Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;20(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2.
Emergency risk communication is a critical component in emergency planning and response. It has been recognised as significant for planning for and responding to public health emergencies. While there is a growing body of guidelines and frameworks on emergency risk communication, it remains a relatively new field. There has also been limited attention on how emergency risk communication is being performed in public health organisations, such as acute hospitals, and what the associated challenges are. This article seeks to examine the perception of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in response to COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore and to identify its associated enablers and barriers.
A 13-item Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Survey, based on the US Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) CERC framework, was developed and administered to hospital staff during February 24-28, 2020. The survey also included an open-ended question to solicit feedback on areas of CERC in need of improvement. Chi-square test was used for analysis of survey data. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative feedback.
Of the 1154 participants who responded to the survey, most (94.1%) reported that regular hospital updates on COVID-19 were understandable and actionable. Many (92.5%) stated that accurate, concise and timely information helped to keep them safe. A majority (92.3%) of them were clear about the hospital's response to the COVID-19 situation, and 79.4% of the respondents reported that the hospital had been able to understand their challenges and address their concerns. Sociodemographic characteristics, such as occupation, age, marital status, work experience, gender, and staff's primary work location influenced the responses to hospital CERC. Local leaders within the hospital would need support to better communicate and translate hospital updates in response to COVID-19 to actionable plans for their staff. Better communication in executing resource utilization plans, expressing more empathy and care for their staff, and enhancing communication channels, such as through the use of secure text messaging rather than emails would be important.
CERC is relevant and important in the hospital setting to managing COVID-19 and should be considered concurrently with hospital emergency response domains.
紧急风险沟通是应急规划和响应的重要组成部分。它已被认为对规划和应对公共卫生紧急情况至关重要。虽然有越来越多的关于紧急风险沟通的准则和框架,但它仍然是一个相对较新的领域。对于紧急风险沟通在急性医院等公共卫生组织中的实施情况以及相关挑战,关注也很有限。本文旨在探讨新加坡一家急性医院在应对 COVID-19 大流行时对危机和紧急风险沟通的看法,并确定其相关的促成因素和障碍。
根据美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的 CERC 框架,开发了一份包含 13 个项目的危机和紧急风险沟通(CERC)调查,并于 2020 年 2 月 24 日至 28 日分发给医院工作人员。调查还包括一个开放式问题,以征求对需要改进的 CERC 领域的反馈。使用卡方检验分析调查数据。对定性反馈进行了主题分析。
在 1154 名回应调查的参与者中,大多数(94.1%)表示,医院定期更新有关 COVID-19 的信息是可以理解和采取行动的。许多人(92.5%)表示,准确、简明和及时的信息有助于保证他们的安全。大多数人(92.3%)清楚医院对 COVID-19 情况的反应,79.4%的受访者表示医院能够理解他们的挑战并解决他们的关切。医院工作人员的社会人口统计学特征,如职业、年龄、婚姻状况、工作经验、性别和主要工作地点,影响了他们对医院 CERC 的反应。医院内的当地领导需要支持,以便更好地沟通并将医院针对 COVID-19 的更新转化为针对其员工的可操作计划。在执行资源利用计划时更好地沟通,对员工表示更多的同情和关怀,以及加强沟通渠道,例如通过使用安全短信而不是电子邮件,将是很重要的。
在医院环境中,CERC 与医院应急响应领域一样重要,对于管理 COVID-19 应予以考虑。