From Decisions, Operations, and Technology Management Area, Anderson School of Management (V.V.M., K.R.) Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (E.G., I.H.), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (A.M.).
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):968-980. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003140.
Although prediction of hospital readmissions has been studied in medical patients, it has received relatively little attention in surgical patient populations. Published predictors require information only available at the moment of discharge. The authors hypothesized that machine learning approaches can be leveraged to accurately predict readmissions in postoperative patients from the emergency department. Further, the authors hypothesize that these approaches can accurately predict the risk of readmission much sooner than hospital discharge.
Using a cohort of surgical patients at a tertiary care academic medical center, surgical, demographic, lab, medication, care team, and current procedural terminology data were extracted from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was whether there existed a future hospital readmission originating from the emergency department within 30 days of surgery. Secondarily, the time interval from surgery to the prediction was analyzed at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h. Different machine learning models for predicting the primary outcome were evaluated with respect to the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve metric using different permutations of the available features.
Surgical hospital admissions (N = 34,532) from April 2013 to December 2016 were included in the analysis. Surgical and demographic features led to moderate discrimination for prediction after discharge (area under the curve: 0.74 to 0.76), whereas medication, consulting team, and current procedural terminology features did not improve the discrimination. Lab features improved discrimination, with gradient-boosted trees attaining the best performance (area under the curve: 0.866, SD 0.006). This performance was sustained during temporal validation with 2017 to 2018 data (area under the curve: 0.85 to 0.88). Lastly, the discrimination of the predictions calculated 36 h after surgery (area under the curve: 0.88 to 0.89) nearly matched those from time of discharge.
A machine learning approach to predicting postoperative readmission can produce hospital-specific models for accurately predicting 30-day readmissions via the emergency department. Moreover, these predictions can be confidently calculated at 36 h after surgery without consideration of discharge-level data.
虽然在医疗患者中已经研究了医院再入院的预测,但在外科患者中,这方面的研究相对较少。已发表的预测因素仅需要在出院时的信息。作者假设可以利用机器学习方法准确预测急诊部门手术后患者的再入院情况。此外,作者假设这些方法可以比出院更早地准确预测再入院的风险。
使用一家三级保健学术医疗中心的外科患者队列,从电子健康记录中提取外科、人口统计学、实验室、药物、护理团队和当前程序术语数据。主要结果是在手术后 30 天内是否有从急诊部门开始的未来医院再入院。其次,分析了从手术到预测的时间间隔,时间间隔为 0、12、24、36、48 和 60 小时。使用不同的特征排列方式,评估了用于预测主要结果的不同机器学习模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积指标。
分析中纳入了 2013 年 4 月至 2016 年 12 月期间的外科住院患者(N=34532)。外科和人口统计学特征导致出院后预测的中等程度区分(曲线下面积:0.74 至 0.76),而药物、咨询团队和当前程序术语特征并未提高区分度。实验室特征提高了区分度,梯度提升树的表现最佳(曲线下面积:0.866,SD 0.006)。在使用 2017 年至 2018 年的数据进行时间验证时,这种性能得以维持(曲线下面积:0.85 至 0.88)。最后,手术 36 小时后计算的预测的区分度(曲线下面积:0.88 至 0.89)几乎与出院时的预测值相匹配。
一种用于预测术后再入院的机器学习方法可以通过急诊部门为每个医院创建模型,准确预测 30 天的再入院率。此外,这些预测无需考虑出院水平的数据,即可在手术后 36 小时内有信心地计算。