• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沿枝条的叶片形状复合建模比单个叶片更能区分物种。

Composite modeling of leaf shape along shoots discriminates species better than individual leaves.

作者信息

Bryson Abigail E, Wilson Brown Maya, Mullins Joey, Dong Wei, Bahmani Keivan, Bornowski Nolan, Chiu Christina, Engelgau Philip, Gettings Bethany, Gomezcano Fabio, Gregory Luke M, Haber Anna C, Hoh Donghee, Jennings Emily E, Ji Zhongjie, Kaur Prabhjot, Kenchanmane Raju Sunil K, Long Yunfei, Lotreck Serena G, Mathieu Davis T, Ranaweera Thilanka, Ritter Eleanore J, Sadohara Rie, Shrote Robert Z, Smith Kaila E, Teresi Scott J, Venegas Julian, Wang Hao, Wilson McKena L, Tarrant Alyssa R, Frank Margaret H, Migicovsky Zoë, Kumar Jyothi, VanBuren Robert, Londo Jason P, Chitwood Daniel H

机构信息

Genetics Program Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA.

出版信息

Appl Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 3;8(12):e11404. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11404. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/aps3.11404
PMID:33344095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7742203/
Abstract

PREMISE

Leaf morphology is dynamic, continuously deforming during leaf expansion and among leaves within a shoot. Here, we measured the leaf morphology of more than 200 grapevines ( spp.) over four years and modeled changes in leaf shape along the shoot to determine whether a composite leaf shape comprising all the leaves from a single shoot can better capture the variation and predict species identity compared with individual leaves.

METHODS

Using homologous universal landmarks found in grapevine leaves, we modeled various morphological features as polynomial functions of leaf nodes. The resulting functions were used to reconstruct modeled leaf shapes across the shoots, generating composite leaves that comprehensively capture the spectrum of leaf morphologies present.

RESULTS

We found that composite leaves are better predictors of species identity than individual leaves from the same plant. We were able to use composite leaves to predict the species identity of previously unassigned grapevines, which were verified with genotyping.

DISCUSSION

Observations of individual leaf shape fail to capture the true diversity between species. Composite leaf shape-an assemblage of modeled leaf snapshots across the shoot-is a better representation of the dynamic and essential shapes of leaves, in addition to serving as a better predictor of species identity than individual leaves.

摘要

前提

叶片形态是动态的,在叶片扩展过程中以及同一枝条上的叶片之间会持续变形。在此,我们在四年时间里测量了200多株葡萄(品种)的叶片形态,并对沿枝条的叶片形状变化进行建模,以确定与单个叶片相比,包含单个枝条上所有叶片的复合叶片形状是否能更好地捕捉变异并预测物种身份。

方法

利用在葡萄叶片中发现的同源通用地标,我们将各种形态特征建模为叶节点的多项式函数。所得函数用于重建枝条上的模拟叶片形状,生成能全面捕捉现有叶片形态谱的复合叶片。

结果

我们发现,与同一植株的单个叶片相比,复合叶片是更好的物种身份预测指标。我们能够使用复合叶片来预测先前未鉴定的葡萄品种的物种身份,并通过基因分型进行了验证。

讨论

对单个叶片形状的观察无法捕捉物种之间的真正差异。复合叶片形状——整个枝条上模拟叶片快照的集合——除了比单个叶片更能作为物种身份的预测指标外,还能更好地体现叶片的动态和基本形状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/e6d2c2c88f0a/APS3-8-e11404-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/603391c7f40c/APS3-8-e11404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/b38d87cad234/APS3-8-e11404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/c171ee7b56ce/APS3-8-e11404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/1f482d828022/APS3-8-e11404-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/98d3847716be/APS3-8-e11404-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/e6d2c2c88f0a/APS3-8-e11404-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/603391c7f40c/APS3-8-e11404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/b38d87cad234/APS3-8-e11404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/c171ee7b56ce/APS3-8-e11404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/1f482d828022/APS3-8-e11404-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/98d3847716be/APS3-8-e11404-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2137/7742203/e6d2c2c88f0a/APS3-8-e11404-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Composite modeling of leaf shape along shoots discriminates species better than individual leaves.沿枝条的叶片形状复合建模比单个叶片更能区分物种。
Appl Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 3;8(12):e11404. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11404. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Latent developmental and evolutionary shapes embedded within the grapevine leaf.葡萄叶片中蕴含的潜在发育和进化形态。
New Phytol. 2016 Apr;210(1):343-55. doi: 10.1111/nph.13754. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Digital Morphometrics of Two North American Grapevines (: Vitaceae) Quantifies Leaf Variation between Species, within Species, and among Individuals.两种北美葡萄(葡萄科)的数字形态测量量化了物种间、物种内和个体间的叶片差异。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 17;8:373. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00373. eCollection 2017.
4
Increases in vein length compensate for leaf area lost to lobing in grapevine.叶片分裂片导致叶面积减少,而叶脉长度增加可以补偿这一损失。
Am J Bot. 2022 Jul;109(7):1063-1073. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16033. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Divergent leaf shapes among species arise from a shared juvenile morphology.物种间不同的叶片形状源自共同的幼年形态。
Plant Direct. 2017 Nov 6;1(5):e00028. doi: 10.1002/pld3.28. eCollection 2017 Nov.
6
Climate and Developmental Plasticity: Interannual Variability in Grapevine Leaf Morphology.气候与发育可塑性:葡萄叶片形态的年际变化
Plant Physiol. 2016 Mar;170(3):1480-91. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01825. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Vein-to-blade ratio is an allometric indicator of leaf size and plasticity.叶脉与叶片比例是叶片大小和可塑性的异速生长指标。
Am J Bot. 2021 Apr;108(4):571-579. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1639.
8
Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Leaf Morphology Indicates Conserved Shape Loci in Grapevine.叶片形态的数量性状位点分析表明葡萄中存在保守的形状位点。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 15;10:1373. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01373. eCollection 2019.
9
A predicted developmental and evolutionary morphospace for grapevine leaves.葡萄叶片预测的发育和进化形态空间。
Quant Plant Biol. 2022 Oct 7;3:e22. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2022.13. eCollection 2022.
10
Quantitative analysis of the phenotypic variability of shoot architecture in two grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars.两个葡萄(欧亚种葡萄)品种茎尖结构表型变异性的定量分析。
Ann Bot. 2007 Mar;99(3):425-37. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl276. Epub 2007 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Small, but mitey: investigating the molecular genetic basis for mite domatia development and intraspecific variation in Vitis riparia using transcriptomics.虽小却强大:利用转录组学研究河岸葡萄螨类栖息处发育及种内变异的分子遗传基础。
New Phytol. 2025 Jan;245(1):215-231. doi: 10.1111/nph.20226. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Interdisciplinarity through internationality: Results from a US-Mexico graduate course bridging computational and plant science.通过国际化实现跨学科:美国-墨西哥一门衔接计算科学与植物科学的研究生课程的成果
Plant Direct. 2024 Oct 25;8(10):e70019. doi: 10.1002/pld3.70019. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
From buds to shoots: insights into grapevine development from the Witch's Broom bud sport.

