Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Safety Program Development Branch, Research and Evaluation Office, Toronto, Canada; The University of New South Wales, School of Population Health, Sydney, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Safety Program Development Branch, Research and Evaluation Office, Toronto, Canada.
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Drivers with medical conditions and functional impairments are at increased collision risk. A challenge lies in identifying the point at which such risk becomes unacceptable to society and requires mitigating measures. This study models the road safety impact of medical fitness-to-drive policy in Ontario.
Using data from 2005 to 2014, we estimated the losses to road safety incurred during the time medically-at-risk drivers were under review, as well as the savings to road safety accrued as a result of licensing decisions made after the review process.
While under review, drivers with medical conditions had an age- and sex-standardized collision rate no different from the general driver population, suggesting no road safety losses occurred (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.93-1.12). Licensing decisions were estimated to have subsequently prevented 1,211 (95% CI: 780-1,730) collisions, indicating net road safety savings resulting from medical fitness to drive policies. However, more collisions occurred than were prevented for drivers with musculoskeletal disorders, sleep apnea, and diabetes. We theorize on these findings and discuss its multiple implications.
Minimizing the impact of medical conditions on collision occurrence requires robust policies that balance fairness and safety. It is dependent on efforts by academic researchers (who study fitness to drive); policymakers (who set driver medical standards); licensing authorities (who make licensing decisions under such standards); and clinicians (who counsel patients on their driving risk and liaise with licensing authorities). Practical Applications: Further efforts are needed to improve understanding of the effects of medical conditions on collision risk, especially for the identified conditions and combinations of conditions. Results reinforce the value of optimizing the processes by which information is solicited from physicians in order to better assess the functional impact of drivers' medical conditions on driving and to take suitable licensing action.
患有疾病和身体功能障碍的驾驶员发生碰撞的风险增加。挑战在于确定这种风险变得不可接受并需要采取缓解措施的临界点。本研究对安大略省的医疗驾驶适应性政策对道路安全的影响进行了建模。
使用 2005 年至 2014 年的数据,我们估算了在有医疗问题的驾驶员接受审查期间因道路安全而造成的损失,以及审查过程后因驾驶执照决定而获得的道路安全节省。
在审查期间,患有疾病的驾驶员的年龄和性别标准化碰撞率与一般驾驶员人群没有区别,这表明没有发生道路安全损失(RR=1.02;95%CI:0.93-1.12)。据估计,驾驶执照决定随后预防了 1211 起(95%CI:780-1730)碰撞,表明医疗驾驶适应性政策带来了净道路安全节省。然而,对于患有肌肉骨骼疾病、睡眠呼吸暂停和糖尿病的驾驶员,发生的碰撞比预防的碰撞多。我们对这些发现进行了理论探讨,并讨论了其多重影响。
最大限度地减少医疗条件对碰撞发生的影响需要制定稳健的政策,平衡公平性和安全性。这取决于学术研究人员(研究驾驶适应性)、政策制定者(制定驾驶员医疗标准)、许可机构(在这些标准下做出许可决定)和临床医生(向患者提供驾驶风险咨询并与许可机构联系)的努力。
需要进一步努力,以更好地了解医疗条件对碰撞风险的影响,特别是对于已确定的条件和条件组合。研究结果强化了优化从医生那里收集信息的过程的价值,以便更好地评估驾驶员医疗条件对驾驶的功能影响,并采取适当的许可措施。