• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种逐步工具,以协助初级卫生保健专业人员对老年人进行减药。

Development of a stepwise tool to aide primary health care professionals in the process of deprescribing in older persons.

作者信息

Salas Roxana De Las, Eslava-Schmalbach Javier, Vaca-González Claudia, Rodríguez Dolores, Figueras Albert

机构信息

BSN, MSc. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia).

MD, MSc, PhD. Professor. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2033. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2033. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2033
PMID:33343769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7732213/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a stepwise tool to aid primary health care professionals in the process of deprescribing potentially inappropriate medication in older persons.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review to identify previously published tools. A composite proposal of algorithm was made by following the steps from clinical experience to deprescribe medications. A 2-round electronic Delphi method was conducted to establish consensus. Eighteen experts from different countries (Colombia, Spain and Argentina) accepted to be part of the panel representing geriatricians, internists, endocrinologist, general practitioners, pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists, family physicians and nurses. Panel members were asked to mark a Likert Scale from 1 to 9 points (1= strongly disagree, 9= strongly agree). The content validity ratio, item-level content validity, and Fleiss' Kappa statistics was measured to establish reliability. The same voting method was used for round 2.

RESULTS

A 7-question algorithm was proposed. Each question was part of a domain and conduct into a decision. In round 1, a consensus was not reached but statements were grouped and organized. In round 2, the tool met consensus. The inter-rater reliability was between substantial and almost perfect for questions with Kappa=0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.93), for domains with Kappa= 0.73 (95%CI 0.60-0.86) and for decisions with Kappa= 0.97 (95%CI 0.90-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

This is a novel tool that captures and supports healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making for deprescribing potentially inappropriate medication. This includes patient's and caregiver's preferences about medication. This tool will help to standardize care and provide guidance on the prescribing/deprescribing process of older persons' medications. Also, it provides a holistic way to reduce polypharmacy and inappropriate medications in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证一种逐步工具,以协助初级卫生保健专业人员在老年人中停用潜在不适当药物的过程。

方法

我们进行了系统综述以识别先前发表的工具。通过遵循从临床经验到停用药物的步骤,提出了算法的综合建议。采用两轮电子德尔菲法达成共识。来自不同国家(哥伦比亚、西班牙和阿根廷)的18名专家接受成为代表老年病学家、内科医生、内分泌学家、全科医生、药理学家、临床药剂师、家庭医生和护士的小组成员。要求小组成员在1至9分的李克特量表上打分(1 = 强烈不同意,9 = 强烈同意)。测量内容效度比、项目级内容效度和Fleiss' Kappa统计量以确定可靠性。第二轮采用相同的投票方法。

结果

提出了一个包含7个问题的算法。每个问题都是一个领域的一部分并进行决策。在第一轮中,未达成共识,但陈述被分组和整理。在第二轮中,该工具达成了共识。对于问题,评分者间信度在实质性和几乎完美之间,Kappa = 0.77(95%CI 0.60 - 0.93);对于领域,Kappa = 0.73(95%CI 0.60 - 0.86);对于决策,Kappa = 0.97(95%CI 0.90 - 1.00)。

