Suppr超能文献

比较 16 个国家的 COVID-19 应对策略的范围和效果:概述。

Comparing the Scope and Efficacy of COVID-19 Response Strategies in 16 Countries: An Overview.

机构信息

Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

Global Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):9421. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249421.

Abstract

This article synthesizes the results of case studies on the development of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and control measures by governments in 16 countries. When this work was conducted, only 6 months had passed since the pandemic began, and only 4 months since the first events were recognized outside of China. It was too early to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of measures in each of the selected countries; however, the authors present some efforts to identify and classify response and containment measures, country-by-country, for future comparison and analysis. There is a significant variety of policy tools and response measures employed in different countries, and while it is still hard to directly compare the different approaches based on their efficacy, it will definitely provide many inputs for the future data analysis efforts.

摘要

本文综合了 16 个国家针对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的发展和政府控制措施的案例研究结果。这项工作开展时,大流行开始仅 6 个月,而中国以外首次确认这些事件还不到 4 个月。对于所选国家中每项措施的有效性,现在得出明确结论还为时过早;然而,作者提出了一些努力,以便逐个国家地识别和分类应对和遏制措施,以供未来进行比较和分析。不同国家采用的政策工具和应对措施有很大差异,尽管根据其效果直接比较不同方法仍然困难,但这肯定会为未来的数据分析工作提供许多投入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9047/7765483/2eda268a99b6/ijerph-17-09421-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验