Oliver Gretchen D, Downs Jessica L, Barbosa Germanna M, Camargo Paula R
The Sports Medicine & Movement Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):1090-1098. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20201090.
The unilateral and repetitive nature of overhead sports, often result in a biomechanical overload of the upper extremity. Understanding the musculoskeletal shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength patterns in the youth sports of baseball, softball, and tennis could assist injury prevention screening and further the development of conditioning and rehabilitation programs.
To generate a descriptive profile of shoulder musculoskeletal characteristics and determine whether bilateral differences in shoulder ROM exist in youth baseball, softball, and tennis athletes. A secondary aim was to determine whether shoulder rotational adaptations are correlated with playing position, sport, or years of experience.
Descriptive Laboratory.
A total of 136 competitive youth overhead athletes (baseball: n = 51,12.8 ± 0.9yrs; softball: n = 63,12.3 ± 1.1yrs; and tennis: n = 22,12.5 ± 0.9yrs) participated. Bilateral shoulder internal (IR) and external (ER) passive ROM and external rotation strength were measured using an inclinometer and handheld dynamometer.
Significant differences (<.001) in bilateral shoulder ROM and ER strength were found between the athletes in the three sports. Post-hoc test revealed tennis athletes had greater bilateral shoulder ROM than both baseball and softball athletes, but baseball and softball athletes had greater bilateral ER strength than tennis athletes. There were no differences between baseball and softball athletes. Additionally, tennis athletes had greater bilateral internal rotation and total ROM but less ER strength than baseball pitchers, baseball positional athletes, softball pitchers, and softball positional athletes. There were no significant differences between positions and baseball and softball athletes. There were no significant correlations between playing position, sport, or years of experience.
The results of this study showed differences in shoulder passive ROM and strength adaptations between youth tennis, baseball, and softball athletes. The descriptive nature of this study is impactful as it presents specific ROM adaptions seen in this population. Future research is needed to further evaluate if the "at risk" ROM identified in older populations holds true in the youth population.
Diagnosis, Level 3b.
过头运动的单侧性和重复性,常常导致上肢生物力学过载。了解青少年棒球、垒球和网球运动中肩部肌肉骨骼的活动范围(ROM)和力量模式,有助于预防损伤筛查,并推动体能训练和康复计划的发展。
生成肩部肌肉骨骼特征的描述性概况,并确定青少年棒球、垒球和网球运动员的肩部ROM是否存在双侧差异。次要目的是确定肩部旋转适应性是否与比赛位置、运动项目或运动年限相关。
描述性实验室研究。
共有136名竞技青少年过头运动运动员(棒球:n = 51,12.8±0.9岁;垒球:n = 63,12.3±1.1岁;网球:n = 22,12.5±0.9岁)参与。使用倾角计和手持测力计测量双侧肩部内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)被动ROM以及外旋力量。
在这三项运动的运动员中,双侧肩部ROM和ER力量存在显著差异(<.001)。事后检验显示,网球运动员的双侧肩部ROM大于棒球和垒球运动员,但棒球和垒球运动员的双侧ER力量大于网球运动员。棒球和垒球运动员之间没有差异。此外,网球运动员的双侧内旋和总ROM更大,但ER力量小于棒球投手、棒球位置球员、垒球投手和垒球位置球员。位置与棒球和垒球运动员之间没有显著差异。比赛位置、运动项目或运动年限之间没有显著相关性。
本研究结果显示,青少年网球、棒球和垒球运动员在肩部被动ROM和力量适应性方面存在差异。本研究的描述性性质具有影响力,因为它呈现了该人群中特定的ROM适应性。未来需要进一步研究,以评估在老年人群中确定的“风险”ROM在青少年人群中是否适用。
诊断,3b级。