Suppr超能文献

2005 - 2018年普通医学期刊中儿科和成人随机对照试验的发表趋势:一项引文分析

Publication Trends of Pediatric and Adult Randomized Controlled Trials in General Medical Journals, 2005-2018: A Citation Analysis.

作者信息

Groff Michael L, Offringa Martin, Emdin Abby, Mahood Quenby, Parkin Patricia C, Cohen Eyal

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada.

Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;7(12):293. doi: 10.3390/children7120293.

Abstract

Policy has been developed to promote the conduct of high-quality pediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Whether these strategies have influenced publication trends in high-impact journals is unknown. We aim to evaluate characteristics, citation patterns, and publication trends of pediatric RCTs published in general medical journals (GMJs) compared with adult RCTs over a 13-year period. Studies were identified using Medline, and impact metrics were collected from Web of Science and Scopus. All RCTs published from 2005-2018 in 7 GMJs with the highest impact factors were identified for analysis. A random sample of matched pediatric and adult RCTs were assessed for publication characteristics, academic and non-academic citation. Citations were counted from publication until June 2019. Among 4146 RCTs, 2794 (67.3%) enrolled adults, 591 (14.2%) enrolled children, and 761 RCTs (18.3%) enrolled adult and pediatric patients. Adult RCTs published in GMJs grew by 5.1 publications per year (95% CI: 3.3-6.9), while the number of pediatric RCTs did not show significant change (-0.4 RCTs/year, 95% CI: -1.4-0.6). Adult RCTs were cited more than pediatric RCTs (median(IQR): 29.9 (68.5-462.8) citations/year vs. 13.2 (6.8-24.9) citations/year; < 0.001); however, social media attention was similar (median(IQR) Altmetric Attention Score: 37 (13.75-133.8) vs. 26 (6.2-107.5); = 0.25). Despite policies which may facilitate conduct of pediatric RCTs, the publishing gap in high-impact GMJs is widening.

摘要

已制定政策以促进高质量儿科随机对照试验(RCT)的开展。这些策略是否影响了高影响力期刊的发表趋势尚不清楚。我们旨在评估13年间发表在综合医学期刊(GMJ)上的儿科RCT与成人RCT相比的特征、引用模式和发表趋势。通过Medline识别研究,并从科学网和Scopus收集影响指标。确定了2005年至2018年在7种影响因子最高的GMJ上发表的所有RCT进行分析。对匹配的儿科和成人RCT随机样本进行发表特征、学术和非学术引用评估。从发表到2019年6月统计引用次数。在4146项RCT中,2794项(67.3%)纳入成人,591项(14.2%)纳入儿童,761项RCT(18.3%)纳入成人和儿科患者。GMJ上发表的成人RCT每年增加5.1篇(95%CI:3.3 - 6.9),而儿科RCT数量未显示显著变化(-0.4项RCT/年,95%CI:-1.4 - 0.6)。成人RCT的被引用次数多于儿科RCT(中位数(IQR):每年29.9(68.5 - 462.8)次引用 vs. 13.2(6.8 - 24.9)次引用;<0.001);然而,社交媒体关注度相似(中位数(IQR)Altmetric关注度得分:37(13.75 - 133.8) vs. 26(6.2 - 107.5);=0.25)。尽管有政策可能促进儿科RCT的开展,但高影响力GMJ上的发表差距正在扩大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/7765242/359239e187f9/children-07-00293-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验