Suppr超能文献

描述外伤性脊髓损伤后的自然康复情况。

Characterizing Natural Recovery after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

机构信息

Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersy, USA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 1;38(9):1267-1284. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7473. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

The predominant tool used to predict outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), in association with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS). These measures have evolved based on analyses of large amounts of longitudinal neurological recovery data published in numerous separate studies. This article reviews and synthesizes published data on neurological recovery from multiple sources, only utilizing data in which the sacral sparing definition was applied for determination of completeness. Conversion from a complete to incomplete injury is more common in tetraplegia than paraplegia. The majority of AIS conversion and motor recovery occurs within the first 6-9 months, with the most rapid rate of motor recovery occurring in the first three months after injury. Motor score changes, as well as recovery of motor levels, are described with the initial strength of muscles as well as the levels of the motor zone of partial preservation influencing the prognosis. Total motor recovery is greater for patients with initial AIS B than AIS A, and greater after initial AIS C than with motor complete injuries. Older age has a negative impact on neurological and functional recovery after SCI; however, the specific age (whether >50 or >65 years) and underlying reasons for this impact are unclear. Penetrating injury is more likely to lead to a classification of a neurological complete injury compared with blunt trauma and reduces the likelihood of AIS conversion at one year. There are insufficient data to support gender having a major effect on neurological recovery after SCI.

摘要

用于预测创伤性脊髓损伤 (SCI) 后结果的主要工具是国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准 (ISNCSCI),结合美国脊髓损伤协会 (ASIA) 损伤量表 (AIS)。这些措施是基于对大量发表在众多独立研究中的纵向神经恢复数据的分析而发展起来的。本文综述和综合了来自多个来源的关于神经恢复的已发表数据,仅利用了应用骶骨保留定义来确定完整性的数据。四肢瘫痪比截瘫更常见从完全性损伤转变为不完全性损伤。AIS 转变和运动恢复的大部分发生在最初的 6-9 个月内,受伤后前三个月运动恢复的速度最快。运动评分的变化以及运动水平的恢复与肌肉最初的强度以及部分保留运动区的水平有关,这些因素影响预后。初始 AIS B 的患者比 AIS A 的患者总运动恢复更大,初始 AIS C 的患者比完全运动损伤的患者总运动恢复更大。年龄较大对 SCI 后的神经和功能恢复有负面影响;然而,具体的年龄(是否>50 岁或>65 岁)以及这种影响的原因尚不清楚。与钝性创伤相比,穿透性损伤更有可能导致神经完全性损伤的分类,并降低了 AIS 在一年时转变的可能性。没有足够的数据支持性别对 SCI 后神经恢复有重大影响。

相似文献

1
Characterizing Natural Recovery after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.描述外伤性脊髓损伤后的自然康复情况。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 1;38(9):1267-1284. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7473. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.创伤性脊髓损伤后的晚期神经功能恢复
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1811-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.015.

引用本文的文献

3
Spinal Cord Injury Remyelination: Pathways to Therapies.脊髓损伤再髓鞘化:治疗途径
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 26;26(15):7249. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157249.
6
Mechanisms of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury AIS Grade Conversion.创伤性脊髓损伤AIS分级转换机制
Neurotrauma Rep. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):506-524. doi: 10.1089/neur.2025.0035. eCollection 2025.
8
Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury.探索脊髓损伤生物标志物的前景
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Spring;31(2):1-12. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00076. Epub 2025 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验