Suppr超能文献

儿童不安睡眠:系统评价。

Restless sleep in children: A systematic review.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.

University of Illinois School of Medicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, and Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2021 Apr;56:101406. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101406. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

Abstract

This systematic review assessed the prevalence of restless sleep in children, documented the association of restless sleep with other conditions, and summarized the existing evidence regarding whether restless sleep should be considered a distinct sleep disorder. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed using the broad search term "restless sleep" in all fields. Of the 266 articles retrieved, 107 were retained for inclusion in this review. The majority (n = 93) were observational studies. The studies were grouped under several pathologic/condition categories: sleep-disordered breathing (n = 19); adenotonsillectomy (n = 7); respiratory disorders, otitis media, and smoke exposure (n = 12); sleep-related movement disorders and restless sleep disorder (n = 11); neurologic or psychiatric disorders (n = 7); Down syndrome/other neurodevelopmental disorders (n = 10); sleep-related bruxism and other sleep disorders (n = 7); and restless sleep in the general population/mixed clinical samples (n = 18). A high prevalence of restless sleep was found in children with many of these underlying conditions, likely related to associated inherent sleep disruption and frequent awakenings (e.g., apnea and periodic limb movements), pain, sleep instability, and caregiver perception. The majority of studies identified restless sleep as reported by the caregiver, only 34 studies attempted to define restless sleep further. Four studies provided supportive evidence for designating restless sleep as an independent sleep disorder, restless sleep disorder (RSD). This review highlights the fact that the prevalence, etiology and sequelae (including daytime impairments) of restless sleep in children are important topics deserving of further research and that clinical definitions based on empirical evidence need to be developed. The designation of "primary" versus "secondary" restless sleep may be a useful construct, especially with regard to developing clinical trials and treatment algorithms.

摘要

本系统评价评估了儿童不安睡眠的流行率,记录了不安睡眠与其他疾病的关联,并总结了目前关于不安睡眠是否应被视为一种独特的睡眠障碍的证据。使用广泛的搜索词“不安睡眠”在所有字段中对电子数据库进行了全面搜索。在检索到的 266 篇文章中,有 107 篇被保留纳入本综述。大多数(n=93)为观察性研究。这些研究分为几个病理/疾病类别:睡眠障碍性呼吸(n=19);腺样体扁桃体切除术(n=7);呼吸障碍、中耳炎和吸烟暴露(n=12);睡眠相关运动障碍和不安睡眠障碍(n=11);神经或精神障碍(n=7);唐氏综合征/其他神经发育障碍(n=10);睡眠相关磨牙症和其他睡眠障碍(n=7);以及普通人群/混合临床样本中的不安睡眠(n=18)。许多潜在疾病的儿童中不安睡眠的发生率很高,这可能与相关的固有睡眠中断和频繁觉醒(如呼吸暂停和周期性肢体运动)、疼痛、睡眠不稳定和照顾者感知有关。大多数研究将不安睡眠定义为照顾者报告的睡眠障碍,只有 34 项研究试图进一步定义不安睡眠。四项研究为将不安睡眠指定为独立睡眠障碍(不安睡眠障碍,RSD)提供了支持性证据。本综述强调了以下事实:儿童不安睡眠的流行率、病因和后果(包括日间损害)是值得进一步研究的重要课题,需要根据经验证据制定临床定义。“原发性”与“继发性”不安睡眠的区分可能是一种有用的方法,尤其是在制定临床试验和治疗方案时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验