结论

这是一种新颖的工具,可在临床决策中捕捉并支持医疗保健专业人员停用潜在不适当药物。这包括患者和护理人员对药物的偏好。该工具将有助于规范护理,并为老年人药物的处方/停用过程提供指导。此外,它提供了一种整体方法,以减少临床实践中的多重用药和不适当用药。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83da/7732213/3ceca7562fe9/pharmpract-18-2033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83da/7732213/3ceca7562fe9/pharmpract-18-2033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83da/7732213/3ceca7562fe9/pharmpract-18-2033-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a stepwise tool to aide primary health care professionals in the process of deprescribing in older persons.开发一种逐步工具,以协助初级卫生保健专业人员对老年人进行减药。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2033. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2033. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
2
Tackling potentially inappropriate prescriptions in older adults: development of deprescribing criteria by consensus from experts in Colombia, Argentina, and Spain.解决老年人潜在不适当处方问题:哥伦比亚、阿根廷和西班牙专家共识制定的减药标准。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04271-9.
3
STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy): consensus validation.STOPPFrail(预期寿命有限的体弱成年人老年人处方筛查工具):共识验证
Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):600-607. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx005.
4
Deprescribing in frail older people--Do doctors and pharmacists agree?老年体弱患者的减药治疗——医生和药剂师意见一致吗?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):438-49. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Inter-rater reliability of STOPPFrail [Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy] criteria amongst 12 physicians.12名医生对STOPPFrail(预期寿命有限的体弱成年人老年人处方筛查工具)标准的评分者间信度。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;74(3):331-338. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2376-2. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
What are priorities for deprescribing for elderly patients? Capturing the voice of practitioners: a modified delphi process.老年患者减药的优先事项有哪些?倾听从业者的声音:一种改良的德尔菲法。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122246. eCollection 2015.
7
Development and Validation of Nine Deprescribing Algorithms for Patients on Hemodialysis to Decrease Polypharmacy.九种用于血液透析患者减少多重用药的停药算法的开发与验证
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Oct 29;7:2054358120968674. doi: 10.1177/2054358120968674. eCollection 2020.
8
Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology.采用改良 Delphi 法对肩袖疾病患者的诊断与治疗达成临床共识。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8.
9
Deprescribing of antidepressants: development of indicators of high-risk and overprescribing using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.抗抑郁药的减药:使用 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法制定高风险和过度处方的指标。
BMC Med. 2024 May 13;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03397-w.
10
Deprescribing in multi-morbid older people with polypharmacy: agreement between STOPPFrail explicit criteria and gold standard deprescribing using 100 standardized clinical cases.多病共存且用药过多的老年患者的撤药治疗:STOPPFrail明确标准与使用100个标准化临床病例的撤药治疗金标准之间的一致性
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;75(3):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2598-y. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Tackling potentially inappropriate prescriptions in older adults: development of deprescribing criteria by consensus from experts in Colombia, Argentina, and Spain.解决老年人潜在不适当处方问题:哥伦比亚、阿根廷和西班牙专家共识制定的减药标准。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04271-9.
2
Recent Updates on Risk and Management Plans Associated with Polypharmacy in Older Population.老年人群多重用药相关风险及管理计划的最新进展
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;7(5):97. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050097.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.药师主导的教育干预对老年人不合理用药处方的影响:D-PRESCRIBE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131.
2
Polypharmacy as a risk factor for hospital admission among ambulance-transported old-old patients.多重用药作为老年患者救护车转运入院的危险因素。
Acute Med Surg. 2015 Aug 27;3(2):107-113. doi: 10.1002/ams2.153. eCollection 2016 Apr.
3
Association between polypharmacy and falls in older adults: a longitudinal study from England.
老年人多重用药与跌倒之间的关联:一项来自英国的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e016358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016358.
4
US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年美国急诊科门诊不良药物事件就诊情况
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16201.
5
Methodology for Developing Deprescribing Guidelines: Using Evidence and GRADE to Guide Recommendations for Deprescribing.制定减药指南的方法:利用证据和GRADE指导减药建议
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0161248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161248. eCollection 2016.
6
Changes in Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medication and Dietary Supplement Use Among Older Adults in the United States, 2005 vs 2011.2005年与2011年美国老年人处方药、非处方药及膳食补充剂使用情况的变化
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):473-82. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8581.
7
A medication review and deprescribing method for hospitalised older patients receiving multiple medications.一种针对住院接受多种药物治疗的老年患者的药物评估与减药方法。
Intern Med J. 2016 Jan;46(1):35-42. doi: 10.1111/imj.12906.
8
Effects of polypharmacy on adverse drug reactions among geriatric outpatients at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi: a prospective cohort study.卡拉奇一家三级护理医院老年门诊患者多重用药对药物不良反应的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e112133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112133. eCollection 2014.
9
Polypharmacy including falls risk-increasing medications and subsequent falls in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.多重用药,包括增加跌倒风险的药物,以及社区居住的中老年人随后发生的跌倒。
Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):90-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu141. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
10
Adverse drug event nonrecognition in emergency departments: an exploratory study on factors related to patients and drugs.急诊科对药物不良事件的漏诊:一项关于患者和药物相关因素的探索性研究。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.124. Epub 2014 Feb 22.