Suppr超能文献

衰老中计算机化认知测试的现状:一项系统综述。

Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review.

作者信息

Wild Katherine, Howieson Diane, Webbe Frank, Seelye Adriana, Kaye Jeffrey

机构信息

Layton Aging and Alzheimer Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Nov;4(6):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of cognitive decline in the elderly has become of heightened importance in parallel with the recent advances in therapeutics. Computerized assessment might be uniquely suited to early detection of changes in cognition in the elderly. We present here a systematic review of the status of computer-based cognitive testing, focusing on detection of cognitive decline in the aging population.

METHODS

All studies purporting to assess or detect age-related changes in cognition or early dementia/mild cognitive impairment by means of computerized testing were included. Each test battery was rated on availability of normative data, level of evidence for test validity and reliability, comprehensiveness, and usability. All published studies relevant to a particular computerized test were read by a minimum of two reviewers, who completed rating forms containing the above mentioned criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 18 test batteries identified from the initial search, 11 were appropriate to cognitive testing in the elderly and were subjected to systematic review. Of those 11, five were either developed specifically for application with the elderly or have been used extensively with that population. Even within the computerized testing genre, great variability existed in manner of administration, ranging from fully examiner-administered to fully self-administered. All tests had at least minimal reliability and validity data, commonly reported in peer-reviewed articles. However, level of rigor of validity testing varied widely.

CONCLUSION

All test batteries exhibited some of the strengths of computerized cognitive testing: standardization of administration and stimulus presentation, accurate measures of response latencies, automated comparison in real time with an individual's prior performance as well as with age-related norms, and efficiencies of staffing and cost. Some, such as the Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen, adapted complicated scoring algorithms to enhance the information gathered from already existing tests. Others, such as CogState, used unique interfaces and subtests. We found that although basic indices of psychometric properties were typically addressed, sufficient variability exists that currently available computerized test batteries must be judged on a case-by-case basis.

摘要

背景

随着近期治疗方法的进展,老年人认知功能衰退的早期检测变得愈发重要。计算机化评估可能特别适合于老年人认知变化的早期检测。我们在此对基于计算机的认知测试状况进行系统综述,重点关注老年人群认知衰退的检测。

方法

纳入所有旨在通过计算机化测试评估或检测与年龄相关的认知变化或早期痴呆/轻度认知障碍的研究。每个测试组合根据常模数据的可用性、测试有效性和可靠性的证据水平、全面性和可用性进行评分。与特定计算机化测试相关的所有已发表研究至少由两名评审员阅读,他们完成包含上述标准的评分表。

结果

从最初搜索中确定的18个测试组合中,11个适用于老年人的认知测试,并进行了系统综述。在这11个中,有5个是专门为老年人应用而开发的,或者在该人群中广泛使用。即使在计算机化测试类型中,管理方式也存在很大差异,从完全由考官管理到完全自我管理。所有测试都至少有最低限度的可靠性和有效性数据,通常在同行评审文章中报告。然而,有效性测试的严格程度差异很大。

结论

所有测试组合都展现出计算机化认知测试的一些优势:管理和刺激呈现的标准化、反应潜伏期的准确测量、与个体先前表现以及与年龄相关规范的实时自动比较,以及人员配备和成本效率。一些测试,如轻度认知障碍筛查,采用复杂的评分算法来增强从现有测试中收集的信息。其他测试,如CogState,使用独特的界面和子测试。我们发现,尽管心理测量学特性的基本指标通常得到解决,但存在足够的变异性,目前可用的计算机化测试组合必须逐案判断。

相似文献

1
Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review.
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Nov;4(6):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Efficacy of nicergoline in dementia and other age associated forms of cognitive impairment.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(4):CD003159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003159.
5
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
6
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
9
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
10
The effect of vitamin B6 on cognition.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD004393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004393.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Screening for Early Identification of Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2025 Jul-Aug;16(4):e70009. doi: 10.1002/wcs.70009.
2
Computerized neuropsychological assessment in post-COVID condition.
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0322304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322304. eCollection 2025.
3
Sociodemographic and health predictors of adherence to self-administered computerized cognitive assessment.
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 10;11:20552076251332774. doi: 10.1177/20552076251332774. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Cross-cultural adaption of the computerized assessment of information processing battery (COGNITO) for an Indian longitudinal study on rural elderly.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024 Dec 20;16(4):e70009. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70009. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Practicality of a computerized system for cognitive assessment in the elderly.
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jan;4(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.09.008.
2
Detecting cognitive impairment in primary care: performance assessment of three screening instruments.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2007 Jun;11(3):323-35. doi: 10.3233/jad-2007-11309.
4
ANAM genogram: historical perspectives, description, and current endeavors.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S15-37. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.013. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
5
Initial construct validation of frequently employed ANAM measures through structural equation modeling.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
6
Assessing change with the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM): issues and challenges.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
7
Identifying and monitoring cognitive deficits in clinical populations using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) tests.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.006. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
8
Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Development and quality assurance of computer-based assessment batteries.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
10
Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验