• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SARS-CoV-2 相关感染评分的预检概率:PARIS 评分。

Pre-test probability for SARS-Cov-2-related infection score: The PARIS score.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.

Department of Radiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243342. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243342
PMID:33332360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7745977/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In numerous countries, large population testing is impossible due to the limited availability of RT-PCR kits and CT-scans. This study aimed to determine a pre-test probability score for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study (4 University Hospitals) included patients with clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and results of blood tests (complete white blood cell count, serum electrolytes and CRP) were collected. A pre-test probability score was derived from univariate analyses of clinical and biological variables between patients and controls, followed by multivariate binary logistic analysis to determine the independent variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

RESULTS

605 patients were included between March 10th and April 30th, 2020 (200 patients for the training cohort, 405 consecutive patients for the validation cohort). In the multivariate analysis, lymphocyte (<1.3 G/L), eosinophil (<0.06 G/L), basophil (<0.04 G/L) and neutrophil counts (<5 G/L) were associated with high probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection but no clinical variable was statistically significant. The score had a good performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.918 (CI: [0.891-0.946]; STD = 0.014) with a Positive Predictive Value of high-probability score of 93% (95%CI: [0.89-0.96]). Furthermore, a low-probability score excluded SARS-CoV-2 infection with a Negative Predictive Value of 98% (95%CI: [0.93-0.99]). The performance of the score was stable even during the last period of the study (15-30th April) with more controls than infected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The PARIS score has a good performance to categorize the pre-test probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on complete white blood cell count. It could help clinicians adapt testing and for rapid triage of patients before test results.

摘要

简介

在许多国家,由于实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)试剂盒和计算机断层扫描(CT)的数量有限,大规模人群检测是不可能的。本研究旨在确定 SARS-CoV-2 感染的预测概率评分。

方法

这是一项多中心回顾性研究(4 所大学医院),纳入了临床疑似 SARS-CoV-2 感染的患者。收集了人口统计学特征、临床症状以及血液检查结果(白细胞总数、血清电解质和 C 反应蛋白)。通过对患者和对照组之间的临床和生物学变量进行单因素分析,得出预测概率评分,然后进行多变量二元逻辑分析,确定与 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的独立变量。

结果

2020 年 3 月 10 日至 4 月 30 日期间共纳入 605 例患者(训练队列 200 例,验证队列连续 405 例)。多变量分析显示,淋巴细胞(<1.3 G/L)、嗜酸性粒细胞(<0.06 G/L)、嗜碱性粒细胞(<0.04 G/L)和中性粒细胞计数(<5 G/L)与 SARS-CoV-2 感染的高概率相关,但无临床变量具有统计学意义。该评分在验证队列中的表现良好(AUC = 0.918(CI:[0.891-0.946];STD = 0.014),高概率评分的阳性预测值为 93%(95%CI:[0.89-0.96])。此外,低概率评分可排除 SARS-CoV-2 感染,阴性预测值为 98%(95%CI:[0.93-0.99])。即使在研究的最后阶段(4 月 15 日至 30 日),感染患者数量少于对照组,该评分的性能也保持稳定。

结论

PARIS 评分可根据白细胞总数对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的预测概率进行分类,有助于临床医生调整检测,并在检测结果出来之前对患者进行快速分诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7017/7745977/0489933a6035/pone.0243342.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7017/7745977/116c4ecae4ab/pone.0243342.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7017/7745977/0489933a6035/pone.0243342.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7017/7745977/116c4ecae4ab/pone.0243342.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7017/7745977/0489933a6035/pone.0243342.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-test probability for SARS-Cov-2-related infection score: The PARIS score.SARS-CoV-2 相关感染评分的预检概率:PARIS 评分。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243342. eCollection 2020.
2
[Repetition of microbiological tests in suspect of SARS-CoV-2 infection: utility of a score based on clinical probability].[对疑似SARS-CoV-2感染进行微生物学检测的重复:基于临床概率的评分的效用]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Dec;33(6):410-414. doi: 10.37201/req/080.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
3
PARIS score for evaluation of probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients.PARIS 评分用于评估癌症患者 SARS-CoV-2 感染的概率。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7635-7643. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07199-9. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
5
Routine laboratory testing to determine if a patient has COVID-19.进行常规实验室检测以确定患者是否感染新冠病毒。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 19;11(11):CD013787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013787.
6
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pre-test probability on positive predictive value of high cycle threshold severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)检测前概率对高循环阈值严重急性呼吸冠状病毒病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测结果阳性预测值的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1179-1183. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.369. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
8
Association between new-onset anosmia and positive SARS-CoV-2 tests among people accessing outpatient testing in Toronto, Ontario: a retrospective cross-sectional study.安大略省多伦多市接受门诊检测人群中新发嗅觉丧失与 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性之间的关联:一项回顾性横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 7;9(4):E1134-E1140. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210085. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
9
Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at the emergency department using routine testing.在急诊科使用常规检测快速识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 29;58(9):1587-1593. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0593. Print 2020 Aug 27.
10
Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.LumiraDx 快速抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073826.

