• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性冠状动脉疾病患者的冠状动脉血运重建治疗的医疗分析:多中心 REVASK 研究:设计和方案。

Health Care Analysis on Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter REVASK Study: Design and Protocol.

机构信息

German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS), Berlin, Germany.

University of Education, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):599-606. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721391. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721391
PMID:33339068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8519729/
Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are available for revascularization of coronary artery disease (CAD) with the aims to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and to improve disease-related quality of life in particular. The German National Care Guideline (NVL-cKHK) on chronic CAD recommends the establishment of so-called heart teams for decision making in myocardial revascularization to improve the quality of care. Preferred recommendations for PCI or CABG are given for different patient subgroups depending on patient characteristics, concomitant diseases, and coronary morphology. The myocardial revascularization study (REVASK) is a noninterventional cohort study on care of patients undergoing PCI or CABG based on retrospective statutory health insurance (SHI) routine data, registry data from the German Cardiac Society (DGK) resp., the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG), combined with prospective primary data collection from health care providers and patients. The primary goal is to investigate whether and to which extent heart teams, consisting of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons, increase guideline adherence in decision making for myocardial revascularization. Ultimately the study project aims to improve patient care in terms of decision making for appropriate myocardial revascularization. Through the consistent implementation of the German National Care Guideline on chronic Coronary Artery Disease (NVL-cKHK) and the European Guidelines on myocardial revascularization, the reduction of morbidity, mortality and the reduced need for subsequent revascularization procedures are also desirable from a health economics perspective.

摘要

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可用于治疗冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的血运重建,目的是降低心血管发病率和死亡率,并特别改善与疾病相关的生活质量。德国国家护理指南(NVL-cKHK)建议为心肌血运重建建立所谓的心脏团队,以提高护理质量。根据患者特征、合并症和冠状动脉形态,为不同的患者亚组推荐 PCI 或 CABG 的首选建议。心肌血运重建研究(REVASK)是一项基于回顾性法定健康保险(SHI)常规数据、德国心脏病学会(DGK)或德国胸心血管外科学会(DGTHG)的登记数据的非干预性队列研究,结合来自医疗保健提供者和患者的前瞻性主要数据收集。主要目标是研究心脏团队(由心脏病专家和心脏外科医生组成)是否以及在多大程度上增加了心肌血运重建决策的指南依从性。最终,研究项目旨在改善患者在适当的心肌血运重建决策方面的护理。从卫生经济学的角度来看,通过一致实施慢性冠状动脉疾病的德国国家护理指南(NVL-cKHK)和欧洲心肌血运重建指南,还期望降低发病率、死亡率和随后血运重建手术的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/fee98a173f76/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/f8a6116f106c/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/6d490145e695/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/334fdf8eae92/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/7bdffc726834/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/fee98a173f76/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/f8a6116f106c/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/6d490145e695/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/334fdf8eae92/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/7bdffc726834/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d5/8519729/fee98a173f76/10-1055-s-0040-1721391-i206062oc-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Care Analysis on Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter REVASK Study: Design and Protocol.慢性冠状动脉疾病患者的冠状动脉血运重建治疗的医疗分析:多中心 REVASK 研究:设计和方案。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):599-606. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721391. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG.2022 年 ESC/EACTS 联合对 2018 年指南建议的回顾:低手术风险且适合 PCI 或 CABG 解剖结构的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Aug 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad286.
4
Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.多支冠状动脉疾病中的冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮血运重建术的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
6
Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease.欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲心胸外科学会指南对稳定型冠状动脉疾病血运重建策略的影响:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的活动变化。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
7
Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgical Myocardial Revascularization: Results From the E-CABG (European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) With a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与外科血运重建患者的死亡率:E-CABG(欧洲冠状动脉旁路移植术多中心研究)的系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005650.
8
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
9
Five-year outcomes of surgical or percutaneous myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者心脏旁路手术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 5 年结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.030. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
10
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术根据 SYNTAX 评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.008007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for assessing guideline adherence for invasive procedures in the care of chronic coronary artery disease: a scoping review.评估慢性冠状动脉疾病治疗中侵袭性操作指南依从性的方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e069832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069832.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes and Multivessel Coronary Disease.糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者行血运重建治疗后的长期生存情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 8;76(10):1153-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.052.
2
German Heart Surgery Report 2019: The Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.《2019年德国心脏外科报告:德国胸心血管外科学会年度更新登记册》
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun;68(4):263-276. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710569. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Heart Team decision making and long-term outcomes for 1000 consecutive cases of coronary artery disease.
心脏团队决策与1000例连续冠状动脉疾病患者的长期预后
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb 1;28(2):206-213. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy237.
4
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Implementation and consistency of Heart Team decision-making in complex coronary revascularisation.心脏团队决策在复杂冠状动脉血运重建中的实施与一致性
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;206:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.041. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Revascularization heart team recommendations as an adjunct to appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease.血运重建心脏团队建议作为复杂冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉血运重建适当使用标准的辅助措施。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):E103-E112. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26276. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI.心脏团队冠状动脉血运重建方法及其对PCI术后临床事件的长期有益影响的描述。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 May;105(5):388-400. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0932-2. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM).冠状动脉疾病患者的标准化结局测量:国际健康结局测量协会(ICHOM)共识
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 19;4(5):e001767. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001767.
9
[Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].[二次数据分析的良好实践(GPS):指南与建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396815. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Safety and efficacy of implementing a multidisciplinary heart team approach for revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an observational cohort pilot study.实施多学科心脏团队方法对复杂冠状动脉疾病患者进行血运重建的安全性和有效性:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1109-12. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2059.