• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大应采取协调一致的循证 OEL 以持续且充分地保护工人。

Canada Should Move Toward Adopting Harmonized Evidence-Based OELs to Consistently and Adequately Protect Workers.

机构信息

CAREX Canada, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Harbour Center Campus, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Anya Keefe Consulting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):367-372. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa110.

DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxaa110
PMID:33336241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8091453/
Abstract

Due to the way occupational exposure limits (OELs) are set in Canada, workers across the country are not equally and adequately protected from harmful workplace exposures. This disparity is illustrated in the case of exposure to diesel engine exhaust (DEE). Based on the findings of a recent pan-Canadian and international scan of OELs for DEE, we recommend that Canada overcome these current disparities by moving towards harmonized, evidence-based OELs. To achieve this, Canada should adopt a centralized framework for setting OELs that considers the most recent scientific evidence as well as feasibility of implementation in the Canadian context. We assert that harmonizing OELs across Canada would allow for expertise and resources to be consolidated and is a crucial step to ensuring that all workers are consistently protected from harmful workplace exposures.

摘要

由于加拿大设定职业接触限值 (OEL) 的方式,全国各地的工人并没有得到平等和充分的保护,免受有害的工作场所接触。这种差异在接触柴油机废气 (DEE) 的情况下得到了体现。基于最近对加拿大和国际范围内 DEE 的 OEL 进行的全面扫描的结果,我们建议加拿大通过采用基于证据的统一 OEL 来克服这些当前的差距。为了实现这一目标,加拿大应该采用一种集中的 OEL 设置框架,该框架考虑了最新的科学证据以及在加拿大背景下实施的可行性。我们断言,在加拿大范围内协调 OEL 将允许整合专业知识和资源,是确保所有工人始终受到有害工作场所接触保护的关键步骤。

相似文献

1
Canada Should Move Toward Adopting Harmonized Evidence-Based OELs to Consistently and Adequately Protect Workers.加拿大应采取协调一致的循证 OEL 以持续且充分地保护工人。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):367-372. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa110.
2
Occupational Exposure to Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhausts and the Risk of Kidney Cancer in Canadian Men.职业性接触柴油机和汽油机废气与加拿大男性肾癌风险的关系。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Oct 15;62(8):978-989. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy059.
3
[Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].[中国GBZ 2.1与美国ACGIH工作场所化学物质职业接触限值的比较研究]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;32(1):1-26.
4
Burden of lung cancer attributable to occupational diesel engine exhaust exposure in Canada.加拿大归因于职业性柴油机排气接触的肺癌负担。
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Sep;75(9):617-622. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104950. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
5
Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.韩国对职业接触限值进行了广泛修改。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
6
The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.职业接触限值的全球格局——实施协调原则以指导限值选择
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1060327.
7
A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.一项针对瑞典工作场所化学风险管理人员对职业接触限值和 REACH 衍生无效应水平的态度的范围调查。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):611-620. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01493. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
The Australian Work Exposures Study: prevalence of occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust.澳大利亚工作场所暴露研究:职业性接触柴油机废气的患病率
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Jun;59(5):600-8. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev006. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
9
Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.职业接触限值:一项比较研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;50(2):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.12.004. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
10
Career fire hall exposures to diesel engine exhaust in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省职业消防站接触柴油机废气情况。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Jan;17(1):38-46. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1691729. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing occupational radon exposure greater than 100 Bq/m in a highly exposed country.描述一个高度接触氡的国家中职业性氡暴露大于 100 Bq/m 的情况。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25547-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Setting up a collaborative European human biological monitoring study on occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium.建立一个关于职业性六价铬暴露的欧洲人类生物监测合作研究。
Environ Res. 2019 Oct;177:108583. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108583. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
Diesel Engine Exhaust: Basis for Occupational Exposure Limit Value.柴油机废气:职业接触限值的基础。
Toxicol Sci. 2017 Aug 1;158(2):243-251. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx110.
3
DIESEL AND GASOLINE ENGINE EXHAUSTS AND SOME NITROARENES. IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC RISKS TO HUMANS.柴油和汽油发动机尾气以及某些硝基芳烃。国际癌症研究机构关于对人类致癌风险评估的专论。
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2014;105:9-699.
4
The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.职业接触限值的全球格局——实施协调原则以指导限值选择
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1060327.