brazilian Portuguese, evaluate its psychometric properties, and investigate if the PSI could distinguish between groups with (clinical group) and without (non-clinical group) a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

The PSI was idiomatically and culturally adapted, and then administered to 256 individuals over 60 years of age who also completed a clinical interview, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-15, and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB).

RESULTS

The results indicated satisfactory adjustment and adequate reliability (Ω of 0.83 and α=0.80) for the uni-factorial model. The non-clinical group showed significant correlations between the PSI-16, GDS-15, MMSE, and FAB and its six subtests. In the clinical group, there were negative correlations between the PSI-16, MMSE, and the FAB and the conceptual subtest. The groups differed statistically significantly, with the clinical sample showing the highest PSI-16 score. In the non-clinical group, there were significant positive correlations between age and PSI-16, and negative correlations between education and PSI-16.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the PSI-16 can be used as a valid and reliable screening tool for clinical use in the elderly with and without pathology.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将 Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory(PSI)(缩写版)翻译为巴西葡萄牙语,并评估其心理测量学特性,同时考察 PSI 是否能够区分有(临床组)和无(非临床组)可能的阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断的人群。

方法

对 PSI 进行了成语和文化适应性调整,然后对 256 名 60 岁以上的个体进行了测试,这些个体还完成了临床访谈、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)和额叶评估量表(FAB)。

结果

结果表明,单因素模型的调整和可靠性均令人满意(Ω为 0.83,α=0.80)。非临床组中 PSI-16、GDS-15、MMSE 和 FAB 及其六个子测试之间存在显著相关性。在临床组中,PSI-16、MMSE 和 FAB 与概念性子测试之间呈负相关。两组在统计学上存在显著差异,临床组的 PSI-16 评分最高。在非临床组中,年龄与 PSI-16 之间呈显著正相关,而教育与 PSI-16 之间呈负相关。

结论

本研究结果表明,PSI-16 可作为一种有效的、可靠的筛查工具,用于临床和非临床老年人。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验