本文引用的文献

1
The influences of environmental change and development on leaf shape in Vitis.环境变化和发展对葡萄叶片形状的影响。
Am J Bot. 2020 Apr;107(4):676-688. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1460. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
The shape of things to come: Topological data analysis and biology, from molecules to organisms.未来的形态:从分子到生物体的拓扑数据分析和生物学。
Dev Dyn. 2020 Jul;249(7):816-833. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.175. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Leaf Morphology Indicates Conserved Shape Loci in Grapevine.叶片形态的数量性状位点分析表明葡萄中存在保守的形状位点。
从芽到梢:葡萄扇叶病芽变的发育见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04992-y.
4
Topological data analysis reveals core heteroblastic and ontogenetic programs embedded in leaves of grapevine (Vitaceae) and maracuyá (Passifloraceae).拓扑数据分析揭示了葡萄(葡萄科)和百香果(西番莲科)叶片中嵌入的核心异形和个体发生程序。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Feb 5;20(2):e1011845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011845. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications.生物医学出版物中 Jupyter 笔记本的计算可重复性。
Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giad113.
6
Species relationships within the genus Vitis based on molecular and morphological data.基于分子和形态学数据的葡萄属内种间关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 31;18(7):e0283324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283324. eCollection 2023.
7
A predicted developmental and evolutionary morphospace for grapevine leaves.葡萄叶片预测的发育和进化形态空间。
Quant Plant Biol. 2022 Oct 7;3:e22. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2022.13. eCollection 2022.
8
A Review of Ampelometry: Morphometric Characterization of the Grape ( spp.) Leaf.安培测定法综述:葡萄(属)叶片的形态特征分析
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;12(3):452. doi: 10.3390/plants12030452.
9
Increases in vein length compensate for leaf area lost to lobing in grapevine.叶片分裂片导致叶面积减少,而叶脉长度增加可以补偿这一损失。
Am J Bot. 2022 Jul;109(7):1063-1073. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16033. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
MFCIS: an automatic leaf-based identification pipeline for plant cultivars using deep learning and persistent homology.MFCIS:一种基于深度学习和持久同调的用于植物品种自动叶片识别流程
Hortic Res. 2021 Aug 1;8(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00608-w.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 15;10:1373. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01373. eCollection 2019.
4
Divergent leaf shapes among species arise from a shared juvenile morphology.物种间不同的叶片形状源自共同的幼年形态。
Plant Direct. 2017 Nov 6;1(5):e00028. doi: 10.1002/pld3.28. eCollection 2017 Nov.
5
Topological Data Analysis as a Morphometric Method: Using Persistent Homology to Demarcate a Leaf Morphospace.作为一种形态测量方法的拓扑数据分析:利用持久同调划分叶片形态空间。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 25;9:553. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00553. eCollection 2018.
6
High-throughput sequencing data clarify evolutionary relationships among North American Vitis species and improve identification in USDA Vitis germplasm collections.高通量测序数据阐明了北美葡萄属物种之间的进化关系,并提高了美国农业部葡萄种质资源收集的鉴定能力。
Am J Bot. 2018 Feb;105(2):215-226. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1033. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Morphometric analysis of Passiflora leaves: the relationship between landmarks of the vasculature and elliptical Fourier descriptors of the blade.西番莲叶片的形态测量分析:脉管系统地标与叶片椭圆傅里叶描述符之间的关系。
Gigascience. 2017 Jan 1;6(1):1-13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giw008.
8
Computer vision cracks the leaf code.计算机视觉破解了叶片密码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 22;113(12):3305-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524473113. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Fast Principal-Component Analysis Reveals Convergent Evolution of ADH1B in Europe and East Asia.快速主成分分析揭示了乙醇脱氢酶1B在欧洲和东亚的趋同进化。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Mar 3;98(3):456-472. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
10
Climate and Developmental Plasticity: Interannual Variability in Grapevine Leaf Morphology.气候与发育可塑性:葡萄叶片形态的年际变化
Plant Physiol. 2016 Mar;170(3):1480-91. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01825. Epub 2016 Jan 29.