• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥的团体产前保健:卫生人员的观点和经验。

Group Prenatal Care in Mexico: perspectives and experiences of health personnel.

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.

University of California San Francisco. San Francisco General Hospital. Department of ObGyn & Reproductive Sciences. San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 14;54:140. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002175. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002175
PMID:33331532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7703532/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify barriers and facilitators to implementing the Group Prenatal Care model in Mexico (GPC) from the health care personnel's perspective.

METHODS

We carried out a qualitative descriptive study in four clinics of the Ministry of Health in two states of Mexico (Morelos and Hidalgo) from June 2016 to August 2018. We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with health care service providers, and we examined their perceptions and experiences during the implementation of the GPC model. We identified the barriers and facilitators for its adoption in two dimensions: a) structural (space, resources, health personnel, patient volume, community) and b) attitudinal (motivation, leadership, acceptability, address problems, work atmosphere and communication).

RESULTS

The most relevant barriers reported at the structural level were the availability of physical space in health units and the work overload of health personnel. We identified the difficulty in adopting a less hierarchical relationship during the pregnant women's care at the attitudinal level. The main facilitator at the attitudinal level was the acceptability that providers had of the model. One specific finding for Mexico's implementation context was the resistance to change the doctor-patient relationship; it is difficult to abandon the prevailing hierarchical model and change to a more horizontal relationship with pregnant women.

CONCLUSION

Analyzing the GPC model's implementation in Mexico, from the health care personnel's perspective, has revealed barriers and facilitators similar to the experiences in other contexts. Future efforts to adopt the model should focus on timely attention to identified barriers, especially those identified in the attitudinal dimension that can be modified by regular health care personnel training.

摘要

目的

从医疗保健人员的角度确定在墨西哥实施团体产前保健模式(GPC)的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们于 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 8 月在墨西哥两个州(莫雷洛斯州和伊达尔戈州)的卫生部的四个诊所进行了一项定性描述性研究。我们对 11 名医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,并检查了他们在实施 GPC 模式期间的看法和经验。我们从两个维度确定了采用该模式的障碍和促进因素:a)结构(空间、资源、卫生人员、患者量、社区)和 b)态度(动机、领导力、可接受性、解决问题、工作氛围和沟通)。

结果

报告的最相关的结构层面障碍是卫生单位的物理空间可用性和卫生人员的工作负荷过大。我们发现,在孕妇护理方面,态度层面上难以建立较少的等级关系。态度层面的主要促进因素是提供者对该模式的可接受性。墨西哥实施背景的一个具体发现是对变革的抵制,即很难放弃现有的医患关系,转而与孕妇建立更平等的关系。

结论

从医疗保健人员的角度分析 GPC 模式在墨西哥的实施情况,揭示了与其他背景下类似的障碍和促进因素。未来采用该模式的努力应重点关注已确定障碍的及时关注,特别是那些在态度维度上确定的障碍,这些障碍可以通过定期对医疗保健人员进行培训来加以修改。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/210edce1f431/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf02-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/c18f3e413597/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/9546cd23a89b/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/778627b45add/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf01-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/210edce1f431/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf02-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/c18f3e413597/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/9546cd23a89b/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/778627b45add/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf01-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7703532/210edce1f431/1518-8787-rsp-54-140-gf02-es.jpg

相似文献

1
Group Prenatal Care in Mexico: perspectives and experiences of health personnel.墨西哥的团体产前保健:卫生人员的观点和经验。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 14;54:140. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002175. eCollection 2020.
2
Engaging community health workers in maternal and newborn care in eastern Uganda.让社区卫生工作者参与乌干达东部的孕产妇和新生儿护理工作。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:23968. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.23968. eCollection 2015.
3
Barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and following childbirth: literature review and qualitative study.孕期及产后戒烟的障碍与促进因素:文献综述与定性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(36):1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta21360.
4
Youth-centered maternity care: a binational qualitative comparison of the experiences and perspectives of Latina adolescents and healthcare providers.以青年为中心的孕产妇护理:拉丁裔青少年与医疗服务提供者经历及观点的双边质性比较
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 2;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03831-4.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary healthcare: a qualitative study among Ugandan primary care providers using the COM-B framework.将心理健康服务纳入初级卫生保健的障碍与促进因素:一项使用COM-B框架对乌干达初级保健提供者进行的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3684-7.
6
Healthcare provider-patient communication: a qualitative study of women's perceptions during childbirth.医患沟通:一项关于女性分娩期间感知的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 13;15(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0580-x.
7
Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences.卢旺达实施团体产前护理前后:对妇女经验的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0750-5.
8
"I just wish it becomes part of routine care": healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of screening for maternal mental health during and after pregnancy: a qualitative study.“我只希望它成为常规护理的一部分”:医护人员在孕期和产后筛查孕产妇心理健康方面的知识、态度和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2261-x.
9
Primary care providers' experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健提供者在初级保健中照顾复杂患者的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0433-z.
10
Communication barriers in maternity care of allophone migrants: Experiences of women, healthcare professionals, and intercultural interpreters.移民孕产妇保健中的沟通障碍:女性、医疗保健专业人员和跨文化口译员的经验。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Oct;75(10):2200-2210. doi: 10.1111/jan.14093. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Achievements and Challenges in the Development of a Nurse-Led Respectful Delivery Care Model Provided by Partners in Health in Rural Mexico.墨西哥农村地区健康伙伴组织开展的由护士主导的尊重分娩护理模式的发展成果与挑战
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;42(1):435-443. doi: 10.1111/phn.13443. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation.群体产前保健:效果及实施面临的挑战。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Sep 30;53:85. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001303. eCollection 2019.
2
The Mexican Experience Adapting CenteringPregnancy: Lessons Learned in a Publicly Funded Health Care System Serving Vulnerable Women.墨西哥适应“以孕妇为中心”模式的经验:在为弱势妇女提供公共资助医疗保健系统中汲取的教训
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Sep 10;63(5):602-10. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12891.
3
Exploring perceptions of group antenatal Care in Urban India: results of a feasibility study.
探索印度城市群体产前护理的认知:一项可行性研究的结果。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0498-3.
4
Group antenatal care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic evidence synthesis.中低收入国家的群体产前保健模式:系统证据综合。
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 5;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0476-9.
5
[Inequity in maternal mortality in Mexico: analyzing inequality on a sub-state regional scale].[墨西哥孕产妇死亡率的不平等:在州以下区域层面分析不平等现象]
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 Nov-Dec;59(6):639-649. doi: 10.21149/8788.
6
Considerations for Implementing Group-Level Prenatal Health Interventions in Low-Resource Communities: Lessons Learned From Haiti.在资源匮乏社区实施群体层面产前健康干预措施的考量:来自海地的经验教训
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):121-126. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12684. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Barriers to utilisation of antenatal care services in South Sudan: a qualitative study in Rumbek North County.南苏丹产前护理服务利用的障碍:伦拜克北县的一项定性研究
Reprod Health. 2017 May 22;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0327-0.
8
The Impact of Introducing Centering Pregnancy in a Community Health Setting: A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perspectives of Health Center Clinical and Support Staff.在社区卫生环境中引入“以孕妇为中心”模式的影响:对健康中心临床及支持人员经历与观点的定性研究
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Jun;21(6):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2236-1.
9
Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: a national cross-sectional study in Mexico.衡量产前保健的充分性:墨西哥的一项全国性横断面研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):452-61. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.168302.
10
Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites.六个城市地区实施复杂的小组产前护理模式过程中对障碍和促进因素的认知
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):462-74. doi: 10.1002/nur.21681. Epub 2015 Sep 4.