Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health; Geriatrics Research Group, Reinickendorfer Str. 61, 13347, Berlin, Germany.
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, 66123, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01452-8. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Many digitalized cognitive assessments exist to increase reliability, standardization, and objectivity. Particularly in older adults, the performance of digitized cognitive assessments can lead to poorer test results if they are unfamiliar with the computer, mouse, keyboard, or touch screen. In a cross-over design study, 40 older adults (age M = 74.4 ± 4.1 years) conducted the Trail Making Test A and B with a digital pen (digital pen tests, DPT) and a regular pencil (pencil tests, PT) to identify differences in performance. Furthermore, the tests conducted with a digital pen were analyzed manually (manual results, MR) and electronically (electronic results, ER) by an automized system algorithm to determine the possibilities of digital pen evaluation. ICC(2,k) showed a good level of agreement for TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.668) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.734) between PT and DPT. When comparing MR and ER, ICC(2,k) showed an excellent level of agreement in TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.999) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.994). The frequency of pen lifting correlates significantly with the execution time in TMT A (r = 0.372, p = 0.030) and TMT B (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). A digital pen can be used to perform the Trail Making Test, as it has been shown that there is no difference in the results due to the type of pen used. With a digital pen, the advantages of digitized testing can be used without having to accept the disadvantages.
许多数字化认知评估方法的存在提高了可靠性、标准化和客观性。特别是在老年人中,如果他们不熟悉计算机、鼠标、键盘或触摸屏,那么数字化认知评估的表现可能会导致较差的测试结果。在一项交叉设计研究中,40 名老年人(年龄 M=74.4±4.1 岁)使用数字笔(数字笔测试,DPT)和普通铅笔(铅笔测试,PT)进行了连线测试 A 和 B,以确定性能差异。此外,通过自动化系统算法对手动(手动结果,MR)和电子(电子结果,ER)方式进行数字笔测试进行了分析,以确定数字笔评估的可能性。PT 和 DPT 之间的 TMT A(ICC(2,k)=0.668)和 TMT B(ICC(2,k)=0.734)的 ICC(2,k)显示出良好的一致性。当比较 MR 和 ER 时,TMT A(ICC(2,k)=0.999)和 TMT B(ICC(2,k)=0.994)的 ICC(2,k)显示出极好的一致性。笔抬起的频率与 TMT A(r=0.372,p=0.030)和 TMT B(r=0.567,p<0.001)的执行时间显著相关。数字笔可用于执行连线测试,因为已经证明由于使用的笔的类型,结果没有差异。使用数字笔,可以利用数字化测试的优势,而不必接受其缺点。