• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般机器学习模型和疾病特异性机器学习模型在预测非计划性住院再入院方面的比较。

A comparison of general and disease-specific machine learning models for the prediction of unplanned hospital readmissions.

机构信息

Medical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):868-873. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa299.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa299
PMID:33338231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7973448/
Abstract

Unplanned hospital readmissions are a burden to patients and increase healthcare costs. A wide variety of machine learning (ML) models have been suggested to predict unplanned hospital readmissions. These ML models were often specifically trained on patient populations with certain diseases. However, it is unclear whether these specialized ML models-trained on patient subpopulations with certain diseases or defined by other clinical characteristics-are more accurate than a general ML model trained on an unrestricted hospital cohort. In this study based on an electronic health record cohort of consecutive inpatient cases of a single tertiary care center, we demonstrate that accurate prediction of hospital readmissions may be obtained by general, disease-independent, ML models. This general approach may substantially decrease the cost of development and deployment of respective ML models in daily clinical routine, as all predictions are obtained by the use of a single model.

摘要

非计划性住院再入院给患者带来负担,并增加医疗保健成本。已经提出了各种各样的机器学习 (ML) 模型来预测非计划性住院再入院。这些 ML 模型通常是针对特定疾病的患者人群进行专门训练的。然而,尚不清楚这些专门针对特定疾病或其他临床特征的患者亚群进行训练的 ML 模型是否比针对不受限制的住院患者队列进行训练的通用 ML 模型更准确。在这项基于单个三级护理中心连续住院病例的电子健康记录队列的研究中,我们证明了通过通用的、与疾病无关的 ML 模型可以实现对医院再入院的准确预测。这种通用方法可以大大降低在日常临床常规中开发和部署各自的 ML 模型的成本,因为所有预测都是通过使用单个模型获得的。

相似文献

1
A comparison of general and disease-specific machine learning models for the prediction of unplanned hospital readmissions.一般机器学习模型和疾病特异性机器学习模型在预测非计划性住院再入院方面的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):868-873. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa299.
2
Prediction of early unplanned intensive care unit readmission in a UK tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional machine learning approach.英国一家三级护理医院早期非计划重症监护病房再入院的预测:一种横断面机器学习方法。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 15;7(9):e017199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017199.
3
Using machine learning to predict paediatric 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: a case-control retrospective analysis of medical records, including written discharge documentation.使用机器学习预测儿科 30 天内非计划性住院再入院率:病历回顾性病例对照研究,包括书面出院记录。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):328-337. doi: 10.1071/AH20062.
4
PREDICTIVE MODELING OF HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-WIDE MACHINE LEARNING: A CASE-STUDY USING MOUNT SINAI HEART FAILURE COHORT.使用全电子病历机器学习对医院再入院率进行预测建模:以西奈山心力衰竭队列为例的研究
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:276-287. doi: 10.1142/9789813207813_0027.
5
Machine Learning Prediction of Postoperative Emergency Department Hospital Readmission.机器学习预测术后急诊再次住院。
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):968-980. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003140.
6
Predictors of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Carotid Artery Stenting Using Artificial Intelligence.使用人工智能预测颈动脉支架置入术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的因素。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):2954-2972. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01709-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
7
A 5-year retrospective cohort study of unplanned readmissions in an Australian tertiary paediatric hospital.一项针对澳大利亚一家三级儿科医院非计划再次入院情况的5年回顾性队列研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):662-671. doi: 10.1071/AH18123.
8
Using machine learning to reduce unnecessary rehospitalization of cardiovascular patients in Saudi Arabia.利用机器学习减少沙特阿拉伯心血管疾病患者的不必要再住院情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Oct;154:104565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104565. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for 30-Day Readmission after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.基于机器学习的慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院后 30 天再入院预测模型。
COPD. 2019 Dec;16(5-6):338-343. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1688278. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
10
A hospital wide predictive model for unplanned readmission using hierarchical ICD data.基于 ICD 数据的层级结构的全院范围预测性模型,用于预测非计划性再入院。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 May;173:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Anthropometric, Nutritional, and Lifestyle Factors Involved in Predicting Food Addiction: An Agnostic Machine Learning Approach.预测食物成瘾的人体测量学、营养和生活方式因素:一种无偏机器学习方法。
Diseases. 2025 Jul 24;13(8):236. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080236.
2
Machine Learning and Interpretability Study for Predicting 30-Day Unplanned Readmission Risk of Schizophrenia: A Retrospective Study.用于预测精神分裂症30天非计划再入院风险的机器学习与可解释性研究:一项回顾性研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jul 28;21:1509-1521. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S522675. eCollection 2025.
3
Artificial intelligence in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery for clinical outcome prediction: current perspective and future direction.人工智能在肝胰胆外科临床结局预测中的应用:现状与未来方向。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 31;19(1):438. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02617-6.
4
Intelligent health in the IS area: A literature review and research agenda.信息系统领域的智能健康:文献综述与研究议程。
Fundam Res. 2023 May 11;4(4):961-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.008. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
A hybrid machine learning framework to improve prediction of all-cause rehospitalization among elderly patients in Hong Kong.一种混合机器学习框架,用于提高对香港老年患者全因再住院的预测能力。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01824-1.
6
Machine Learning-Based Short-Term Mortality Prediction Models for Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.基于机器学习利用电子健康记录数据对癌症患者进行短期死亡率预测的模型:系统评价与批判性评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 14;10(3):e33182. doi: 10.2196/33182.
7
Machine learning for predicting readmission risk among the frail: Explainable AI for healthcare.用于预测体弱患者再入院风险的机器学习:医疗保健领域的可解释人工智能。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Dec 3;3(1):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100395. eCollection 2022 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Secondary use of routine data in hospitals: description of a scalable analytical platform based on a business intelligence system.医院常规数据的二次利用:基于商业智能系统的可扩展分析平台描述
JAMIA Open. 2018 Sep 20;1(2):172-177. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy039. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Hospital readmission risk prediction based on claims data available at admission: a pilot study in Switzerland.基于入院时可获得的理赔数据的医院再入院风险预测:瑞士的一项试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 29;9(6):e028409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028409.
3
Neural networks versus Logistic regression for 30 days all-cause readmission prediction.神经网络与逻辑回归在 30 天全因再入院预测中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 26;9(1):9277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45685-z.
4
Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Implementation With Readmission and Mortality Outcomes in Heart Failure.医院再入院率降低计划实施与心力衰竭患者再入院和死亡率结局的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;3(1):44-53. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4265.
5
Impact of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program on Surgical Readmissions Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医院再入院减少计划对医疗保险受益人的手术再入院情况的影响。
Ann Surg. 2017 Oct;266(4):617-624. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002368.
6
A comparison of models for predicting early hospital readmissions.预测早期医院再入院的模型比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Hospital readmissions reduction program.医院再入院率降低计划。
Circulation. 2015 May 19;131(20):1796-803. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010270.
8
Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: derivation and validation of a prediction model.医疗患者中潜在可避免的 30 天内再次住院:预测模型的推导和验证。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):632-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3023.
9
Risk factors of hospitalization and readmission of patients with COPD exacerbation--systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者住院及再入院的危险因素——系统评价
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2(3):241-51.