引用本文的文献

1
Eosinophils as potential biomarkers in respiratory viral infections.嗜酸性粒细胞作为呼吸道病毒感染的潜在生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1170035. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1170035. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessment of COVID-19 RT-PCR Positive Symptomatic Patients With Clinical, Hematological, and Radiological Parameters Among Three Groups: A Comparative Study.三组中COVID-19逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性有症状患者的临床、血液学和放射学参数评估:一项比较研究
Cureus. 2023 May 30;15(5):e39681. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39681. eCollection 2023 May.
3
CT Examinations for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Radiation Dose, and Numbers Needed to Diagnose and Predict.

本文引用的文献

1
Eosinopenia and COVID-19.嗜酸性粒细胞减少与新型冠状病毒肺炎
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Jul 16. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.091.
2
Differentiating Between 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia and Influenza Using a Nonspecific Laboratory Marker-Based Dynamic Nomogram.使用基于非特异性实验室标志物的动态列线图鉴别2019新型冠状病毒肺炎和流感
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 May 16;7(5):ofaa169. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa169. eCollection 2020 May.
3
A Comparison of Clinical and Chest CT Findings in Patients With Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Infection and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).
用于新型冠状病毒肺炎的CT检查:对方案、辐射剂量以及诊断和预测所需数量的系统评价
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Nov;82(6):1505-1523. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0096. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
4
Development and validation of an early warning score to identify COVID-19 in the emergency department based on routine laboratory tests: a multicentre case-control study.基于常规实验室检测的急诊 COVID-19 预警评分的开发和验证:一项多中心病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 3;12(8):e059111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059111.
5
Symptom-Based COVID-19 Prognosis through AI-Based IoT: A Bioinformatics Approach.基于 AI 的物联网的基于症状的 COVID-19 预后:一种生物信息学方法。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 23;2022:3113119. doi: 10.1155/2022/3113119. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD).评估临床实践中识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断策略:系统评价及对诊断准确性研究报告标准(STARD)的遵循情况。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0030022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00300-22. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Prediction of COVID-19 using long short-term memory by integrating principal component analysis and clustering techniques.通过整合主成分分析和聚类技术,利用长短期记忆网络预测新型冠状病毒肺炎
Inform Med Unlocked. 2022;31:100990. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.100990. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Clinical prediction models for diagnosis of COVID-19 among adult patients: a validation and agreement study.临床预测模型在成年患者 COVID-19 诊断中的应用:验证和一致性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 14;22(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07420-4.
10
Machine learning approaches in Covid-19 severity risk prediction in Morocco.摩洛哥新冠疫情严重程度风险预测中的机器学习方法。
J Big Data. 2022;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00557-0. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
甲型流感病毒(H1N1)感染与新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的临床和胸部 CT 表现比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1065-1071. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23214. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Eosinophil responses during COVID-19 infections and coronavirus vaccination.COVID-19 感染和冠状病毒疫苗接种期间的嗜酸性粒细胞反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;146(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Diagnostic Performance of CT and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis.CT 与逆转录聚合酶链反应检测 2019 年冠状病毒病的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E145-E155. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201343. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
COVID-19 Autopsies, Oklahoma, USA.美国俄克拉荷马州的 COVID-19 尸检。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 May 5;153(6):725-733. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa062.
7
Prediction for Progression Risk in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: The CALL Score.COVID-19 肺炎患者进展风险预测:CALL 评分。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1393-1399. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa414.
8
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
9
The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society.《COVID-19 大流行期间患者管理中的胸部影像学作用:Fleischner 学会的一项多国共识声明》。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):172-180. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201365. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
10
Characteristics of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subset Alteration in COVID-19 Pneumonia.新型冠状病毒肺炎外周血淋巴细胞亚群特征变化。
J Infect Dis. 2020 May 11;221(11):1762-1769. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa150.